Search this site

The 10% deposit is a relic of tradition, misaligned with modern yacht transactions. This white paper proposes splitting upfront payments: one paying for a more comprehensive sea trial, the other for a purchase option. The model compensates brokers much more fairly for their hard work, ensures that sellers are fairly protected, and creates a more balanced and practical framework for high-value sales. Home Handbook White Papers / / Deposits Reimagined THE DEFAULT POSITION Where the contract doesn’t state why a deposit is paid and how it can be recovered, then the default position (under English law – which is commonly used in international agreements) is that it is more than a mere part-payment: it is a guarantee that the buyer will complete, which the seller gets to keep as ‘liquidated’ (i.e. pre-agreed) damages if the buyer defaults – regardless of whether the seller has suffered any actual loss. And 10% has traditionally been the magic number. Anything more has been treated by the courts as punitive rather than compensatory – and so an unenforceable penalty clause. But this could be hard to justify in the context of the sale of an asset as expensive as one of our Members’ yachts. MYBA'S APPROACH MYBA’s Memorandum of Agreement is the dominant transactional framework for yacht sales in European waters. Under the MYBA MOA, the deposit (usually 10%) is payable upon signing, with the balance paid on completion after a successful sea trial and survey. The deposit is typically held by the broker, as stakeholder for both parties, and cannot be released except in accordance with the agreement's terms. If the buyer fails to pay the balance in accordance with the MOA, the seller can cancel and the deposit is released on a 50:50 basis between seller and broker. Various versions of this form are used, but the buyer typically has only four hours maximum for a sea trial. Even the prospective purchasers of cars can often spend a weekend test driving. And if the buyer walks away after the sea trial, the deposit must be repaid by the broker (less “all expenses … if any” although what this encompasses isn’t clear). And spare a thought for the broker(s) who will have put in an enormous amount of work into humouring a tyre-kicker - with no commission to show for it. IYBA’S APPROACH The International Yacht Brokers Association (which, despite the name, predominantly covers the US market) publishes its own Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA). This differs in several material respects from its European cousin, the MYBA MOA. There’s no stipulation for a 10% deposit, although this is commonly the starting point. In practice, deposits can be as low as 5% for higher-value vessels. There’s no set time for how long the “trial run” should take, just a provision that this should be completed “as soon as practicable”. Unlike the MYBA MOA, “all running expenses” being for the seller’s account – not the buyer’s. Moreover, whether or not the buyer has inspected the vessel, the buyer will be deemed to have rejected it unless a timely written notice of acceptance is submitted to the seller. DUAL UPFRONT PAYMENTS It’s time for traditional deposits to evolve. Here’s the idea. The buyer has the option of paying two separate amounts upfront: Firstly, a payment reflecting the actual cost of a meaningfully-long sea trial (of, say, a week) using as a guide the equivalent amount paid to charter a similar-size vessel for the same period; and Secondly, a payment paid to secure the right to purchase within the closure timeframe, just large enough to deter any daydreamers. Both amounts are set-off against the final balance due on completion, but the buyer can walk away after the sea trial no questions asked, in which case only the second amount would be repaid. This approach is surely better for the seller, who knows at the outset that an agreed fixed amount has already been paid as reasonable compensation for preparing the vessel and undertaking the sea trial. Crew can prepare the vessel to perfection. The broker should also be delighted, as he or she can still continue marketing the vessel where the prospective buyer hasn’t made the second payment. That buyer can also trial a selection of vessels, so that the choice changes from whether to buy – to which to buy. The broker could even take this a step further and charge for vessel tours, further fending off timewasters. With the seller’s blessing, sea trial payments could be retained by the broker to reward ongoing efforts and a sometimes uncertain income stream. The buyer might wish to try out several yachts – without the need to book a charter (keeping in mind that only a minority of yachts are registered for commercial use). And having had the opportunity to conduct a more thorough sea trial, buyer’s remorse is far less likely. The amount paid for this privilege being deducted from the final balance, he or she is no worse off after completion. Crewmembers will have an opportunity to display their skills to a prospective new employer, increasing the chances of them being retained by the new owner. CONCLUSION The 10% deposit owes as much to tradition than to the practical needs of today’s marketplace. It’s time to take a fresh look at this subject and make sale agreements work more effectively for everyone involved. Yes, there would need to be a dialogue with Flag States and insurance underwriters – to ensure that they understand that the sea trial is not a charter by another name. But both have shown in recent years that they are open to fresh ideas. Certainly, the sale agreement incorporating such dual upfront payments will need very careful drafting. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who provided perspectives for this white paper. The 10% deposit is a relic of tradition, misaligned with modern yacht transactions. This white paper proposes splitting upfront payments: one paying for a more comprehensive sea trial, the other for a purchase option. The model compensates brokers much more fairly for their hard work, ensures that sellers are fairly protected, and creates a more balanced and practical framework for high-value sales. 15 October 2025 Last revised minutes 4 Reading time minutes 4 Reading time 15 October 2025 Last revised The 10% deposit is a relic of tradition, misaligned with modern yacht transactions. This white paper proposes splitting upfront payments: one paying for a more comprehensive sea trial, the other for a purchase option. The model compensates brokers much more fairly for their hard work, ensures that sellers are fairly protected, and creates a more balanced and practical framework for high-value sales. For over a century, yacht brokers and lawyers have treated the 10% deposit as gospel. A ritual payment that signals commitment, deters flakiness, and soothes sellers’ nerves. But this figure, rooted in dusty English caselaw and carried into modern international agreements, is starting to look hopelessly outdated. In today’s yacht market, where buyers expect flexibility and transparency, this old model is looking outdated. This paper argues that the industry should abandon the “one-size-fits-all” single deposit and embrace a more nuanced, dual-payment model — one that reflects modern realities, aligns incentives, and makes the buying process fairer for sellers, brokers, and serious purchasers alike. You can also read about A Flood Not a Trickle Questions or comments? Please contact us Join the discussion over in the Club's group You can also read about A Flood Not a Trickle Questions or comments? Please contact us

Building a large, custom yacht is a complex process which must be carefully choreographed. There’re a lot of specialists involved, and much which can wrong. Here we look at what construction actually involves, and why building your team at the outset is such a vital first step. Home Handbook Building / / The Build Process 10 May 2023 Last revised minutes 4 Reading time Building a large, custom yacht is a complex process which must be carefully choreographed. There are a lot of specialists involved, and much which can wrong. Here we look at what construction actually involves, and why building your team at the outset is such a vital first step. minutes 4 Reading time 10 May 2023 Last revised Building a large, custom yacht is a complex process which must be carefully choreographed. There are a lot of specialists involved, and much which can wrong. Here we look at what construction actually involves, and why building your team at the outset is such a vital first step. Large yacht construction involves a tightly-controlled sequence of events, and adherence to classification society standards for welding and quality control. Machinery and larger systems must be installed before the superstructure is joined ot the hull. Filling, fairing, insulation, and the addition of cable trays and pipework must be carefully choreographed. Interior panels are prefabricated and should be removable for access and maintenance. The sooner the build captain is recruited the better. Project managers should be present at all stages of the build and provide progress reports. Crewmembers, other than the build captain, are engaged as the build nears completion, with the build captain overseeing recruitment. Insurance coverage should be clarified in the build agreement, including employer's liability insurance for crew. Sea trials are conducted to test the yacht's systems and performance, followed by formal legal delivery and a warranty period to address any issues that arise. Project managers should be present at all stages of the build and provide progress reports. Crewmembers, other than the build captain, are engaged as the build nears completion, with the build captain overseeing recruitment. Insurance coverage should be clarified in the build agreement, including employer's liability insurance for crew. Sea trials are conducted to test the yacht's systems and performance, followed by formal legal delivery and a warranty period to address any issues that arise. Large yacht construction involves a tightly-controlled sequence of events, and adherence to classification society standards for welding and quality control. Machinery and larger systems must be installed before the superstructure is joined ot the hull. Filling, fairing, insulation, and the addition of cable trays and pipework must be carefully choreographed. Interior panels are prefabricated and should be removable for access and maintenance. The sooner the build captain is recruited the better. Generally speaking, yachts are far more complex than working vessels of a similar size, and finishes must, of course, be of a far higher standard. Yard cleanliness and orderliness make ensuring this much easier. You’ll have gotten a feel for the builder’s work practices having visited beforehand . Once the build is underway, there’s a lot going on and a lot to go wrong. For steel-hulled yachts, huge plates are cut to shape before being assembled and welded into place. Steps must be taken in precisely the right order. Where the vessel will be classed, welders must be qualified in accordance with the classification society standards. The welds themselves must conform to measurable standards with tolerances measuring less than a millimetre. If it’s not right it must be corrected until it is. It can take a year and half to complete a bare 100-metre hull, during which about 1,000 tonnes of steel will be used. Superstructures are typically made from aluminium – requiring even greater welding skills. They are usually constructed in sections, away from the hull, then bonded together. Larger items of machinery, such as engines and generators, must be installed before superstructure encloses the internal spaces. The project will then typically be moved way from under the gantry cranes of the construction facility, to a fitting-out facility, where the machinery and systems will be fitted. The hull’s surface will be slightly rippled and will need filling and fairing: a skilled and labour-intensive process. The epoxy fillers, and paints covering them, are sensitive to temperature and humidity. Insulation, cable trays and pipework can now be installed – in exactly the right sequence. Interior panels are normally prefabricated by subcontractors, before being brought to the yard for installation. They will normally produce full-scale mock-ups of various interiors which you can check before they are installed. It’s important that the bulkhead and deckhead panels be removeable to allow access as needed for regular system maintenance. It's vital that photographs are taken during construction so that what’s behind the panels can be checked easily. SUPERVISION The builder will employ its own project manager(s), but with so much going on it’s easy to see why your project manager needs to be present at all stages of the build. Your project manager should compile monthly reports showing progress, with photos and detailing how this compares to the agreed time schedule. Your project manager should also know the build agreement inside-out, and must remind you of upcoming decision deadlines in good time. As with any large project, communication is key. ENGAGING CREW More and more crew are brought in as the build nears completion. The build captain is first – and in the case of larger projects may have been engaged at the outset. Where the build is on a more modest scale, the project manager also performs the role of build captain and may be the vessel’s first captain following launch. Build captains perform two roles: firstly they add a helpful seagoing captain’s perspective to the build, and secondly they recruit and oversee other crewmembers. The build captain will need excellent organisational skills, an analytical mindset and be a superb manager and motivator. Next comes the Chief Engineer, who can bring real value right away, followed by other heads of departments, who will be key in recruiting those who report to them – and may already have contacts waiting in the wings. Some hires may have been misjudged and just aren’t the right fit. This is to be expected. Not hiring crew until absolutely necessary can be a false economy. There’s much to be got ready before launch. Aside from completing the build, operational and regulatory procedures need to be established, and if these are rushed they may not be fit for purpose. INSURANCE The build agreement should be clear on when the build no longer bears the risk of damage occurring to the yacht, or the liabilities incurred to third parties. There should be no gaps in cover. Keep in mind, too, that you will need employers’ liability insurance in respect of crew as soon as they are engaged. While insurance brokers owe a legal duty to you, as insured, in reality they can value their commercial relationships with underwriters more. Indeed, some will expressly be your agent at the time of inception, but become the underwriter’s agent once a claim has been made. Be warned, and examine the policies in detail. TRIALS At last, your new yacht is complete and is ready for her first sea trial. You may like to come along – but it’s not going to be the most exciting cruise. Before she goes anywhere, there’s a dock trial. The generators and main engines are started and their cooling systems checked for leaks. Once the captain is satisfied that she is ready, she can head out to sea. Aboard will be representatives from the builder, subcontractors and classification society, as well as your own team. All kinds of objective measurements are made which can be checked against the contractual specification. The trial will take most of the day, or a few days for a large, complex vessel. DELIVERY At last your yacht is ready for formal, legal delivery. There may still be teething problems evident at the time of delivery, which the builder hasn’t had time to correct, but which you’re happy to live with for now. The scope and nature of such works must be formally agreed. The build documentation will have been examined and approved by your lawyer, and will be released to you against receipt of the penultimate payment – the final payment being made upon successful completion of the warranty period. WARRANTY PERIOD Because yachts are, in essence, a matrix of complex systems operating together in a harsh environment, it is inevitable that some systems will fail, or fail to perform as expected. The warranty period should be clearly set out in the build agreement. It is vital for crewmembers to inform the captain, and the captain to inform you and the builder, right away and in writing, of any faults. Documentation and record keeping are key. Keep in mind any notice formalities which must be observed. It's in the builder’s interests to work with you to create a yacht which will serve as a masterpiece – quite literally a shining example of what that yard is able to produce. Finding new clients is expensive and time-consuming. It’s far easier to keep existing clients happy and work towards selling them a larger yacht. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about A Hull of a Deal Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about A Hull of a Deal

Other standard forms are in use, but the poorly drafted and incomplete MYBA Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) remains the standard agreement for the sale and purchase of yachts, used by brokers large and small, whether a member of that organisation or not. Before considering what needs to be added, let’s look at what’s there at the outset. Home Handbook Buying / / MYBA MOA Clause by Clause 9 December 2022 Last revised minutes 11 Reading time Other standard forms are in use, but the poorly drafted and incomplete MYBA Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) remains the standard agreement for the sale and purchase of yachts, used by brokers large and small, whether a member of that organisation or not. Before considering what needs to be added, let’s look at what’s there at the outset. minutes 11 Reading time 9 December 2022 Last revised Other standard forms are in use, but the poorly drafted and incomplete MYBA Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) remains the standard agreement for the sale and purchase of yachts, used by brokers large and small, whether a member of that organisation or not. Before considering what needs to be added, let’s look at what’s there at the outset. The article focuses on the MYBA Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) November 2008 edition, which is the most commonly used contract in large yacht sales and purchases. The MOA should not be accepted at face value, and it is crucial to amend and supplement it before any transaction takes place. Clause 14 allows the seller to negotiate with other potential buyers as long as no commitments are made, even after signing the MOA. Clause 15 removes the statutory buyer protection provided by the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended), and it is important to clarify the meaning of "warranty" in this context. The list of things that the vessel should be "free and clear of" in Clause 15 should be expanded to avoid ambiguity and potential disputes. Clause 16 highlights the importance of maintaining an inventory of the vessel's items, especially for larger vessels, and clarifies the consequences of rejecting the inventory. Clause 17 emphasizes the mandatory nature of making the vessel available for sea trials and surveys, and precautions should be taken to prevent conflicting charter arrangements. Clause 18 requires the seller to provide specific documents known as "Addendum One" that prove compliance with regulations and establish the vessel's value and validity of the sale. The list of things that the vessel should be "free and clear of" in Clause 15 should be expanded to avoid ambiguity and potential disputes. Clause 16 highlights the importance of maintaining an inventory of the vessel's items, especially for larger vessels, and clarifies the consequences of rejecting the inventory. Clause 17 emphasizes the mandatory nature of making the vessel available for sea trials and surveys, and precautions should be taken to prevent conflicting charter arrangements. Clause 18 requires the seller to provide specific documents known as "Addendum One" that prove compliance with regulations and establish the vessel's value and validity of the sale. The article focuses on the MYBA Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) November 2008 edition, which is the most commonly used contract in large yacht sales and purchases. The MOA should not be accepted at face value, and it is crucial to amend and supplement it before any transaction takes place. Clause 14 allows the seller to negotiate with other potential buyers as long as no commitments are made, even after signing the MOA. Clause 15 removes the statutory buyer protection provided by the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended), and it is important to clarify the meaning of "warranty" in this context. This article considers the MYBA MOA, clause by clause. We’re looking at the November 2008 edition, because this is most commonly used. It’s available online. The February 2005 edition is still occasionally used and a 2021 electronic edition, featuring a few nips and tucks, has been published but is not yet in widespread use. The key takeaway is that, despite its official appearance, the MOA must not be accepted at face value, and no transaction should ever take place without the MOA being amended and supplemented. The MOA clauses themselves are in an illogical sequence, but are looked at in numerical order nevertheless. CLAUSES 1-13 The first two pages contain Clauses 1 to 13 in the form of boxes for the relevant details. A format commonly used in the commercial shipping sector. The attention to detail is immediately obvious: assuming “G.R.T.” is meant to mean Gross Register(ed) Tonnage, this is a term which was consigned to history long ago by the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships 1969. Clause 1 refers to "banking days" without reference to a specific location. And it may be wise to not to leave Clause 5 blank in the context of Clause 25 and Clause 38 : buyers may not want to pay a pay a deposit to the seller’s statutorily unregulated broker. CLAUSE 14 While this clause commits seller to the sale process, the seller isn’t prevented from negotiating with other would-be buyers – as long as no commitments are made with any such third party. Having signed the MOA, if the buyer comes under pressure from a broker to improve on the deal – as other would-be buyers are circling – this can be ignored. CLAUSE 15 While, in law, the term “warranty” has a specific meaning, it appears under this context – confusingly – that it simply means “represents”. This clause is important as the ordinary statutory buyer protection provided by the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended) is normally removed by Clause 34 . Compared to the sale agreements for trading ships, the list of things which has to be “free and clear of” is a bit simplistic and limited – and should be expanded to include charters, mortgages, writs and port state and other administrative detentions rather than leave scope for argument over what “encumbrance” encompasses in the context of the MOA. The seller needs to ensure that anything of this kind is affecting the vessel: it’s not good enough to expect that the buyer will come across details of these in the public domain. Releasing the vessel from such encumbrance is a prerequisite to the sale completing as set out in Clause 30 . Where any such only comes to light after completion, the seller obliged to indemnify the buyer – which is of no use where the seller’s a company the only asset of which was the vessel just sold. Hence the need for a guarantee from a bank or the seller’s beneficial owner. Under Clause 15, the seller also represents that it(or he/she) is the legal registered owner of the vessel, with title to and the right to sell the vessel – and this will remain the case right up to the point of delivery to the buyer. This is the case anyway under section 12(1) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended) in spite of Clause 34 which only excludes statutory protection “in relation to the VESSEL, fault or errors in her description or her quality or her fitness, for any particular purpose”. CLAUSE 16 The larger the vessel, the greater the inventory, and the longer it’s going to take to compile or update and check. This should be produced or updated as soon as the vessel is placed on the market, having regard to Clause 21 , as the buyer’s surveyor will need to check the items off against it as part of the pre-purchase survey. Once agreed on, the inventory forms part of the sale agreement. Clause 16 is silent as to consequences of rejection of the inventory by the buyer, but it seems likely that the agreement itself will be unaffected – and it’s still open for the buyer to reject under Clause 26 . Regarding significant works of art, sculptures, equipment, tenders and toys, it’s helpful to obtain a clear understanding of what’s staying on board (and, as importantly, what's not) before the MOA is signed. CLAUSE 17 While self-explanatory, this clause makes it clear that making the vessel available for a Clause 26 sea trial and Clause 27 survey is mandatory, not a nice-to-have, and the seller must take care that a charter broker does not arrange for a charter to take place which might prevent this. CLAUSE 18 While this clause simply sets out that the “Addendum One” documents must be provided by the seller, the MOA doesn’t come with Addendum One – or any addenda for that matter. The documents are so much more than mere paperwork: they are evidence that the vessel complies with certain regulations. Non-compliance may require major works to be carried out. Certain documents will be needed for re-registration and for proving title – without which the vessel may be worth less or even worthless. The sale itself could be invalidated where the correct corporate authorities and powers of attorney aren’t in place. And such documents may need to be authenticated in a particular way(s) in order to be accepted by the vessel’s new or existing flag state. CLAUSE 19 Unusually for the MOA, this clause is self-explanatory. Keep in mind that “berthing fees and crew’s wages” are implicitly not an exhaustive list. CLAUSE 20 This clause makes clear that where the seller fails to deliver the vessel (that is, in the legal sense of the word ‘deliver’) per Clause 21 or documentation per Clause 18 then all bets are off and the agreement is cancelled. However, as will be seen with regard to Clause 30 , all that’s needed with broad compliance with Addendum One - there’s no mention of the documentation needing to be authenticated as the buyer may require – or even to be effective at all. CLAUSE 21 The vessel must be delivered in the condition it was in at the time of the Clause 9 / Clause 26 sea trial and Clause 9 / Clause 27 condition survey, making this a sale of the vessel on an ‘as was’ basis – not ‘as-is’. ‘Delivery’ in this clause means the transfer of physical possession, rather than the vessel being moved. The vessel may have to be delivered elsewhere than at its usual mooring – usually for tax purposes – after which it’ll head straight back to its berth. While the financial consequences for the buyer of having the vessel delivered in the wrong place could lead to an unexpected Value Added Tax liability of up to 25% of the sale price, it seems that delivering elsewhere than that stated in Clause 11 will only entitle the buyer to claim damages. By contrast, the delivery date is a contractual condition breach of which allows the buyer to cancel the agreement: this is clear from the use of the phrase “time being of the essence” in Clause 12 . How this element of Clause 21 is affected by Clause 35 - which deals with force majeure events - isn't clear. By listing in Clause 21 various specific items which are to be included in the sale, those items not listed are, arguably, excluded. It would have been better simply to state “with everything belonging to the VESSEL on board and on shore” or some such – at least the scope for disagreement would have been reduced. CLAUSE 22 As risk of loss of, or damage to, the vessel passes under this clause immediately upon delivery, the buyer must make sure that suitable cover has been obtained well in advance. CLAUSE 23 This may seem like an obvious provision, but keep in mind that where the seller is a company which is in liquidation it may require authorisation to sell the yacht. CLAUSE 24 The companion to Clause 14 this clause commits the buyer to the sale process. The buyer may only exit from the deal - should the buyer have a change of heart - will be as the agreement allows. CLAUSE 25 While the “four banking days” clock only begins to tick once the agreement has been signed, as with Clause 1 , the term “banking days” isn’t defined in terms of any particular country’s banks. And that’s a problem as a failure to pay is breach of contract, allowing the seller to terminate and sue for damages – which could be an amount equivalent to the unpaid deposit. It’s not the case that the deposit needs to be paid for the agreement to come into effect. It’s also unclear whether the date of signature is included or excluded in the four-day period. Buyers must be aware of, and take into account, the time taken for identity checks and anti-money laundering to be carried out. CLAUSE 26 One of the many ways in which the drafting of the MOA leaves much to be desired is Clauses 26 and 27 – which between presuppose that the vessel is in the water at the outset. Of course, large yachts can be out of the water for months at a time. No sensible owner would normally place his or her pride and joy on the market while she’s on the hard: often parts of the interior will have been covered-up or removed while works are ongoing, but if the sale is urgent there may be no choice. Where the vessel is out of the water, the necessary amendments will have to be detailed. Assuming the vessel is in the water when the MOA is agreed, then the seller must make her available for a sea trial of up to four hours. This does not mean that the seller is obliged to make all necessary arrangements. It’s unclear, for example, who would be responsible for ordering pilots if required. While this clause fails to mention this, the buyer would be well advised to arrange for a surveyor to attend to examine certain aspects of the vessel’s performance which can’t be tested out of the water. How easily the main engine(s) and gensets start, and how much smoke is emitted at various engine temperatures, for example, typically can’t be tested as the engine’s heat exchangers require the vessel to be in the water, and the engines should be tested under load. Following the sea trial, the buyer may then elect not to go ahead with the purchase – although it’s not clear whether the grounds for this are for any reason (i.e. the saloon cushions are the wrong colour or a similar trivial reason) or whether the reason must relate to the performance of the vessel during the sea trial. To be effective, the buyer must ensure that the rejection is: In writing; To the seller or broker; Within 24 hours of the sea trial; and Submitted as a formal notice in compliance with Clause 43 . CLAUSE 27 It should not be underestimated how difficult it can be to find at short notice a suitably qualified surveyor, appropriately insured, with availability, who the buyer can be reasonably confident will be thorough and independent. It may not be advisable to go along with the seller’s broker’s suggestion. Yard space and facilities may also be a premium – especially out of season. It is also usually be advisable for samples to taken of the engine’s lubricating oil for laboratory analysis. Elemental spectroscopy of the oil can reveal premature engine wear, while the presence of water might indicate a gasket or heat exchanger seal failure. Combined with testing for acidity a picture can be built of the seller’s crew’s approach to equipment maintenance. Differences in results for two identical engines can be an obvious cause for concern. It’s crucial to consider timescales for surveying and testing before dates are set in stone in the MOA. The object of the survey is only to discover defects which haven’t already been disclosed to the buyer in writing – although the buyer may wish to ascertain the nature and extent of disclosed defects. It’s not clear when the nature and extent of such defects is such that it could be considered that these defects haven’t actually been disclosed. While a “defect” is determined in Clause 27 to be a defect which “affect(s) the operational integrity of the VESSEL or her machinery or her systems or renders the VESSEL unseaworthy”. There’s no definition of “operational integrity” either in the MOA or in the law generally. Unseaworthiness is also not defined in the MOA. Broadly, as a matter of law, a vessel is unseaworthy when she is not reasonably fit in all respects to encounter the ordinary perils of the seas – but this still leaves plenty of scope for factual and legal argument. Where such an undisclosed defect is found by the surveyor, the buyer must choose one of the option given in (a) paragraph (a), bearing in mind that such notice must be given: In writing; To the seller or broker; Within seven days of the completion of the survey; and In conformity with Clause 43 . If the buyer elects for the seller to carry out remedial works, then it would be wise to set a realistic date for the completion of these, rather than just rely on the “without undue delay” provision. CLAUSE 28 This clause makes clear that the notice provisions in Clause 26 and Clause 27 must be complied with to the letter – failing which the vessel will have been accepted. CLAUSE 29 While it is hard to imagine circumstances where the vessel is damaged as a result of the captain complying with a request from the buyer during a sea trial, given the captains duty of care to the seller, it is conceivable that the buyer’s surveyor causes damage. This underlines the importance of checking that the surveyor carries suitable insurance. CLAUSE 30 Completion (more often known as ‘closing’) is the final stage of the sale and purchase process, during which payment of the balance is made, and the vessel and documents are delivered to the buyer. Subject to any Clause 27 notice or Clause 35 force majeure event, the Clause 12 completion date is the date on which the buyer must pay the balance. There is no mention of this also being the date upon which the seller must receive the funds, but it’s clearly in everyone’s interests for payment to be made as quickly as possible. The currency, bank details and payment method should be agreed in Addendum One and expressly made conditions of the agreement to be strictly adhered with. Payment is required as soon as the Addendum One documents have been tendered to the buyer – seemingly even if they are defective in terms of their effectiveness or authentication, as long as they comply with their descriptions set out in Addendum One. CLAUSE 31 This clause elaborates on Clause 25 . It’s odd that these two clauses aren’t drafted as a single clause for greater clarity. CLAUSE 32 This clause elaborates on Clause 23 . Again, it’s odd that these two clauses aren’t also drafted as a single clause for greater clarity. CLAUSE 33 While it used to be considered bad luck to change the name of a yacht, the MOA copies the now standard practice in the shipping industry to change name upon change of ownership. It’s as good to be aware of this clause, given that it is the default position. Given the amount of equipment on board bearing the yacht’s name, logo or monogram, the expense of compliance isn’t to be underestimated. An oil tanker’s name can be changed with a paintbrush: a modern yacht will almost certainly have a custom-made, illuminated name which must be installed and the immediate surrounding area filled and repainted as required. The standard seven days may be no way near long enough. That said, the seller is going to face an uphill task in proving what losses may have followed from any delay in remaining. CLAUSE 34 In the normal course of events, sections 13, 14 and 15A of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended) will apply to the sale and purchase of the vessel. Under these sections, goods sold must corresponded with the seller’s description of them, they must be of satisfactory quality, fit for purpose, etc. But parties are free, subject to certain statutory limitations, to agree to exclude such provisions. And this is what Clause 34 aims to do. It succeeds in this aim, albeit in respect of corporate buyers : individual buyers are ‘consumers’ meaning that these sections cannot be excluded. This clause does not affect the seller’s Clause 15 warranty. CLAUSE 35 This clause sets out what the parties are to do where certain external events beyond their control delay the sea trial, survey or closing. As the law aims to ensure that the parties carry through with the deal, force majeure clauses are interpreted restrictively and against the party seeking to rely on them. And even then, that party must then prove that it used reasonable endeavours to minimise the delay. CLAUSE 36 This is a standard so-called boilerplate clause, which are normally placed after all the commercial terms. But MYBA, it seems, likes to do things differently. CLAUSE 37 Though detailed, Clause 37 is self-explanatory and requires no further explanation. CLAUSE 38 While Clause 5 presupposes that the stakeholder will be a broker, the seller should think long and hard about whether it’s wise to place money at the disposal of a statutorily unregulated party which is acting for the buyer. It is increasingly common for funds to be placed with the buyer’s lawyer – which also alleviates the broker from the increasing bureaucracy associated with satisfying anti-money laundering rules. Even then, the choice of lawyer is important. CLAUSE 39 This otherwise self-explanatory clause only applies where the parties agree that the bottom should be painted with antifouling and anodes replaced. Notably, it makes no mention of more modern and environmentally-friendly antifouling wraps. Where there is significant fouling but the sacrificial anodes do not require replacing, there could be a cathodic grounding fault which the surveyor should investigate. The anodes are implicitly those on the hull, shafts and rudders – rather than those within the raw-water side of the engines’ cooling systems. CLAUSE 40 Arbitration is a way of setline disputes in private, which is no less effective than going through the public courts potentially in the media spotlight. Missing from the MOA is a specific reference to the arbitration being conducted in accordance with the London Maritime Arbitrators Association (LMAA) terms – which allow for different levels of procedural complexity according to the amount in issue. CLAUSE 41–44 These are standard boilerplate clauses, but the reference to the “telefax” is now obviously very outdated and needs amending. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Britannia's Rules Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Britannia's Rules

When a deal’s on the table, it can be annoying to be asked not only for endless documents but for documents which must be authenticated in seemingly arcane ways. In the case of Bills of Sale, there’s no often no choice: it’s what many ship registries require for (re)registration. Providing authenticated documents doesn’t have to take too much additional time or resources: it just takes planning and forethought. Home Handbook Selling / / Document Authentication 8 August 2024 Last revised minutes 6 Reading time When a deal’s on the table, it can be annoying to be asked not only for endless documents but for documents which must be authenticated in seemingly arcane ways. In the case of Bills of Sale, there’s no often no choice: it’s what many ship registries require for (re)registration. Providing authenticated documents doesn’t have to take too much additional time or resources: it just takes planning and forethought. minutes 6 Reading time 8 August 2024 Last revised When a deal’s on the table, it can be annoying to be asked not only for endless documents but for documents which must be authenticated in seemingly arcane ways. In the case of Bills of Sale, there’s no often no choice: it’s what many ship registries require for (re)registration. Providing authenticated documents doesn’t have to take too much additional time or resources: it just takes planning and forethought. Ensuring document authenticity is crucial to prevent fraud and confirm the validity and irreversibility of transactions, particularly in high value purchases like yachts. As it's easy to fake documents, multiple methods and cross-checks are necessary to build confidence in their authenticity, though no method is fool-proof. A certified copy is a true copy of an original document, usually certified by a lawyer or company director, but it doesn’t confirm the original document’s genuineness. Notarisation is the verification, certifying, and sealing of documents, which is mandatory in some jurisdictions to make documents valid and enforceable. Legalisation involves government bodies authenticating the signature or seal on a document, especially for international use, often requiring an apostille certificate if both countries are Hague Convention signatories. Certification must be done by authorized individuals like lawyers or company officials, and deliberate false certification can lead to serious legal consequences. The correct wording and format for certification and notarisation must be used, often specified by the third party requiring the document. Notaries follow strict procedures, including checking IDs and corporate documents, and may require translations for documents in foreign languages. Even notarised and legalised documents can be forged, so further verification through online searches and government registers is recommended. Proper planning and adherence to authentication requirements can prevent delays and ensure compliance with legal and registration needs, particularly for documents like Bills of Sale. Certification must be done by authorized individuals like lawyers or company officials, and deliberate false certification can lead to serious legal consequences. The correct wording and format for certification and notarisation must be used, often specified by the third party requiring the document. Notaries follow strict procedures, including checking IDs and corporate documents, and may require translations for documents in foreign languages. Even notarised and legalised documents can be forged, so further verification through online searches and government registers is recommended. Proper planning and adherence to authentication requirements can prevent delays and ensure compliance with legal and registration needs, particularly for documents like Bills of Sale. Ensuring document authenticity is crucial to prevent fraud and confirm the validity and irreversibility of transactions, particularly in high value purchases like yachts. As it's easy to fake documents, multiple methods and cross-checks are necessary to build confidence in their authenticity, though no method is fool-proof. A certified copy is a true copy of an original document, usually certified by a lawyer or company director, but it doesn’t confirm the original document’s genuineness. Notarisation is the verification, certifying, and sealing of documents, which is mandatory in some jurisdictions to make documents valid and enforceable. Legalisation involves government bodies authenticating the signature or seal on a document, especially for international use, often requiring an apostille certificate if both countries are Hague Convention signatories. When yachts are bought, there’s much which needs to be proven by the seller before the buyer feels comfortable handing over a considerable sum. Who is the vessel actually owned by? Has the owner (if a company) formally resolved to sell the vessel – and appointed an individual to represent it at the closing and sign the necessary paperwork? The list goes on. And that list must be included in the sale agreement. To be presented with documents is one thing, but how do buyers know that such documents are what they appear to be? This is especially important when it comes to a selling company’s incorporation and powers: originals of the vessel’s own documentation can be provided, but the selling company will not usually be providing originals of its incorporating documentation. No single method of authentication is foolproof, as the authenticating documents, certificates, seals and signatures can themselves all be forged with ease. It’s about building sufficient confidence, combining different approaches and cross-checking with other sources where possible. It’s always good to avoid unnecessary bureaucracy and expense, but keep in mind that third parties, such as yacht registries, may need documents to be authenticated in a particular way. Whatever methods are chosen, these need to be agreed upon at the outset. Now let’s look at the main methods. CERTIFICATION What is a certified copy? A certified copy is an accurate, complete and current copy (usually a photocopy, scan or photo) of an original document. It’s used when it’s not practical or possible to produce the original document. The certified copy will include a statement that it is a true copy of the original as at the date certified. Crucially, it does not certify that the original document is genuine, only that it is a true copy of the original. Who can certify a document? The certifying person is usually a lawyer or, in the case of a document relating to a company, a director or secretary of that company. If the document is also needed by a third party then it’s worth checking with that third party who can and can’t certify. In the United Kingdom, if an authorised person deliberately falsely certifies a document as being a true copy of the original, they can go to prison for up to 18 months. What’s the correct format? Any third party needing the copy may also specify the wording used. If not, the following wording is usually acceptable: “I [insert full name of the certifying person] certify that this document is a true and complete copy of the original.” In the case of photographic identification, the following could be used: “I [insert full name of the certifying person] certify that this document is a true and complete copy of the original and a true likeness of the individual [insert name].” The certifying person will then need to sign, write his or her full name under the signature, and add their law firm’s name and address. Finally, the date is added. The exact wording and format can vary, but the essential elements must be there. Provided all pages are attached together, then there’s not normally any need to certify each page – with the notable exception of Powers of Attorney, all pages of which must, in the UK, be certified "I certify this is a true and complete copy of the corresponding page of the original". Fees for certification There is no set fee for certification: fees must be fair and reasonable and will reflect time spent. NOTARISATION What is notarisation? The job of a notary (also known as a notary public) is to prepare, attest or certify documents (originals or copies) under an official seal, especially for use in certain jurisdictions. Notaries are usually (but not necessarily) qualified lawyers. Why is notarisation needed? Notarisation may seem unnecessary – given that a far wider range of professionals can just certify copies – but it’s simply part of the legal landscape in some countries. Failing to notarise can render a document invalid or unenforceable. What does notarisation involve? At the outset, notaries must also comply with anti-money laundering (AML) and data protection legislation, so it’s useful to have documents likely to be needed readily available so as to avoid unnecessary delays. Individuals involved will need to provide photographic identification. Where an individual presents corporate documents for notarisation, the company’s constitutional documents must also be presented, along with a Power of Attorney empowering that individual, and the appropriate resolutions. The relevant document is read in full in the notary's presence. If a foreign language document is to be notarised, a translation may be needed. A notary can only authenticate a document drawn up in a foreign language if they are satisfied as to its meaning. Scrivener notaries must be fluent in at least one language other than English. Once satisfied, the notary adds his or her notarial certificate to the document being notarised. The specific form of the certificate will depends on who needs the document to be notarised, and this information needs to be obtained beforehand. The notarial certificate is then signed by the notary and sealed with the notary's official seal. The notary keeps a set of the originals, or copies of all documents that they make, which then serves as a permanent record. These records must be made available to anyone with a right to see them including the notary's client and any other party involved. The final document should not be taken apart (for example, to scan) as notarised documents which have been tampered may not be accepted by the party requiring it. E-notarisation is available in some jurisdictions, which can make the whole proves much quicker. LEGALISATION What is legalisation? Certification and even notarisation isn’t good enough for some recipients. After all, who’s to say that the certifier or notary is duly qualified? And so it is that such document (in practice, normally notarised) may need to be ‘legalised’. This is the process by which one government body authenticates the signature, seal and/or stamp to the satisfaction of another country’s government body. As with the other forms of authentication, a failure to legalise a document may mean that the document is invalid or unenforceable (or both) in the jurisdiction where it is to be relied on. Who can legalise a document? Who needs to legalise the document in one country depends on the whether that county, and the recipient’s country, have both ratified the Hague Convention of 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents (commonly known as the Hague Convention). 91 countries are signed-up at present. Where both are Hague Convention countries, then a standardised ‘apostille’ certificate can be obtained, relatively quickly and inexpensively. In the UK, this is done by sending the document to the Legalisation Office of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO). The FCDO checks the notary's or certifier’s name and signature against its register. If all’s in order, an apostille is applied to the document and it’s returned. The increasing use of e-apostilles is reducing fees and turnaround time, but it’s worth checking how long it could take in advance and planning accordingly. Where one country isn’t a Hague Convention signatory, then it’ll be up to the recipient’s country’s local embassy or consulate to legalise the document. Under their rules, it may also be necessary to obtain a Hague Convention apostille beforehand. The parties can arrange legalisation themselves. Legalisation can also be arranged by a notary on the parties' behalf. This is often preferable as the notary will be familiar with the process. FURTHER VERIFICATION Certified copies, notarial certificates and apostilles can all be, and occasionally are, forged. At least apostilles issued by the FCDO, for example, can be checked online on a special UK government website, if the apostille date and number are available. More broadly, it makes sense to conduct broad online searches into individuals and companies. Increasingly, company documents can be viewed on, or downloaded directly from, online government company registers and/or third party corporate information providers. The UK has long-since provided a wealth of company information. Now many classic offshore jurisdictions also provide extensive information which can be used to cross-check directorships and constitutional documents. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Preparing Your Crew Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Preparing Your Crew

While the lender retains so much security, it also retains liability as registered owner, so it’s perhaps not surprising that pure leasing isn’t more popular. It does form the basis of various VAT-reduction and deferment schemes. Home Handbook Financing / / Leasing Overview 22 October 2020 Last revised minutes 2 Reading time While the lender retains so much security, it also retains liability as registered owner, so it’s perhaps not surprising that pure leasing isn’t more popular. It does form the basis of various VAT-reduction and deferment schemes. Such schemes come and go, and are not covered here. Feel free to contact us regarding tax avoidance. minutes 2 Reading time 22 October 2020 Last revised While the lender retains so much security, it also retains liability as registered owner, so it’s perhaps not surprising that pure leasing isn’t more popular. It does form the basis of various VAT-reduction and deferment schemes. Such schemes come and go, and are not covered here. Feel free to contact us regarding tax avoidance. The arrangement involves a bank or leasing company (lessor) buying a yacht and becoming its legal owner. The lessor then bareboat charters the yacht to the lessee (owner) for an agreed period of time. The lessee pays instalments equivalent to the full value of the yacht plus a return on capital instead of interest on a loan. The lessee is considered the regulatory owner of the yacht. The lessee has exclusive possession and control of the yacht and must keep it in good working order. Insurance against loss or damage is the lessee's responsibility. The lessee is entitled to the warranties provided by the yard. The lessor is indemnified against liabilities related to being the registered owner. The lessee cannot sell the yacht as they do not own it. To terminate the lease, the lessee must pay the remaining instalments or a cancellation fee. The lessee has exclusive possession and control of the yacht and must keep it in good working order. Insurance against loss or damage is the lessee's responsibility. The lessee is entitled to the warranties provided by the yard. The lessor is indemnified against liabilities related to being the registered owner. The lessee cannot sell the yacht as they do not own it. To terminate the lease, the lessee must pay the remaining instalments or a cancellation fee. The arrangement involves a bank or leasing company (lessor) buying a yacht and becoming its legal owner. The lessor then bareboat charters the yacht to the lessee (owner) for an agreed period of time. The lessee pays instalments equivalent to the full value of the yacht plus a return on capital instead of interest on a loan. The lessee is considered the regulatory owner of the yacht. The bank or leasing company (known as the ‘lessor’) buys the yacht and is the legal, registered owner. Then the lessor, in effect, bareboat charters (so, without crew) it to the ‘owner’ (known as the ‘lessee’), over an agreed period of time. The lessee pays instalments equivalent to the full value of the asset over the term of the lease plus a return on capital to the lender, instead of interest on a loan. At the end of the lease, after the final payment has been made, the asset may be transferred to the lessee. FEATURES Typically, the lessee: Is the ‘owner’ of the yacht for regulatory purposes; Has exclusive possession and control of the yacht; Will be obliged to keep the yacht in good working order; Must insure the yacht against loss or damage; Will be entitled to the yard’s warranties; Must indemnify the lessor against liabilities stemming from the lessor being the registered owner; Cannot sell the yacht as it does not own it; and Must pay the remaining instalments, or a cancellation fee, to terminate the lease agreement. OTHER FORMS The Statement of Standard Accounting Practice SSAP 21 (Accounting for leases and hire purchase contracts) defines a finance lease as a lease which transfers ‘substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset to the lessee’. The distinction is drawn with operating leases, common for aircraft, plant and equipment, where the risk in relation to the asset falls on the lessor rather than the lessee. An operating lease will be treated as being off balance sheet in the lessee’s accounts, and at the expiry of the lease term, the lessee is obliged to return the asset to the lessor and the asset’s residual value is of no concern to the lessee. Only relevant to smaller yachts and tenders, SSAP 21 also distinguishes a hire purchase contract, which allows the hirer to acquire legal title by exercising an option to purchase the asset – normally having paid an agreed number of instalments. SSAP 21 prescribes the accounting treatments, but note that accounting standards are being developed which will supersede SSAP 21. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Loans Overview Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Loans Overview

As soon as you enter any country’s waters, you’re under an obligation to abide by all their laws. Detailed onboard examinations are used to check compliance. Port State Control (PSC) is the system of inspection by officials to check vessels’ condition and operation. Safety, security, environmental protection and seafarer welfare are the areas of interest. Port States can require defects to be put right, and detain vessels if necessary. This is all separate, and in addition to, any consideration of the tax status of the owner, beneficial owner and yacht. Home Handbook Regulation / / Port State Control 19 June 2011 Last revised minutes 3 Reading time As soon as you enter any country’s waters, you’re under an obligation to abide by all their laws. Detailed onboard examinations are used to check compliance. Port State Control (PSC) is the system of inspection by officials to check vessels’ condition and operation. Safety, security, environmental protection and seafarer welfare are the areas of interest. Port States can require defects to be put right, and detain vessels if necessary. This is all separate, and in addition to, any consideration of the tax status of the owner, beneficial owner and yacht. minutes 3 Reading time 19 June 2011 Last revised As soon as you enter any country’s waters, you’re under an obligation to abide by all their laws. Detailed onboard examinations are used to check compliance. Port State Control (PSC) is the system of inspection by officials to check vessels’ condition and operation. Safety, security, environmental protection and seafarer welfare are the areas of interest. Port States can require defects to be put right, and detain vessels if necessary. This is all separate, and in addition to, any consideration of the tax status of the owner, beneficial owner and yacht. The Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (Paris MoU) includes European Union coastal countries, Canada, Croatia, Norway, and Russia, among others. The Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure & Environment provides the secretariat for the Paris MoU. The Paris MoU introduced the New Inspection Regime (NIR) which aims to inspect 100% of all ships, including yachts, visiting ports in the Paris MoU region over a three-year period. Yachts are now included in the NIR and are subject to assessments regarding safety, health, and the environment. Vessels are categorized into High Risk Ships, Standard Risk Ships, and Low Risk Ships, determining the frequency of inspections. The risk categorization is based on factors such as previous inspections, vessel type and age, the yacht's manager's performance, and the country of registry. Inspections are not meant to disrupt cruising schedules but are necessary for compliance. Inspections focus on training, management systems, and the physical integrity of the yacht to ensure safety for the owner, guests, and crew. Preparation is key to a hassle-free inspection, including compliance with relevant rules, crew training, and detailed guidelines. Safety and security procedures must be followed, and honesty is crucial during inspections, as falsifying records or lying to officials is a serious offence. The risk categorization is based on factors such as previous inspections, vessel type and age, the yacht's manager's performance, and the country of registry. Inspections are not meant to disrupt cruising schedules but are necessary for compliance. Inspections focus on training, management systems, and the physical integrity of the yacht to ensure safety for the owner, guests, and crew. Preparation is key to a hassle-free inspection, including compliance with relevant rules, crew training, and detailed guidelines. Safety and security procedures must be followed, and honesty is crucial during inspections, as falsifying records or lying to officials is a serious offence. The Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (Paris MoU) includes European Union coastal countries, Canada, Croatia, Norway, and Russia, among others. The Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure & Environment provides the secretariat for the Paris MoU. The Paris MoU introduced the New Inspection Regime (NIR) which aims to inspect 100% of all ships, including yachts, visiting ports in the Paris MoU region over a three-year period. Yachts are now included in the NIR and are subject to assessments regarding safety, health, and the environment. Vessels are categorized into High Risk Ships, Standard Risk Ships, and Low Risk Ships, determining the frequency of inspections. All European Union coastal countries, and Canada, Croatia, Norway, and Russia, are party to the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (Paris MoU). The Hague-based Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure & Environment provides the secretariat. There are 6 other MoU blocs worldwide. INSPECTION REGIME The Paris MoU New Inspection Regime (NIR) introduced a target of inspecting, over any three-year period, 100% of all the ships visiting ports and anchorages in the Paris MoU region. Yachts have been lumped-in with trading ships and ferries. The NIR applies to “ships”, which includes all yachts. Where a yacht is so small, or is not chartered, such that parts of the various maritime conventions (SOLAS, MARPOL, etc) do not apply, the PSC’s task is now to “…to assess whether the ship is of an acceptable standard in regard to safety, health or the environment.” Further, in assessing such vessels, account must be taken, “…of such factors as the length and nature of the intended voyage or service, the size and type of the ship…”. All vessels are deemed to fall into one of three risk profiles. High Risk Ships must be inspected 5 to 6 months after the last inspection, Standard Risk Ships 10 to 12 months after the last inspection and Low Risk Ships 24 to 36 months after the last inspection. Additional inspections, however, can also be triggered by overriding or unexpected factors. Time windows for the next periodic inspection re-start after any inspection. Where a window has come and gone without checks having been carried – because a yacht has not called at a participating port – that yacht will automatically be targeted on arrival. The risk categorisation is based on a number of factors – including the details and results of previous Paris MoU inspections, the vessels’ type and age, the performance of the yacht’s manager and the country of registry. In fact, for a yacht to be a Low Risk Ship, the flag must be approved and appear on the annual Paris MoU White List. The United States, Switzerland, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Panama, and the Netherlands Antilles all fail to make the List. Unless a yacht is a High Risk Ship, port officials have the option of undertaking an initial inspection – then deciding whether or not to carry out a detailed inspection. INSPECTIONS Inspections are not intended to interrupt cruising schedules. They are carried out because they have to be. Most officials in most ports will be polite and efficient, but they can make life difficult if they choose to. While nearly all large yachts are extremely well presented, it is the training and management systems – as well as the physical integrity of the vessel – which is being examined. Poorly-run vessels can still present a hazard to the owner, guests and crew: perhaps it is better that these issues are picked up sooner rather than later. PREPARATION It’s up to the yacht’s captain and manager to ensure that the relevant rules are being complied with and that all crewmembers know what do in an emergency. Detailed guidelines and instructions should already be laid out, where these are mandatory, in the Safety Management System and Ship Security Plan, but it’s how these and other forms of pre-prepared guidance translate into reality that’s key to a fast and hassle-free inspection. First impressions are crucial. Do all the deckhands and steward(ess)s automatically know to be especially courteous with the PSC inspector? They may not be wearing an official uniform, and could just be yet another supplier. They may not take kindly to being told to remove their shoes – so a box of disposable shoe covers kept by the passarelle will get the process off on the right foot. Safety and security procedures must be followed at all times: it is the checks that count – not the ticks. Even where a guest may be inconvenienced by a safety briefing, this will be as nothing compared to the yacht being detained later. Falsifying logs and records, or lying to officials, will constitute a serious criminal offence. It is always better to admit a failing than to cover it up: the inspectors have seen it all before. Members would be well advised to discuss the possibility of inspection with captains and managers sooner rather than later. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about The ISM Code Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about The ISM Code

Unavailable at present Latest Position Rapid Brokers Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 67 m Length Italia srl Builder 2000 Build year 608 Gross tonnage United Kingdom Registry Particulars Simulator

Yachts bring employees together in close proximity, for long periods, working under pressure, like no other. Employers have always owed crewmembers various duties of care, but recent British legal developments oblige owners to be proactive in preventing sexual harassment. Prevention is better than cure. While these changes only apply to a minority of yachts and crewmembers, it's a step in the right direction and provides a useful industry benchmark. Home Handbook Employing / / Harassment Prevention 30 April 2024 Last revised minutes 8 Reading time Yachts bring employees together in close proximity, for long periods, working under pressure, like no other. Employers have always owed crewmembers various duties of care, but recent British legal developments oblige owners to be proactive in preventing sexual harassment. Prevention is better than cure. While these changes only apply to a minority of yachts and crewmembers, it's a step in the right direction and provides a useful industry benchmark. minutes 8 Reading time 30 April 2024 Last revised Yachts bring employees together in close proximity, for long periods, working under pressure, like no other. Employers have always owed crewmembers various duties of care, but recent British legal developments oblige owners to be proactive in preventing sexual harassment. Prevention is better than cure. While these changes only apply to a minority of yachts and crewmembers, it's a step in the right direction and provides a useful industry benchmark. Yachts create unique working conditions, bringing employees together closely for extended periods under high-pressure situations, making prevention of sexual harassment crucial. The #MeToo movement exposed systemic issues regarding sexual harassment in the workplace, prompting legal reforms to address these failings. Recent legal developments now oblige certain owners to proactively prevent this type of behaviour, emphasizing prevention over remedy. The UK’s Equality Act 2010 defines sexual harassment and places the burden on employers to demonstrate that they took reasonable steps to prevent it. UK employment law applies to crew based on their employment arrangements and connections to Great Britain, with distinctions between peripatetic and expatriate crew. The Act applies to crew working in or adjacent to Great Britain, regardless of their role or the yacht's size, private or commercial. As from October 2024, all employers must take "reasonable steps" to prevent sexual harassment, with significant penalties for non-compliance. The law provides no clear guidance on what constitutes reasonable steps, leaving employers to adopt a risk-based approach. The Equality & Human Rights Commission offers a seven-step guidance for employers, emphasizing policy development, engagement, risk assessment, reporting, training, complaint handling, and addressing third-party harassment. Creating an inclusive and respectful working environment not only fulfils legal obligations but also enhances crew satisfaction, guest experiences, and mitigates retention issues. The Act applies to crew working in or adjacent to Great Britain, regardless of their role or the yacht's size, private or commercial. As from October 2024, all employers must take "reasonable steps" to prevent sexual harassment, with significant penalties for non-compliance. The law provides no clear guidance on what constitutes reasonable steps, leaving employers to adopt a risk-based approach. The Equality & Human Rights Commission offers a seven-step guidance for employers, emphasizing policy development, engagement, risk assessment, reporting, training, complaint handling, and addressing third-party harassment. Creating an inclusive and respectful working environment not only fulfils legal obligations but also enhances crew satisfaction, guest experiences, and mitigates retention issues. Yachts create unique working conditions, bringing employees together closely for extended periods under high-pressure situations, making prevention of sexual harassment crucial. The #MeToo movement exposed systemic issues regarding sexual harassment in the workplace, prompting legal reforms to address these failings. Recent legal developments now oblige certain owners to proactively prevent this type of behaviour, emphasizing prevention over remedy. The UK’s Equality Act 2010 defines sexual harassment and places the burden on employers to demonstrate that they took reasonable steps to prevent it. UK employment law applies to crew based on their employment arrangements and connections to Great Britain, with distinctions between peripatetic and expatriate crew. It’s hard to believe that the #MeToo movement began way back in October 2017. And it’s by October 2024 that employers will have to abide by a set of new rules aimed at preventing sexual harassment in the workplace. The hashtag exposed not only the staggering scale of the problem but how the law was failing employees at every stage. It’s shameful that it’ll have taken seven years. But here we are. THE PRESENT POSITION The Maritime Labour Convention (applicable only to chartered yachts) already mandates that signatory states should take account of the latest version of the Guidance on eliminating shipboard harassment and bullying jointly published by the International Chamber of Shipping and the International Transport Workers’ Federation. That guidance does contain an example policy on general harassment, but it is so vague as to be almost meaningless. The Equality Act 2010 defines sexual harassment as any unwanted conduct of a sexual nature, which has the purpose or effect of violating dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment. Those on the receiving end can bring an employment tribunal claim against their employer (and/or a court claim against their harasser). It’ll then be for the employer to demonstrate that they took “all reasonable steps” to prevent the harassment. In practice, it’s an uphill task to prove that such steps were taken. THE NEW DUTY The Equality Act 2010 has been amended, so that, from 26 October 2024 onwards, all employers must take “reasonable steps” to prevent sexual harassment of employees in the course of their employment. “Sexual harassment” means being subjecting someone to unwanted conduct of a sexual nature - and what constitutes that is for the tribunal to decide on the facts. Of course, sexual harassment is already outlawed, but employers are now under a positive duty to take reasonable steps to prevent it. An allegation of no such steps having been made, employers and are on the backfoot and must prove that they did indeed take such steps. And the new law is non-specific about from whom the crewmember must be protected. So as well as seeking to avoid harassment from fellow crew, reasonable steps must be taken to prevent crewmembers falling victim to unwanted sexual conduct by, say, charter guests. As well as awarding compensation, an employment tribunal may also apply a further uplift of up to 25% where it’s decided that the employer failed to take reasonable steps. This uplift applies to all the compensation awarded for any harassment (whether sexual or not). If the crewmember succeeds in a claim on multiple instances of various types of harassment, the uplift could have a significant effect. APPLICATION TO CREW Broadly, British employment law applies to crewmembers (including captains) ordinarily working in Great Britain. Visiting crews aren’t usually covered. For those working elsewhere, their employment arrangements are key. The law distinguishes between “peripatetic” crew, working on rotation, whose base is in Great Britain and from where they begin their “tours of duty” (who are covered by British employment law) and “expatriate” crew, who live and work abroad. The latter are unlikely to be covered, unless there’s a “sufficient connection” with Great Britain – just holding a UK passport isn’t enough. Employees who do not fit into the above categories, but who have "equally strong" connections with Great Britain and British employment law, might also be covered. There was found to be a sufficient connection, even where a crewmember was employed by a company based outside the UK, on a vessel which never entered UK waters, merely where her salary was paid into a UK bank account, she accounted to HMRC for tax, and the employment agreement was subject to English law and jurisdiction. More specifically (according to The Equality Act 2010 (Work on Ships and Hovercraft) Regulations 2011 ) the relevant parts of the Equality Act 2010 apply to any crewmember working (wholly or partly) within Great Britain or adjacent waters, where: The yacht is UK-registered and has a homeport in Great Britain, or The yacht is EEA member state-registered, and the crewmember is a citizen of Great Britain or of an EEA or designated state, and the legal relationship of the crewmember's employment is located within Great Britain, or the crewmember retains a sufficiently close link with Great Britain. The relevant parts also apply to any crewmember working outside Great Britain and adjacent waters, where: Where the crewmember is working on a yacht which is UK-registered and has a homeport in Great Britain, and The crewmember is a citizen of Great Britain or of an EEA or designated state, and the legal relationship of the crewmember's employment is located within Great Britain, or the crewmember retains a sufficiently close link with Great Britain. Where the Act applies, the crewmember’s role, and the size or use of the yacht (private or commercial) are irrelevant. And it doesn’t matter whether the contract is temporary or permanent – or even just on an informal, casual basis so long as the crewmember works on a personal basis. So dayworkers would be encompassed, but the employees of subcontractors would not. WHAT MUST BE DONE? The new law provides no steer whatsoever on what reasonable steps must be taken. Taking a risk-based approach, the tribunal would have before it a wealthy employer, employing typically young crewmembers, in a confined space, often working long hours and sometimes attending to guests whose inhibitions may have been relaxed by alcohol. So the tribunal’s expectations may be very high. Onboard cultures take time to change, and new policies take time to bed-in, so the time to start taking meaningful, tailored action is now. Helpfully, the Equality & Human Rights Commission has produced some guidance. It’s not definitive, but an employment tribunal could use it as a starting point when considering what steps should have been taken. The seven-step guidance can be summarised, and adapted for owners and managers, as follows. Remember that record-keeping is essential. Step 1: Develop an Effective Policy The policy should state that: All crewmembers are in need of protection, and are subject to and protected by the policy, Sexual harassment is unlawful and will not be tolerated, Harassment or victimisation is likely to lead to disciplinary action up to and including dismissal, and Aggravating factors, such as abuse of power over a more junior colleague, will be taken into account in deciding what disciplinary action will be taken. The policy should also: Define sexual harassment and provide clear examples of it - relevant to the environment of a professionally-crewed yacht, Include an effective procedure for receiving and responding to complaints of harassment, and Provide a commitment to review the policy at regular intervals and to monitor its effectiveness. The policy should go on to address third-party harassment, explaining clearly: That third-party harassment can result in legal liability on the part of the perpetrator and employer, That it will not be tolerated, That crewmembers are encouraged to report it, What steps will be taken to prevent it, and What steps will be taken to remedy a complaint and prevent it from happening again. Step 2: Engage Your Crew Conduct regular crew interviews, anonymous surveys and exit interviews. Captain, manager and the owner’s representative should have known open-door policies. Make sure that all crewmembers are verifiably aware of: How they can report sexual harassment Your sexual harassment policy, and The consequences of breaching the policy. Step 3: Assess & Reduce Risks While many of these will be obvious, you should consider and record factors that might increase the likelihood of sexual harassment and the steps that can be taken to minimise them, such as: Where are the power imbalances? Is there job insecurity for a particular group or role? Are crewmembers working alone? Are guests drinking significant amounts of alcohol? Which crewmembers have guest-facing duties? Is there a lack of diversity in your workforce? Step 4: Reporting Implement a reporting system (an online or independent telephone-based service) that allows crewmembers to raise an issue (anonymously or not). Explain clearly to all crewmembers: What is considered acceptable behaviour, How to recognise sexual harassment, and What to do if they experience or witness it. Step 5: Training Crewmembers should be trained on: What sexual harassment in the workplace looks like, What to do if they experience it, How to handle any complaints of harassment, and How to address third-party harassment from guests, suppliers, etc. Step 6: Actioning a Complaint Act immediately to resolve the complaint, taking into account how the crewmember wants it to be resolved. Respect the confidentiality of all parties. Protect the complainant from ongoing harassment or being victimised or harassed further during an investigation. If a crewmember makes a complaint of harassment that may be a criminal offence, you should speak to the individual about whether they want to report the matter. Only use confidentiality agreements where it is lawful, necessary and appropriate to do so. Always communicate the outcome of the complaint to the complainant in a timely manner. Step 7: Dealing with Third Parties Harassment by a third party, such as a guest or supplier’s employee, should be treated just as seriously as that by a colleague. Employers should take steps to prevent this type of harassment, including putting reporting mechanisms in place or assessing high-risk workplaces where staff might be left alone with guests. THE UPSIDES Owners must not see this change in the law as making life more difficult for them and their captains and managers. (Lack of) crew retention is a thorny, ongoing and expensive issue. Social media groups allow crew (anonymously) to name and shame poorly-managed yachts where unacceptable behaviour goes unchecked. In turn, such yachts will struggle to hire good quality crew to replace those who’ve had enough. Sexual harassment can ferment a toxic onboard atmosphere. By contrast, an inclusive and respectful working environment leads to happier crew and better owner and guest experiences. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Oh Referee! Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Oh Referee!

The first question your naval architect is likely to ask is where your yacht will be registered. That registry’s regulations will do much to determine the design of your yacht. But, beyond that, the registry provides the legal framework for crew employment, and may determine how easily insurance and finance can be obtained. So research this in-depth rather than accepting your architect’s suggestion. Home Handbook Building / / Choose A Flag 10 May 2023 Last revised minutes 4 Reading time The first question your naval architect is likely to ask is where your yacht will be registered. That registry’s regulations will do much to determine the design of your yacht. But, beyond that, the registry provides the legal framework for crew employment, and may determine how easily insurance and finance can be obtained. So research this in-depth rather than accepting your architect’s suggestion. minutes 4 Reading time 10 May 2023 Last revised The first question your naval architect is likely to ask is where your yacht will be registered. That registry’s regulations will do much to determine the design of your yacht. But, beyond that, the registry provides the legal framework for crew employment, and may determine how easily insurance and finance can be obtained. So research this in-depth rather than accepting your architect’s suggestion. Registering a yacht in a country's ship registry determines its nationality, owner's responsibilities, and compliance with laws and regulations. The choice of registry impacts insurance availability, financing options, chartering regulations, taxation requirements, scrutiny from port officials, and service provided. Unusual flags may reduce insurance options and increase premiums. Lenders require high maintenance and safety standards and confidence in the country's rule of law for financing agreements. Chartering requires compliance with international regulations, and certain registries have simplified safety codes for cost-effective compliance. Cabotage rules may require local registration for commercial operations in specific jurisdictions. Temporary Admission allows tax avoidance in the EU for non-commercial use, but specific advice is necessary. Scrutiny by port officials can cause delays and inspections may be prioritized based on flag categorization. Helpful registries with easily accessible regulations and guidance are preferred. Local agents and service providers can assist with overcoming time zone difficulties, but may come with additional costs and risks. Cabotage rules may require local registration for commercial operations in specific jurisdictions. Temporary Admission allows tax avoidance in the EU for non-commercial use, but specific advice is necessary. Scrutiny by port officials can cause delays and inspections may be prioritized based on flag categorization. Helpful registries with easily accessible regulations and guidance are preferred. Local agents and service providers can assist with overcoming time zone difficulties, but may come with additional costs and risks. Registering a yacht in a country's ship registry determines its nationality, owner's responsibilities, and compliance with laws and regulations. The choice of registry impacts insurance availability, financing options, chartering regulations, taxation requirements, scrutiny from port officials, and service provided. Unusual flags may reduce insurance options and increase premiums. Lenders require high maintenance and safety standards and confidence in the country's rule of law for financing agreements. Chartering requires compliance with international regulations, and certain registries have simplified safety codes for cost-effective compliance. With some limited exceptions, all yachts have to be registered in a country’s ship registry, and fly that nation’s maritime flag, known as an ensign. That registry is often know as the Flag State, especially to distinguish it from the Port State – the latter being the country where a yacht is located when not in international waters. Registration is about much more than just choosing a flag to wear on the stern: it’s what gives a yacht nationality and frames owner’s, manager’s and crewmembers’ responsibilities. The choice of registry affects the laws and regulations the owner must adhere to, the ready availability of insurance and finance, whether certain taxes must be paid and the attention port officials may pay the vessel. Registration can also prove ownership and is a requirement for international cruising. Notably, there are registries entry into which proves nothing in terms of title. Examples of these include Delaware and the United Kingdom Part III Small Ships Register. Fees and expenses for registration are relatively small, but choosing the wrong registry can be a very costly error. Making that selection is a complicated process requiring independent, expert advice. A trap for the unwary is the recommendation of a certain flag with which a naval architect, project manager or other adviser happens to be familiar – without due consideration of all the owner’s particular circumstances and wishes. SIX FLAGGING FACTORS While the registries themselves are state agencies, many popular ones are managed on a commercial basis and – to an extent – compete with each other. This is a good thing since levels of service must be raised above that which one might otherwise expect from the government departments of certain countries. However, there can also be an incentive to be overly flexible when it comes to the drafting and enforcement of safety regulations. To an extent, flag choice can come down to a process of elimination. Emotions can be a factor but it’s best to let head rule heart. Here are the six main factors you should consider: Insurance Finance Chartering Taxation Scrutiny Service INSURANCE All yachts should be insured and third party cover is normally mandatory. Underwriters will want to understand the risk they’re agreeing to cover, and key to this will be the flag. An unusual flag will not make insurance impossible to find, but it will reduce the number of underwriters with an appetite to write such business thereby pushing up premiums. FINANCE Some yachts are financed, by means of a lease or loan , as a means to free-up investment capital for owners’ businesses. As with insurers, lenders will be taking a financial and legal interest in the vessel, and will want to make sure that the owner abides by high maintenance and safety standards. Lenders will also need to have confidence in the rule of law in the country of registration itself, since the mortgages will be entered in the registry. CHARTERING For the protection of paying guests, chartering requires adherence to a wide range of international regulations. Fortunately, certain registries have created safety codes to simplify compliance which reduces cost and administration. Certification by a classification society is normally required above a certain size, although this size varies. Some owners may regard classification as expensive and unnecessary (and it may not be possible for some vessels not originally built to class rules) while others choose this route for peace of mind regardless of charter activity. Chartering isn’t possible at all with some flags when the vessel is over a certain size, for example Jersey and Guernsey. The existence of any cabotage rules should also be considered. These are protectionist measures requiring vessels operating commercially to be registered locally if not engaged in international voyages. The best example of this is the United States. If the plan was to charter in US waters there would no other real choice but to fly the Stars and Stripes. TAXATION If not being used commercially, it is possible – where the beneficial owner is not tax resident in or connected with the European Union – to avoid the payment of Value Added Tax and customs in the EU on the yacht itself, for up to 18 months, through Temporary Admission. However, this requires registration outside the EU amongst other conditions. It also requires detailed, specific advice to ensure that the correct information is given and at the right time. VAT can be up to 25% and charged on the hull value. Port officials may detain a vessel pending payment (and any fines and/or interest). SCRUTINY Any yacht can be boarded, at any time, by a port official whose job it is to make sure that all the paperwork is in order – which can be invasive and can cause unexpected delays. As their time and resources are limited, inspections are often prioritised according to flag. The Paris Memorandum of Understanding, for example, is a group of 27 European and North Atlantic nations which inspect safety, security and environmental standards of more than 18,000 vessels each year. Other similar such groups exist worldwide. Information is shared between members, and flags categorised into White, Grey and Black lists. White List categorisation should mean fewer inspections but does not lead to immunity altogether. SERVICE If a registry isn’t helpful and doesn’t make its regulations and guidance easily available, in a language which managers, captains and crew can understand, then as a matter of common sense it can be ruled-out. Local agents and corporate service providers can be used to overcome time zone difficulties, but at a cost and with the risk of misunderstandings and further delays. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Keep it Classy Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Keep it Classy

When yacht insurance underwriters ask questions, you, the owner, must respond to as accurately as possible. But there is also a positive duty on insured to speak up about matters which may affect the risk. It’s important not only to understand the nature and extent of that duty if you’re yacht is to stay covered, but also to ensure that your broker isn’t a weak link in the chain. Home Handbook Insuring / / Providing Information 15 April 2023 Last revised minutes 4 Reading time When underwriters ask questions, you, the owner, must respond as accurately as possible. But there is also a positive duty on you, as insured, to speak up about matters which may affect the risk. It’s important not only to understand the nature and extent of that duty if you’re yacht is to stay covered, but also to ensure that your broker isn’t a weak link in the chain. minutes 4 Reading time 15 April 2023 Last revised When underwriters ask questions, you, the owner, must respond as accurately as possible. But there is also a positive duty on you, as insured, to speak up about matters which may affect the risk. It’s important not only to understand the nature and extent of that duty if you’re yacht is to stay covered, but also to ensure that your broker isn’t a weak link in the chain. Insurance contracts are based on the principle of the utmost good faith, requiring parties to provide honest and complete information. Underwriters may not have detailed knowledge of each specific risk, so insured individuals have a duty to disclose material information. A fair presentation of the risk includes disclosing all material circumstances or providing sufficient information to prompt further inquiries by a prudent insurer. Disclosure should be clear and accessible to the insurer, and statements must be made in good faith. Material circumstances are those that would influence a prudent insurer's judgment in determining whether to accept the risk and on what terms. The insured's knowledge refers to the company's senior management, including captains, departmental heads, and insurance brokers. Claims history, crewing arrangements, and yacht valuations are among the practical matters that need to be disclosed. Yacht valuations can be contentious, and a specific reference to the agreed value should be included in policies. Breaching the duty of fair presentation can lead to remedies for the underwriter if it directly influenced their decision to enter the contract. Consequences for breaching the duty of fair presentation vary based on intent, ranging from no liability with no premium return to reduced claim payment or returned premiums. The insured's knowledge refers to the company's senior management, including captains, departmental heads, and insurance brokers. Claims history, crewing arrangements, and yacht valuations are among the practical matters that need to be disclosed. Yacht valuations can be contentious, and a specific reference to the agreed value should be included in policies. Breaching the duty of fair presentation can lead to remedies for the underwriter if it directly influenced their decision to enter the contract. Consequences for breaching the duty of fair presentation vary based on intent, ranging from no liability with no premium return to reduced claim payment or returned premiums. Insurance contracts are based on the principle of the utmost good faith, requiring parties to provide honest and complete information. Underwriters may not have detailed knowledge of each specific risk, so insured individuals have a duty to disclose material information. A fair presentation of the risk includes disclosing all material circumstances or providing sufficient information to prompt further inquiries by a prudent insurer. Disclosure should be clear and accessible to the insurer, and statements must be made in good faith. Material circumstances are those that would influence a prudent insurer's judgment in determining whether to accept the risk and on what terms. No two insurance risks will ever be identical. Underwriters will know about yachts in general, but they cannot be expected to know the ins and outs of your particular vessel, which will be, to a greater or lesser extent, unique, and crewed, managed and operated in a distinctive way. So while most contracts work on the basis of buyer beware – with parties doing their own homework – insurance works on the opposite basis: there’s a positive duty to provide honest information. They are said to be contracts of ‘utmost good faith’. This is manifested in the insurer, in the case of yachts owned by companies (which cannot, by definition, be considered as consumers) being under a duty to make a ‘fair presentation’ of the risk. This duty obliges the insured to disclose material circumstances that it knows (or ought to know) or put a prudent underwriter on notice that it needs to make further enquiries. FAIR PRESENTATION A fair presentation is one where the insured discloses every ‘material circumstance’ which the insured knows or ought to know, or, failing that, gives sufficient information to put a (hypothetical) ‘prudent insurer’ on notice that it needs to make further enquiries for the purpose of revealing those material circumstances. Disclosure must be made in a manner which would be reasonably clear and accessible to that hypothetical prudent insurer. Facts must ‘substantially correct’ and statements of expectation or belief must be made in good faith. A circumstance will be material if it ‘would influence the judgement of a prudent insurer in determining whether to take the risk and, if so, on what terms’. This includes special or unusual facts relating to the risk, particular concerns which led the insured to look for cover, and anything which those specialising in yachting-related risks would generally understand as being something that should be included in a fair presentation of risk. Note that we are concerned with the judgement of a prudent insurer: the opinions of the actual underwriter concerned are irrelevant. The insured’s knowledge, in the case of an owning company, is taken to mean the company’s ‘senior management’, which will include captains and departmental heads, plus those making decisions about insurance (including insurance brokers or other intermediaries acting on the owner’s behalf – whether regulated or not – such as a yacht broker). A ‘reasonable search’ for relevant information must be made – including with third parties. This might include, for example, making inquires with classification societies. PRACTICAL MATTERS The claims history of both the legal and beneficial owner will almost certainly be material – even if the proposal form simply asks in respect of the ‘insured’s claims record. If you, as beneficial owner, have criminal convictions in respect of dishonesty then this should be disclosed. While it may be obvious whether or not a yacht requires crew, the nature and extent of crewing arrangements will need to be provided in detail. The captain’s CV/résumé may be requested. You should ask a third party services provider to verify the crewmember’s qualifications and stated experience. If a survey is needed, check whether that surveyor must have been approved by the underwriter and/or hold certain qualifications. VALUATIONS Yacht valuations can, and have, been a source of contention over the years. Policies can be unvalued but given the obvious room for disagreement, nearly all on the basis of a valuation agreed at the outset. There should be a specific reference to the value being agreed – not merely to a ‘sum insured’ or similar. Unless fraud can be proved, the fixed value is usually conclusive. Problems arise where owners pay over the odds at the outset, or where renewals haven’t taken account of depreciation, so that the resulting over-valuation risks being deemed to be a material misrepresentation. This will be the conclusion where the owner has no genuine belief that the value given was a true valuation. It would be wise to obtain an independent valuation, but – being subjective – this shouldn’t be treated as conclusive. CONSEQUENCES If the insured breaches the duty of fair presentation, the underwriter is entitled to a remedy only if it can demonstrate that the breach directly influenced its decision to enter into the insurance contract, or at all. To prove this influence, the underwriter must establish that, without the breach, it would not have entered into the contract or, at least, would have done so on different terms, such as a higher premium. If the breach of the duty of fair presentation was made deliberately or recklessly, the underwriter can walk away from liability entirely – not even pausing to return premiums paid. If the breach was neither deliberate nor reckless, and the underwriter would not have provided cover on any terms, then payment of claims can be refused but premiums paid must be returned. If the underwriter would have just charged a higher premium, then the amount payable on a claim may be reduced proportionately. CONSUMERS In the unlikely ( and unwise ) event that own your yacht personally, and it’s not chartered out or otherwise used for business purposes, then your position, as a consumer, is different to that set out above. It’s then up to underwriters to ask the questions and determine the risk. The insured simply has to exercise reasonable care not to make a misrepresentation when answering questions. There’s no obligation to volunteer information. TIPS & TRICKS Be sure that the insurance broker earns its commission and tells you everything you need to disclose. It is quite possible that your broker advises you poorly, and, as a result, you fail in your duty of fair presentation. In which case, the broker will be liable. Consider where the broker is based and how it is regulated. Obtaining the requisite information takes time, so plan ahead – including when it’s time to renew. Do not assume that the underwriter already has sufficient information: disclose all material information, even if it’s obvious. Be sure to respond fully to all questions raised. Avoid data dumping, and make sure that information is indexed, categorised or otherwise easily navigable. Keep an audit trail of the searches carried out and the enquiries made, to prove that you have conducted a reasonable search. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Staying Covered Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Staying Covered

Unavailable at present Latest Position Example Brokerage & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 37 m Length Finest Craft Builder 2011 Build year 156 Gross tonnage Cayman Islands Registry Particulars Type

Home Journeys Eastern Seaboard / / New England Charm At last we reach Boston Harbor and its islands. Boston Harbor is older than most countries. It’s gritty. Polished – lightly – for the tourists, but without losing its edge. There’s the glint of glass skyscrapers, sure, but they’re sitting awkwardly next to 18th-century brick buildings. It’s a city that’s never quite made up its mind about whether it wants to be New York’s cooler cousin or a living history museum. Then there are the islands: little green blips like Spectacle, Thompson, and George’s that offer refuge from the city’s pace, with forts, trails and beaches. It’s authentic, and all the better for it. Waypoint 7 Boston Harbor The penultimate waypoint is Provincetown (or “P-Town,” as it’s known by those who wear feather boas unironically) is a glorious explosion of art, colour, and character perched on the edge of Cape Cod. It’s one of the very few places in the States where the weird, the wild, and the wildly wealthy have all agreed to share a bit of sand and sea without shouting at each other. It’s part art colony, part fishing village, part social experiment—and all of it works in a glorious, slightly chaotic way. Climb the Pilgrim Monument, explore Herring Cove Beach, or go whale watching. Waypoint 6 Provincetown This is where the journey peaks in old-money splendour: an island where cobblestone streets and historic whaling cottages transport you back in time. It’s got taste. And manners. Even the seagulls seem well-behaved. This is not a place where you show off your wealth by revving a Lamborghini. You park your battered car outside a house with perfectly weathered shingles that’s been in the family since the Civil War. Explore the Whaling Museum to delve into the island's rich maritime history, or visit the Sankaty Head Lighthouse for breathtaking coastal views. It’s charming, peaceful, and absurdly picturesque. Waypoint 5 Nantucket Known as Amity in the 1975 film Jaws, it’s less workaday than depicted. Martha’s Vineyard exudes charm and sophistication It’s a place where people ‘summer’ rather than merely spend their vacation. The island is a patchwork of little towns, each with its own flavour. You can cycle the entire island, get lost in farmers’ markets, eat lobster rolls, or browse art galleries. Strolling through Edgartown, all white picket fences and centuries-old captain’s houses, you half expect Chief Brody to burst onto the street shouting about closing the beaches. It does add a certain thrill to paddleboarding. Waypoint 4 Martha’s Vineyard Today we’re dropping by Cuttyhunk Island, a tranquil retreat known for its pristine beaches and abundant marine life. Cuttyhunk is the westernmost of the Elizabeth Islands, a chain of rugged, mostly private lumps of land owned by people who have last names that sound like Ivy League libraries. But public Cuttyhunk is the exception. When you arrive, it feels less like entering a port and more like stumbling into someone’s well-kept secret. There are no cars and no boutiques. In fact, there’s not much to do here except eat fresh local oysters and congratulate yourself on your life choices. Waypoint 3 Cuttyhunk Island Next is Block Island, anchoring at Great Salt Pond. At only about 7 miles long and 3 miles wide, it’s one of the most charming, gloriously old-fashioned specks of land in the United States. The island runs on what one can only describe as “lobster time.” People are either going to eat it, catch it, or talk about how good it was last night. Explore the island's scenic trails by bicycle, visit the iconic Southeast Lighthouse, or relax on the beaches. The town of New Shoreham is basically a handful of weather-beaten buildings which have probably looked exactly the same since Roosevelt was president. There’s something refreshingly unbothered about the place. Waypoint 2 Block Island We’re beginning our journey in Newport - the spiritual home of American yachting. Back in the Gilded Age, the great and the grotesquely wealthy (think Vanderbilts, Astors, people whose surnames sound like investment banks) descended on this seaside town and decided to build summer ‘cottages’ not too far from New York. Cottages, that is, roughly the size of Versailles. The opulent Breakers mansion is worth visiting. Then explore the historic waterfront – packed with sloops and schooners. As evening descends, dine at one of the harbour’s upscale restaurants, savouring seafood delicacies. Waypoint 1 Newport Welcome to old America. The kind of place where the towns weren’t designed around cars but horses, and the harbours have seen everything from pirate ships and whaling vessels to America’s Cup contenders. The coast hugs you like an old friend. It’s glorious, elegant – and exactly how summer should be. By sharing some Members' itineraries, we're helping others unlock their yachts’ full potential, reducing crew turnover and making ownership a more rewarding experience. Country(ies): United States Time zone(s): Winter: EST (UTC-5) Summer: EDT (UTC-4) Currency(ies): United States Dollar (USD) Temperature: February: 4°C (40°F) August: 18°C (64°F) Sunshine: February: 6 hours August: 9 hours Humidity: February: 62% August: 71%

Unavailable at present Latest Position Example Brokerage & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 80 m Length DMS & Co Builder 2006 Build year 1300 Gross tonnage Spain Registry Particulars Example

Without sufficient security in place, having provided a loan to a shell company to buy an expensive, mobile asset, lenders could be left out-of-pocket and finance would be impossible to obtain. While loan security can be found in various documents, the requirements themselves can always be traced back to the loan agreement. Home Handbook Financing / / Loan Security 4 April 2017 Last revised minutes 6 Reading time Without sufficient security in place, having provided a loan to a shell company to buy an expensive, mobile asset, lenders could be left out-of-pocket and finance would be impossible to obtain. While loan security can be found in various documents, the requirements themselves can always be traced back to the loan agreement. minutes 6 Reading time 4 April 2017 Last revised Without sufficient security in place, having provided a loan to a shell company to buy an expensive, mobile asset, lenders could be left out-of-pocket and finance would be impossible to obtain. While loan security can be found in various documents, the requirements themselves can always be traced back to the loan agreement. Unpaid crew, suppliers, and collision victims have liens over yachts, creating competing claims for lenders. Port authorities can detain a yacht for unpaid dues, further complicating the lender's position. Yards can have possessory liens on yachts if the owner hasn't paid for works carried out. Mortgages grant lenders rights against the yacht itself in the event of default, and they are the most important type of security. Mortgage registration is essential, either as a statutory mortgage or a common law mortgage, to establish priority and enforceability. Covenants and assignments supplement the mortgage document and dictate obligations and transfers of rights. Deeds of covenant and collateral security documents cannot be registered but are still important for additional protection. Non-statutory mortgages serve as a backup when statutory mortgages are invalid, but they have limitations in enforcement. Yacht registration is required, and the deed ensures the yacht remains registered throughout the mortgage term. Insurance covenants are crucial, and policies must cover the yacht and third-party liabilities to safeguard the lender's interests. Covenants and assignments supplement the mortgage document and dictate obligations and transfers of rights. Deeds of covenant and collateral security documents cannot be registered but are still important for additional protection. Non-statutory mortgages serve as a backup when statutory mortgages are invalid, but they have limitations in enforcement. Yacht registration is required, and the deed ensures the yacht remains registered throughout the mortgage term. Insurance covenants are crucial, and policies must cover the yacht and third-party liabilities to safeguard the lender's interests. Unpaid crew, suppliers, and collision victims have liens over yachts, creating competing claims for lenders. Port authorities can detain a yacht for unpaid dues, further complicating the lender's position. Yards can have possessory liens on yachts if the owner hasn't paid for works carried out. Mortgages grant lenders rights against the yacht itself in the event of default, and they are the most important type of security. Mortgage registration is essential, either as a statutory mortgage or a common law mortgage, to establish priority and enforceability. At the outset, it’s important to note that, with regards the yacht, the lender can still be left competing with the following who may automatically have claims against a yacht – which is why security has to be so wide-ranging: Unpaid crew and suppliers, collision victims, etc, all have liens over yachts Port authorities can have a statutory right to detain a yacht for unpaid dues Yards can have possessory liens where works have been carried for which the owner hasn’t paid: where the yacht is out of the water, it’s a case of no-cash-no-splash MORTGAGES A mortgage grants a lender (the ‘mortgagee’) rights against the yacht itself (known as rights ‘in rem’), rather than just against the owner (the ‘mortgagor’) in the event of default. While it still needs to be beefed-up by other types of security, such as covenants, and assignments of earnings and insurances, the mortgage is the most important type of security taken by a lender. Mortgages over yachts are known as ship mortgages to distinguish them from real estate mortgages. A mortgage can be taken over the whole yacht or just a number of the 64 available shares. MORTGAGE REGISTRATION The mortgagee’s power to sell the yacht in the event of default is specifically granted by statute. A mortgage is said to be ‘statutory’ where it has been set out and registered as prescribed by statute (in this case, regulation 57 of, Merchant Shipping (Registration of Ships) Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/3138) and paragraph 7 of Schedule 1 to the Merchant Shipping Act 1995. Otherwise, they are known as ‘common law’ mortgages but these are very unusual. A statutory mortgage can only be created over a yacht registered under Part I (but not the Part III ‘Small Ships Register’). The mortgagee will likely use a Form 4736 ‘Account Current’ statutory mortgage to secure not just the principal sum and interest but also costs and expenses. A Notice of Mortgage Intent MSF 4739 can be lodged in advance in order to record as early a date as possible for the mortgage: this is important when establishing the priority of debts in the event of later default. The mortgage is a brief document, just setting out the names of the parties, details of the yacht, and a short description of the secured obligation with reference to the agreement and the deed of covenant that supplements the mortgage. It must be lodged with the Registrar General of Shipping and Seamen, and the relevant fee paid. The Registrar will the register and returned the mortgage document. Where the mortgagor is a company registered in England and Wales, then, by virtue of section 860 of the Companies Act 2006, details of the statutory mortgage, the deed of covenant and any other security documents must be sent to the Registrar of Companies within 21 days, failing which such documents will be void as against a creditor, liquidator or administrator. COVENANTS & ASSIGNMENTS As the mortgage document itself is so brief, and there’s no scope for amending or adding to it, and also as the mortgage attaches to the yacht rather than the owner, it must be supplemented by covenants and assignments. Covenants dictate various dos and don’ts, and may be set out in the loan agreement and/or separately in a deed of covenant according to the lender’s house style. Assignments transfer rights from one party to another. The remainder of this article considers common covenants and assignments. For convenience, it is assumed that all covenants are set out in a deed. Unlike mortgages, deeds of covenant, and any other collateral security documents, cannot be registered with the Registrar of Ships. NON-STATUTORY MORTGAGE While a deed supports the mortgage, deeds can still have a clause by which the yacht is mortgaged. This is needed as a backup in case the statutory mortgage is invalid – which can be the case where, for example, the mortgage hasn’t been registered with the Companies Register. The deed will create a non-statutory mortgage which, while better than nothing, won’t be enforceable against a buyer who buys in good faith and isn’t aware of the mortgage, and will be ranked below a statutory mortgage should the mortgagor default. YACHT REGISTRATION The mortgagor will promise in the deed the yacht will be registered as a ship in the United Kingdom, and will remain, so, under the same registered name, for as long as the yacht is mortgaged. This is necessary as UK Part I ship registrations expire after only five years unless renewed. CHARGE REGISTRATION The deed will require, where the owner is a company registered in England or Wales, the mortgage to be registered as a charge with the United Kingdom companies register (known as Companies House). This is fallback requirement as the mortgagee isn’t going to leave anything to chance and will (or should) have registered the mortgage as soon as possible as not doing so risks the mortgagee loosing both the security and priority. INSURANCE Arguably just as important as the mortgage is the borrower’s covenants in respect of insurance, and policy assignments. In particular, the borrower covenants to: At the borrower’s expense, insure the yacht, for a value, on terms, and with an underwriter(s), all agreed with the lender. Comply with all policy terms throughout the term of the loan, including, of course, prompt payment of insurance premiums. Renew policies as needed to maintain cover. Not settle a claim without the lender’s consent It’s not only the yacht itself which must be insured, but third party liabilities which, if not satisfied, will expose the yacht itself to claims which might rank higher than the lender’s as mortgagee. Particular risks must also be covered, such as war risks, and mortgagee’s interest insurance. The latter provides cover where a failing on the borrower’s part means that other policies are rendered ineffective. For larger yachts, the policies must be assignable to the lender, and confirmation will have to be provided by underwriters that such assignments are noted on the policies and that proceeds of the insurance will be paid to the lender if necessary. For smaller yachts, it may be sufficient for the lender to be named as a co-assured on the policy. CLASSIFICATION SOCIETY An explanation as to the role of classification societies (often known as ‘class’) can be found here . Assuming the yacht must be classed, if the yacht isn’t maintained and surveyed as Class Rules stipulate, the yacht is said to be ‘out of class’ – which can lead to insurance policies being invalidated, as well as the yacht not being maintained properly. As this would jeopardise the mortgagee’s security, the deed of covenant will stipulate maintenance in class. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE Depending on the yacht’s length, gross tonnage and whether it’s registered for chartering, it will be subject to various regulations which help ensure it’s used safely. H ere’s a summary of those affecting your yacht . As well as being detained by port officials, non-compliance can render insurances void, which has obvious implications for the mortgagee’s financial security. Compliance with such regulations will be a key provision. INSPECTION As Class rules and flag state regulations only help to ensure the safe construction, maintenance and operation of the yacht, the mortgagee will want to have the opportunity to inspect the vessel to ensure that aesthetic aspects, and with them much of her value, are also being maintained. The mortgagee must therefore have a right to inspect, and this can be supported by a specific minimum value. MANAGEMENT While ‘yacht management’ can cover a broad spectrum of support services, regulations may require management of a specific type and quality, failing which the vessel may be off-cover for insurance purposes and liable to detention following a port state inspection. Managers also vary in approach and quality. Unsurprisingly, therefore, mortgagees will want to approve which manager is appointed. OPERATIONS The mortgagee may wish to restrict the movement of the yacht, not only by stipulating that she is to be kept out of waters close to areas known for piracy or adjacent to unstable countries, but also away from areas where actions in the event of default may be difficult or impractical. It may also be necessary for the deed to spell out that the yacht is to be used in a legal way – for example, not chartering out where the yacht is not registered as a commercial vessel and insured accordingly. CHARTERING An assignment of chartering income (if any) can be a helpful tool for a lender looking to recoup money, especially while awaiting the sale of a yacht in the event of default. Written notice will need to be served on the charterers – which can be commercially awkward for the borrower and a good incentive to keep on track with loan repayments. INCIDENTS Where any kind of incident occurs involving the yacht, whether that be a fire, grounding, flooding, or a legal action such as arrest or other formal court proceedings, the mortgagee will want to know right away, and the deed of covenant will reflect this. Crucially, liens can rank higher than a mortgage. MODIFICATIONS Refits don’t always improve or even add value to yachts: an owner’s ‘personal stamp’ can adversely affect value and may not even be carried in compliance with regulations. The mortgagee will want to know about, and if necessary veto, any proposed modifications. DISPOSAL While obvious, it needs to be set out in the deed of covenant that the mortgagor cannot sell the yacht while it provides security. COLLATERAL SECURITY As well as the mortgage and deed of covenant, the lender may want a mortgage or charge over the shares in the yacht owning company, involving share certificates being deposited with the lender, together with signed but undated stock transfers. Going one stage further, the lender may also require a personal guarantee from the beneficial owner. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Loan Enforcement Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Loan Enforcement

Most large yachts are bought and sold on the basis of the MYBA MOA. While the mechanics of the sale process is dealt with in that document, there’s one glaring omission: what documents does the seller need to produce to prove ownership and liabilities? As mere paperwork, such matters are often only negotiated once the MOA has been agreed, leaving scope for an otherwise viable deal to falter. Consider what’s likely to be requested at the outset and prepare accordingly. Home Handbook Selling / / Preparing the Paperwork 29 January 2025 Last revised minutes 9 Reading time Most large yachts are bought and sold on the basis of the MYBA MOA . While the mechanics of the sale process is dealt with in that document, there’s one glaring omission: what documents does the seller need to produce to prove ownership and liabilities, and ensure a smooth transaction? As mere paperwork, such matters are often only negotiated once the MOA has been agreed, leaving scope for an otherwise viable deal to falter. Consider what’s likely to be requested at the outset and prepare accordingly. minutes 9 Reading time 29 January 2025 Last revised Most large yachts are bought and sold on the basis of the MYBA MOA . While the mechanics of the sale process is dealt with in that document, there’s one glaring omission: what documents does the seller need to produce to prove ownership and liabilities, and ensure a smooth transaction? As mere paperwork, such matters are often only negotiated once the MOA has been agreed, leaving scope for an otherwise viable deal to falter. Consider what’s likely to be requested at the outset and prepare accordingly. Clause 18 of the MOA requires "Addendum One" documents, but no such addendum is included. Essential documents are needed for re-registration and proving title, without which the vessel could lose value. Missing corporate authorities or powers of attorney could invalidate the sale. Documents may need specific authentication to be accepted by the flag state. Seller’s documents are crucial for proving ownership and regulatory compliance. Legal professionals have standard expectations for required documents, beyond outdated MYBA lists. Proper planning is needed before the MOA is agreed to ensure all documents are available. Sale documents fall into six categories, which are considered in detail below. Seller’s documents are crucial for proving ownership and regulatory compliance. Legal professionals have standard expectations for required documents, beyond outdated MYBA lists. Proper planning is needed before the MOA is agreed to ensure all documents are available. Sale documents fall into six categories, which are considered in detail below. Clause 18 of the MOA requires "Addendum One" documents, but no such addendum is included. Essential documents are needed for re-registration and proving title, without which the vessel could lose value. Missing corporate authorities or powers of attorney could invalidate the sale. Documents may need specific authentication to be accepted by the flag state. Unhelpfully, Clause 18 of the MOA simply sets out that the “Addendum One” documents must be provided by the seller, yet the MOA doesn’t come with Addendum One – or any addenda for that matter. Certain documents will be needed for re-registration and for proving title – without which the vessel may be worth less or even worthless. The sale itself could be invalidated where the correct corporate authorities and powers of attorney aren’t in place. And such documents may need to be authenticated in a particular way(s) in order to be accepted by the vessel’s new or existing flag state. The seller’s documents are so much more than mere paperwork: they help prove ownership, and are evidence that the vessel complies with certain regulations. They’re fundamental, not a formality. Most lawyers involved in yacht sale and purchase will have their own standard document setting out what they expect to see when representing the buyer. At some point, MYBA has produced it own rather meagre list, versions of which are still doing the rounds years later. It’s best to think about what’ll be asked for, and who has possession of these (or can provide them) even before the MOA is agreed. Assuming the vessel is owned through a company, the paperwork can be divided into six broad categories: Seller due diligence, proving that the company exists and has the capacity to own and sell the vessel; Beneficial owner due diligence, confirming identity and providing a personal guarantee; Seller corporate documents, resolving to sell and appointing attorneys; Asset due diligence, demonstrating provenance and conformity with safety regulations; Liability due diligence, showing that those would could have a claim against the vessel do not; and Sale process documents, which will show that the sale took place, when and where. Let’s look at each group in further detail. SELLER DUE DILIGENCE A Certificate of Incorporation , Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association , in respect of the selling company (including any amendments) are needed to verify that the seller is the legally-registered entity it appears to be, which actually has the authority to own and sell the asset. This may sound obvious, but companies can only do what they’re empowered to do. A recent Certificate of Incumbency , or equivalent certificate, is important in verifying the current shareholders and directors of the seller, as well as confirming that the seller is in good standing and no action is being taken against them. A Certificate of Good Standing , or equivalent certificate, is also needed from the seller's registry to certify that they are in good standing with that registry. These documents are necessary fundamental to ensuring that the buyer is not at risk of fraud. BENEFICIAL OWNER DUE DILIGENCE A Personal Guarantee & Indemnity , whether on standard MYBA terms or otherwise, from the yacht’s beneficial owner, goes a long way to providing additional security for the buyer in case the seller is unable to fulfil its obligations under the sale agreement. The seller, after all, is almost certainly an offshore company with no assets to claim against other than the vessel which has just been sold. The guarantee should make provision for private arbitration so that, in the event of a dispute, matters aren’t settled in the public eye. Up-to-date personal identity documents are also useful in making sure that whoever signs the guarantee is who they claim to be. It should be noted that not all beneficial owners are happy to provide these documents. Some take the view that all their assets are owned through companies with which they don’t want to have any involvement. If you don’t want to agree to provide these to the seller, that’s your prerogative. This may or may not be a deal-breaker for the buyer. SELLER CORPORATE DOCUMENTS As with any large transaction undertaken by a company, the seller needs to produce written Resolutions , signed by someone with the requisite authority, confirming ownership, approving the sale, and authorising representatives to act on behalf of the company in respect of the completion of the sale (such attending on board at completion, and signing the sale documents). For the sake of certainty, Powers of Attorney are also needed to give the individuals the powers which the company has resolved to given them. ASSET DUE DILIGENCE It doesn’t provide conclusive proof, but the Certificate of Registry does help to prove ownership. The Builder’s Certificate shows who the builder was (yard pedigree being an important component of value) as well as it’s specification (which is vital when establishing what regulations will apply and establishing whether it can be chartered). Providing all the previous Bills of Sale will establish a chain of ownership transferal, extending back to its launch, which helps to confirm current ownership, as well as being documents which a fraudster would struggle to produce. The yacht will be subject to various regulations and all the relevant safety and convention certificates must be obtained well in advance of the sale so that the buyer knows that the yacht is capable of satisfying these rules. LIABILITY DUE DILIGENCE Debts incurred by an owner, in respect of their yacht, can be enforced against that yacht (as well as that owner) even after it’s been sold to an unsuspecting buyer. So a recent Transcript of Register will show that the vessel is free from any registered liens or encumbrances and is still solely owned by the seller. It’s also important to obtain a Manager’s Letter (if a yacht manager has been engaged) and a Captain’s Letter , confirming that the seller has no liabilities to the manager, or captain, or any third parties, and that the yacht has not been involved in any incidents or accidents since the pre-sale condition survey. Crewmembers’ Letters will confirm that each crewmember has been paid everything owed to them. And where the yacht is being sold as having a tax-paid status, evidence of this must be prepared – allowing sufficient time for the buyer to take advice from a local tax specialist. SALE PROCESS DOCUMENTS A Completion Timetable , which lists all parties involved in the completion of the sale, their contact details, and the necessary steps to be taken during and after completion, is essential to ensure that all parties are aware of the steps required to complete the sale and that they are well-coordinated. The Bill of Sale , signed by the seller, declares that the vessel is free from all debts, claims, liens, and encumbrances and transfers ownership to the buyer. This document is necessary to establish transfer of ownership, and is vital for re-registration in the buyer’s name. As the time and location of the transfer of ownership may have tax implications, a Protocol of Delivery & Acceptance , in an agreed format, must be agreed. As a formal payment request, the seller’s Commercial Invoice is essential for bookkeeping and provides customs authorities with essential information regarding the transaction. Finally, the seller must produce a Letter of Undertaking that the yacht will be deleted from the current ship registry soon after the sale. Deletion isn’t free and involves professional time which the seller will have to pay for. Feel free to contact us for further guidance. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Document Authentication Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Document Authentication

Just because charterer guests have paid a great deal of money for the exclusive use of a superyacht, this does not mean that he (or she) has the right to do with the boat and crew as he pleases. A Member recently sought advice with regard to redress following a charter during which guests behaved in a way which was at best depraved – and at worst illegal. Home Handbook Chartering Out / / Difficult Guests 3 October 2017 Last revised minutes 3 Reading time Just because charterer guests have paid a great deal of money for the exclusive use of a superyacht, this does not mean that he (or she) has the right to do with the boat and crew as he pleases. A Member recently sought advice with regard to redress following a charter during which guests behaved in a way which was at best depraved – and at worst illegal. minutes 3 Reading time 3 October 2017 Last revised Just because charterer guests have paid a great deal of money for the exclusive use of a superyacht, this does not mean that he (or she) has the right to do with the boat and crew as he pleases. A Member recently sought advice with regard to redress following a charter during which guests behaved in a way which was at best depraved – and at worst illegal. In the absence of an agreement stating otherwise, the broker marketing the yacht is considered the owner's agent and must act in the owner's best interests. Once the broker books the charter, the owner is bound by the charter agreement and must provide the yacht to the charterer. The terms of the charter agreement are often based on the MYBA Charter Agreement, which allows the owner to back out only in exceptional circumstances and with financial consequences. The captain is required by law to refuse illegal instructions from the charterer, but there are other unsavory or immoral actions that may not be illegal. The MYBA form explicitly prohibits certain behaviors, such as causing nuisance or disrepute, commercial photo shoots, and harassment of crewmembers. Any breach of the charter agreement may entitle the owner to terminate the contract immediately and claim damages. The captain must raise issues with the charterer before the owner can terminate the contract, according to the MYBA Charter Agreement. Despite the challenges, chartering can help offset the costs of owning large yachts with the right guidance and support. The MYBA form explicitly prohibits certain behaviors, such as causing nuisance or disrepute, commercial photo shoots, and harassment of crewmembers. Any breach of the charter agreement may entitle the owner to terminate the contract immediately and claim damages. The captain must raise issues with the charterer before the owner can terminate the contract, according to the MYBA Charter Agreement. Despite the challenges, chartering can help offset the costs of owning large yachts with the right guidance and support. In the absence of an agreement stating otherwise, the broker marketing the yacht is considered the owner's agent and must act in the owner's best interests. Once the broker books the charter, the owner is bound by the charter agreement and must provide the yacht to the charterer. The terms of the charter agreement are often based on the MYBA Charter Agreement, which allows the owner to back out only in exceptional circumstances and with financial consequences. The captain is required by law to refuse illegal instructions from the charterer, but there are other unsavory or immoral actions that may not be illegal. Had the owner known who the charterer was, he would have never have agreed. The charter broker was aware of the charterer’s reputation but remained silent until just before the start of the charter. In the absence of agreement to the contrary, the broker marketing the yacht on behalf of the owner will often be, in law, the owner’s agent. As such, the broker must perform with the appropriate care and skill, and not allow any conflict between personal interests and those of the principal. By booking a charter with someone known to be unsuitable, it could be said that the broker wasn’t careful and just wanted the commission. THE AGREEMENT Once the broker has booked the charter, however, the owner will have been bound by the charter agreement, and is bound to provide his yacht to the charterer. The terms will have been set out in the charter agreement. The most common terms are those published by the Mediterranean Yacht Brokers Association (‘MYBA’), which have also been adopted by the American Yacht Charter Association. The MYBA Charter Agreement only allows the owner to back out as a result of circumstances beyond his control, on pain of reimbursing the owner plus an extra 50%. EDGY BEHAVIOUR While, subject to the charter agreement, the yacht is the charterer’s to do with as he pleases, the captain is obliged by law to refuse to comply with illegal instructions. However, there are many things a charterer may do which, while unsavoury or immoral, are not illegal. The MYBA form therefore expressly bans, for example, behaviour causing nuisance or disrepute, commercial photo shoots, and harassment of crewmembers. Member’s Experience: “ I have been chartering my yachts for more than 15 years and have maintained an excellent relationship with brokers and charterers. In fact, my yachts are considered some of the most successful yachts on the charter market. What has occurred is certainly an aberration and not to be confused with the excellent work the broker community has done these many years. ” Generally, any breach may allow the owner to treat the charter as having come to an end immediately and claim damages, or just claim damages afterwards, depending on how serious the breach is. But the owner must have suffered some sort of actual loss as a result of the breach: an upset crew may not be enough. RAISING ISSUES The MYBA Charter Agreement specifically requires the captain to raise issues with the charterer first, before the owner has a chance to terminate the contract. A failure to do this could arguably be seen as a waiver of the owner’s rights, and owners may wish to amend such standard form contracts. The Member was at pains to point out that these circumstances are unusual, commenting, “I have been chartering my yachts for more than 15 years and have maintained an excellent relationship with brokers and charterers. In fact, my yachts are considered some of the most successful yachts on the charter market. What has occurred is certainly an aberration and not to be confused with the excellent work the broker community has done these many years.” DON’T BE PUT OFF For all the pitfalls and hurdles, chartering can substantially offset the costs associated with the ownership of large yachts – with the right guidance and support. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about How to Charter Out Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about How to Charter Out

The automatic identification system (AIS) is a tracking system that establishes the positions of ships, and fixed and floating objects, in real time. Used as a navigational aid, it also lets the world see a yacht’s position - which isn’t always what we owners want. There are times when ‘going dark’ is allowed and times when it’s not. Home Handbook Managing / / Going Dark 28 November 2022 Last revised minutes 4 Reading time The automatic identification system (AIS) is a tracking system that establishes the positions of ships, and fixed and floating objects, in real time. Used as a navigational aid, it also lets the world see a yacht’s position - which isn’t always what we owners want. There are times when ‘going dark’ is allowed and times when it’s not. minutes 4 Reading time 28 November 2022 Last revised The automatic identification system (AIS) is a tracking system that establishes the positions of ships, and fixed and floating objects, in real time. Used as a navigational aid, it also lets the world see a yacht’s position - which isn’t always what we owners want. There are times when ‘going dark’ is allowed and times when it’s not. The Automatic Identification System (AIS) enhances safety and security by providing positional information and supplementing radar for traffic situation awareness. AIS is used in search and rescue operations, providing accurate information on the position of survival craft. It automates mandatory ship reporting to port authorities or vessel traffic service stations. Ships over 300 gross tonnage engaged in international voyages are required by SOLAS regulations to be fitted with Class A AIS equipment. Local regulations may be significantly more stringent. Yachts not subject to SOLAS requirements can carry Class B AIS devices. AIS systems consist of a small box with VHF transmitters, receivers, and a central processing unit, connected to various shipborne sensors and navigation systems. It transmits static information, dynamic information updated from ship sensors, and voyage-related information. AIS should not be solely relied upon for collision avoidance and does not replace radar target-tracking. It can be switched off under certain circumstances, but the master should report it to the competent authority and restart it when the source of danger has disappeared. Failure to operate AIS may lead to penalties by port state authorities and insurance underwriters may claim the vessel was unseaworthy in case of a collision without AIS. AIS systems consist of a small box with VHF transmitters, receivers, and a central processing unit, connected to various shipborne sensors and navigation systems. It transmits static information, dynamic information updated from ship sensors, and voyage-related information. AIS should not be solely relied upon for collision avoidance and does not replace radar target-tracking. It can be switched off under certain circumstances, but the master should report it to the competent authority and restart it when the source of danger has disappeared. Failure to operate AIS may lead to penalties by port state authorities and insurance underwriters may claim the vessel was unseaworthy in case of a collision without AIS. The Automatic Identification System (AIS) enhances safety and security by providing positional information and supplementing radar for traffic situation awareness. AIS is used in search and rescue operations, providing accurate information on the position of survival craft. It automates mandatory ship reporting to port authorities or vessel traffic service stations. Ships over 300 gross tonnage engaged in international voyages are required by SOLAS regulations to be fitted with Class A AIS equipment. Local regulations may be significantly more stringent. Yachts not subject to SOLAS requirements can carry Class B AIS devices. AIS enhances safety and security in various ways. By plotting positional information provided by nearby vessels, it supplements the picture produced by radar, so enhancing traffic situation awareness. Many of the problems common to radar, such as clutter, target swap as ships pass close by and target loss following a fast manoeuvre, do not affect AIS. AIS is also used in search and rescue operations. Search And Rescue operators, on land, at sea and in the air, get more accurate information, especially on the position of survival craft. Further, because AIS is used to exchange data ship-to-ship and with shore-based facilities, it is useful in automating mandatory ship reporting to port authorities or vessel traffic service (VTS) stations. LEGAL REQUIREMENT By virtue of Regulation 19 of Chapter V of the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) 1974, as amended, all ships of 300 gross tonnage or more and engaged on international voyages must be fitted with Class A AIS equipment. In law, all yachts are ships – and it is irrelevant whether registered as a private or commercial vessel. Class B devices may be carried on yachts which are not subject to the SOLAS requirements. Certain national laws take this further. For example, US Federal law requires commercial vessels of just 65 feet and over to be fitted with a Class A AIS device. HOW IT WORKS The system is contained within a small box, containing one very high frequency (VHF) radio transmitter, various VHF receivers and a central processing unit. To this is attached antennae, and interfaces for heading, speed devices and other shipborne sensors, plus interfaces to radar, Automatic Radar Plotting Aids (ARPA), Electronic Chart System/Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECS/ECDIS) and Integrated Navigation Systems (INS). There’s also a display and keyboard to input and retrieve data. The AIS can be connected either to an additional dedicated AIS display unit, possibly one with a large graphic display, or as an input to existing navigational system devices such as a radar display, ECS, ECDIS, or INS. INFORMATION SHARED The AIS information is transmitted continuously by a ship, and includes the following three types: Static information, which is entered into the AIS on installation and need only be changed if the ship changes its name, Maritime Mobile Service Identity (MMSI), location of the electronic position fixing system (EPFS) antenna, or undergoes a major conversion from one ship type to another; Dynamic information, which, apart from navigational status information, is automatically updated from the ship sensors connected to AIS; and Voyage-related information, some of which such as destination and estimated time of arrival (ETA) will need to be entered manually at the start of the voyage and kept up to date as necessary. INCOMPLETE PICTURE AIS doesn’t always give the complete picture, and – as with any navigational aid – should only be used by itself – especially for collision-avoidance. It doesn’t take the place of radar target-tracking. The officer of the watch (OOW) should always be aware that other ships, in particular smaller leisure craft, fishing boats and warships might not be fitted with AIS. The OOW should always be aware that AIS fitted on other ships as a mandatory carriage requirement might, under certain circumstances, be switched off on the master's professional judgement. SWITCHING OFF Details of yachts whose AIS is switched on maybe accessed by anyone, anywhere, simply by looking at MarineTraffic , VesselFinder or any of the other myriad of similar websites. Not all owners will be happy about this. According to the International Maritime Organisation’s Resolution A.1106(29) of 14 December 2015, entitled Revised Guidelines for The Onboard Operational Use of Shipborne Automatic Identification Systems (AIS): AIS should always be in operation when ships are underway or at anchor. If the master believes that the continual operation of AIS might compromise the safety or security of his/her ship or where security incidents are imminent, the AIS may be switched off. Unless it would further compromise the safety or security, if the ship is operating in a mandatory ship reporting system, the master should report this action and the reason for doing so to the competent authority. Actions of this nature should always be recorded in the ship's logbook together with the reason for doing so. The master should however restart the AIS as soon as the source of danger has disappeared. If the AIS is shut down, static data and voyage-related information remains stored. Restart is done by switching on the power to the AIS unit. Ship's own data will be transmitted after a two-minute initialization period. In ports AIS operation should be in accordance with port requirements. CONSEQUENCES Port state authorities will expect AIS to be operational, and may impose penalties for this not being the case – especially where there is a collision which AIS may have helped to avoid. Keep in mind, too, that non-compliance with more stringent local regulations will be punished . Even in international waters, where a yacht goes dark other than allowed by Resolution A.1106(29), while this may not be noticed by the flag state authority, if there’s a collision then insurance underwriters could claim that, without this important navigational aid working, the vessel was, in law, unseaworthy, and they are entitled to refuse payment. But going dark may not be intentional. Interference, weak radio signals and patchy satellite reception can all compromise AIS data exchange. Distinguishing intentional from unintentional signal drop-outs is difficult but not impossible. The frequency and regularity of drop-outs prior to a full blackout may be indicative. And the reason may not be malevolent. It is known, for example, that in certain parts of the world fishing vessels switch off AIS in order not to reveal productive catch areas to competitors. CONCLUSION Whether we, as owners, like it or not, AIS is governed by international convention – and it’s here to stay. If there are legitimate concerns then going dark may be permissible, but it’s as well to discuss this with the captain and insurance underwriter well in advance of a transit through waters in which it may be prudent or desirable. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about State Yachts Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about State Yachts

Some liabilities, such as those arising from collisions or the injury of a guest or crew member, are obvious. Other liabilities are less obvious: a large wash made by excessive speed can damage both fixed and floating objects some distance away. Occasionally, it may be possible to limit liability just by spelling this out in a well-drafted charter agreement or employment contract. Often, however, there will be no such contractual relationship with an aggrieved party. Home Handbook Managing / / Limiting Liability 26 February 2011 Last revised minutes 5 Reading time Some liabilities, such as those arising from collisions or the injury of a guest or crew member, are obvious. Other liabilities are less obvious: a large wash made by excessive speed can damage both fixed and floating objects some distance away. Occasionally, it may be possible to limit liability just by spelling this out in a well-drafted charter agreement or employment contract. Often, however, there will be no such contractual relationship with an aggrieved party. minutes 5 Reading time 26 February 2011 Last revised Some liabilities, such as those arising from collisions or the injury of a guest or crew member, are obvious. Other liabilities are less obvious: a large wash made by excessive speed can damage both fixed and floating objects some distance away. Occasionally, it may be possible to limit liability just by spelling this out in a well-drafted charter agreement or employment contract. Often, however, there will be no such contractual relationship with an aggrieved party. Yacht owners who are considered the legal owners, rather than just beneficial owners, can be held personally liable for incidents involving their yacht, putting their other assets at risk. Effective insurance, known as Protection & Indemnity (P&I) insurance, is crucial to protect owners against liabilities to third parties. International conventions allow owners to limit their liability, which provides a maximum payout for insurers and encourages trade. The limitation figure for liability does not differentiate between trading ships and yachts, even though yachts are often worth more. International conventions have specific requirements and standards of behavior that must be met to qualify for limitation. The limitation amount is determined based on the tonnage of the yacht in most countries, except for Italy, the United States, and parts of South America. The 1957 and 1976 Limitation Conventions have subtle differences, such as the circumstances under which the right to limit can be lost. Besides the owner, charterers, managers, captains, crew, employees, salvors, and insurers may also have the right to limit liability under the conventions. Owners can set up a fund with a court or competent authority, depositing an amount up to the limitation, to prevent the yacht from being detained in the future and protect other assets. Jurisdictional issues can arise, and different jurisdictions may apply different conventions and rules, making it crucial to seek legal advice promptly and establish jurisdiction in a favorable location with a lower limitation figure. The limitation amount is determined based on the tonnage of the yacht in most countries, except for Italy, the United States, and parts of South America. The 1957 and 1976 Limitation Conventions have subtle differences, such as the circumstances under which the right to limit can be lost. Besides the owner, charterers, managers, captains, crew, employees, salvors, and insurers may also have the right to limit liability under the conventions. Owners can set up a fund with a court or competent authority, depositing an amount up to the limitation, to prevent the yacht from being detained in the future and protect other assets. Jurisdictional issues can arise, and different jurisdictions may apply different conventions and rules, making it crucial to seek legal advice promptly and establish jurisdiction in a favorable location with a lower limitation figure. Yacht owners who are considered the legal owners, rather than just beneficial owners, can be held personally liable for incidents involving their yacht, putting their other assets at risk. Effective insurance, known as Protection & Indemnity (P&I) insurance, is crucial to protect owners against liabilities to third parties. International conventions allow owners to limit their liability, which provides a maximum payout for insurers and encourages trade. The limitation figure for liability does not differentiate between trading ships and yachts, even though yachts are often worth more. International conventions have specific requirements and standards of behavior that must be met to qualify for limitation. Even though yachts tend to be the only asset of an offshore owning company, it is possible, after a serious incident, for the individual ‘beneficial’ owner to be seen as the legal owner. This means that all the beneficial owner’s other assets are at risk. The need for effective insurance against liabilities to third parties, often known as Protection & Indemnity (‘P&I’) insurance, is therefore all the more important. Fortunately, throughout much of the world, the law gives owners the opportunity to restrict their liability. This is for two reasons. Firstly, insurers are more comfortable giving cover if they know what their maximum pay-out could be. Secondly, it is normally government policy to encourage trade. The owners of trading ships are more likely to put to sea if they know what their maximum liability could be. As an English judge recently put it, a ship owner might be prepared to lose his shirt, but not his entire wardrobe. As far as limitation is concerned, the law does not distinguish between trading ships and yachts, and, even though yachts are usually worth much more than similar-sized trading ships, the limitation figure will still be the same. CONVENTIONS But with the appropriate insurance in place, why should the owner need to even think about limitation? The answer is that the international conventions providing the limitation require certain standards of behaviour to be met before granting this invaluable right. That way, it is hoped, the sea is made a safer place for everyone. To understand how the opportunity to limit can slip through the owner’s fingers, it is necessary to look a little more closely at the international rules. It used to be that an owner could give up his ship to a claimant and walk away. As the ship would have been the beneficial owner’s largest asset, this was as much as a claimant could sensibly hope for anyway. This principal survives in Italy, the United States and parts of South America, but in most other countries the tonnage of the yacht will determine the owner’s limit in purely financial terms. A few nations still have no limitation regime whatsoever. EXAMPLE For example, a 35-metre yacht, with a gross tonnage of 120, negligently rams a cargo ship at night. Neither sinks, although the ship requires repairs costing £500,000. A further £500,000 of cargo is damaged, and the time spent carrying out repairs costs the owner another £500,000 in lost business. The yacht owner’s total liability in the UK would be just £650,000 approximately, not £1,500,000. The exact figure is determined using a basket of major currencies, and therefore changes daily. Most countries are party to either the 1957 or 1976 Limitation Conventions. There are subtle but vital differences between the two. The 1957 Convention contains a lower limitation figure, but no limitation is allowed where an incident was the owner’s fault or was the result of something the owner knew about. The 1976 Convention sets a higher figure, but the right to limit will only be lost where the owner did (or failed to do) something with the actual intention of causing loss, or not caring whether or not loss will be caused. Whether or not ‘owner’ here refers to the beneficial owner who chooses to skipper his own yacht, will depend on how transparent the owning company will be to the courts concerned. CHARTERER & MANAGER Aside from the owner, the 1957 Convention allows a charterer or manager, and the captain, crew and any other employees, to limit liability. The 1976 Convention adds salvors and insurers to that list. Broadly, both Conventions limit claims for loss of life or personal injury to any person carried on board, loss of or damage to property, liabilities for dealing with a wrecked or abandoned yacht, and the infringement of any non-contractual rights. The Convention limits do not apply to payments to salvors, or claims by the captain, crew or any of the owner’s employees where the law, or the employment contact itself, does not limit liability. Each Convention has lower limits for property claims than for injury or loss of life. FUND Under the Conventions, where the owner could benefit from limitation, a fund can be set up with a court, or other competent authority. The owner can then make a deposit or present a guarantee of no more than the limitation amount. The setting up of the fund is not a prerequisite to limitation, but will help prevent the yacht being detained in future over the same incident, which would require the security to be provided anyway prior to release, seriously disrupting any charter. The owner’s other assets are also placed out of the reach. This is particularly important where a court considers the owner to mean the beneficial owner. Where the yacht has been detained as security for a claim before a fund is established, it will have to be released. JURISDICTION Of course, any Convention will only be as effective as the law implementing it allows. Details, even the limits themselves and those entitled to them, can vary, as countries embroider the Conventions with their own unique thinking. A claim may be subject to a number of possible jurisdictions, each applying different Conventions in different ways. What’s more, each jurisdiction applies it’s own rules in deciding whether or not their courts can hear a claim, and if so whether their own law should apply. Jurisdiction can be founded by an owner, by bringing a pre-emptive action, in a jurisdiction with a favourably low limitation. Otherwise, there is a risk that an aggrieved party may arrest the yacht in a less favourable jurisdiction, presenting a vague case at that stage, leading to the case being later tried in those courts. Jurisdictional arguments are highly complex and an adventure playground for unscrupulous lawyers looking to rack up large bills! Lawyers have also been known to contrive to keep the business in their own courts, even where this is not in the owner’s best interest. INSURANCE Insurance policies normally state that where the assured would have been entitled to limit liability, but failed, unreasonably, to take the necessary steps to do so, the insurers’ liability will not exceed what would have been the limitation figure. This implies that there is an obligation to ensure, if possible, that the claim is subject to a jurisdiction with a relatively low limitation figure. What’s more, the burden of proving that any failure to limit is not unreasonable often rests with the assured. The assured is also normally under a separate obligation to obtain the necessary legal advice and assistance, as and when required. ADVICE The important point is for owners (or their managers) to seek advice promptly in the event of an incident, in order for the jurisdiction to be established where the limitation is lowest. At the outset, a trusted lawyer in a reputable jurisdiction must be instructed, with the guidance and consent of the insurer, in order to work out a strategy for minimising liability. Other local lawyers in the most favourable jurisdiction can then be appointed. The insurers will have a network of reliable lawyers covering most maritime jurisdictions. Liaising with insurers, from the moment an incident occurs, will bring the insurers’ considerable expertise to bear and prevent the insurer from later claiming that the assured failed to do everything possible to limit liability. As well as being a source of unrivalled pleasure and prestige, yacht ownership also carries with it certain responsibilities. As long as owners appreciate the importance of taking timely advice, from a reputable source, and of liaising closely with their insurers, they can rest assured that they have done everything possible to limit any liability. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Piracy & Protection Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Piracy & Protection

While adherence to classification society Rules is often mandatory, don’t think of these organisations as being there to impose health and safety restrictions and add to an already considerable mound of paperwork. They have their limitations, but they are useful sources of technical knowhow, and their experts can add real value to your build. Home Handbook Building / / Keep it Classy 10 May 2023 Last revised minutes 3 Reading time While adherence to classification society Rules is often mandatory, don’t think of these organisations as being there to impose health and safety restrictions and add to an already considerable mound of paperwork. They have their limitations, but they are useful sources of technical knowhow, and their experts can add real value to your build. minutes 3 Reading time 10 May 2023 Last revised While adherence to classification society Rules is often mandatory, don’t think of these organisations as being there to impose health and safety restrictions and add to an already considerable mound of paperwork. They have their limitations, but they are useful sources of technical knowhow, and their experts can add real value to your build. Classification societies establish and apply standards (Rules) for design, construction, and maintenance of yachts, focusing on technical aspects. Building and keeping a yacht in Class can boost resale value and ensure compliance with Flag State requirements and insurance policies. Classification societies can provide additional consultancy services during builds and refits, assisting with design development. The connection between classification and insurance dates back to the 17th century, with societies like Lloyd's Register providing vessel information to underwriters. The leading classification societies are members of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS), which aids in developing regulations. Societies have limitations, including their focus on physical aspects and potential reliance on sampling instead of full examinations due to their experience with larger ships. Claims against societies for mistakes during the build or regular surveys can be challenging due to the choice of law, historical links to specific countries, and liability exclusions in the agreement. When choosing a society, consider membership in IACS, acceptance by insurance underwriters, openness to new ideas, and a deep understanding of large yachts. Establish a good working relationship with the society's surveyor, considering them as an integral part of the build team. Classification does not guarantee build quality or vessel maintenance; it primarily focuses on technical compliance. Societies have limitations, including their focus on physical aspects and potential reliance on sampling instead of full examinations due to their experience with larger ships. Claims against societies for mistakes during the build or regular surveys can be challenging due to the choice of law, historical links to specific countries, and liability exclusions in the agreement. When choosing a society, consider membership in IACS, acceptance by insurance underwriters, openness to new ideas, and a deep understanding of large yachts. Establish a good working relationship with the society's surveyor, considering them as an integral part of the build team. Classification does not guarantee build quality or vessel maintenance; it primarily focuses on technical compliance. Classification societies establish and apply standards (Rules) for design, construction, and maintenance of yachts, focusing on technical aspects. Building and keeping a yacht in Class can boost resale value and ensure compliance with Flag State requirements and insurance policies. Classification societies can provide additional consultancy services during builds and refits, assisting with design development. The connection between classification and insurance dates back to the 17th century, with societies like Lloyd's Register providing vessel information to underwriters. The leading classification societies are members of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS), which aids in developing regulations. Classification societies (sometimes known just as ‘Class’) are privately-organised groups of engineers and surveyors. They are experts in the technical aspects of yacht construction and maintenance. Their principal role is to research, establish and apply standards (known as ‘Rules’) for design, building and maintenance. The Rules are highly detailed, covering the integrity of the hull, machinery and key safety systems. Depending on your yacht’s size, and whether it’s going to be chartered-out, your chosen Flag State, may require the vessel to be built according to Rules, and, on launching, be kept ‘in Class’. Societies also offer additional consultancy services, going beyond basic classification, during builds and refits. Building to Rules and keeping your yacht in Class can boost the resale value whether or not it is chartered. Where must, as a matter of law, be kept in class, then failing to do so may invalidate insurance policies. Even before the build agreement is signed, the society can review the proposed plans, and in particular any novel features or materials. As well as assessing Rule compliance, they can assist with design development – in a relatively cost-effective way, too. CLASS & INSURANCE The connection between classification and insurance goes back a long way. The oldest society, Lloyd's Register , was named after a 17th-century London coffee house that was frequented by merchants, ship owners and insurance underwriters. Keen to encourage patrons to stay longer, coffee house owner, Edward Lloyd, printed and circulated industry news. The customers set up the Society for the Registry of Shipping in 1760, with the aim of recording information about vessel quality, thereby enabling the underwriters to make more informed decisions about risk. The records were listed, rated and classed in the Society’s Register Book. Subscriptions generated by the Register Book paid for surveyors to examine the vessels. Today, the leading 11 societies are all members of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) - a non-governmental organization covering over 90% of the world’s shipping tonnage. IACS is a non-governmental organization, which helps the International Maritime Organization to develop regulations. LIMITATIONS Societies have two principal limitations. Firstly, they only consider the physical aspects of the yacht and its equipment, not how they are used. Secondly, because they are more used to examining ships ten times the volume of even the largest yachts, there can be a reliance on sampling rather than full examinations: things can be missed. Classification doesn’t automatically assure build quality or vessel maintenance. LIABILITY Society surveyors are human and make mistakes. An owner might want to claim against a society where there has been a mistake made during the build process. More common are omissions made during the regular surveys, especially where the maintenance of the yacht ‘in Class’ is a reason underpinning a purchase. The latter may be an important route to getting compensation, given that the societies are large organisations with deep pockets, whereas the seller is often just an owning company with no other assets once the vessel is sold. What makes claims against societies difficult is that while commercial parties often automatically choose English law, the societies all have historical links to particular countries, and often insist on the law of their ‘home’ country. Further, there are still no international conventions on this subject, despite some initiatives. The choice of law is normally agreed in the contract, of course, but this may not automatically be respected by certain courts, and such a choice may be meaningless to third party buyer who was not party to original contract for classification services. Societies will, where possible, expressly exclude their own liability in the terms of the agreement with the owner. These attempts have largely been upheld. Amazingly, terms will commonly state, for example, that the society ‘does not warrant the accuracy of any information or advice supplied…’ and ‘…will not be liable for any … act, omission, error, negligence, or … any inaccuracy in any information or advice given’. Indeed, the society may also state if there has been negligence on their part, then they will compensate the owner, but only up to the amount of the society’s fees paid – which will usually be a fraction of the damages sought. CHOICE OF SOCIETY You should choose a society which: Is a member of IACS, Is acceptable to the proposed insurance underwriter, Is receptive to new ideas and solutions, and Really understands large yachts. The last point is particularly important where your build includes novel designs or materials. Much can be at the discretion of the society’s surveyor, so a good working relationship is vital. Think of the surveyor as an integral part of your build team. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Engage a Builder Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Engage a Builder

Buying yacht insurance is an annual chore which you, as owner, no doubt leave to your manager or captain. Some larger managers have in-house insurance specialists, but it’s fair to say that it’s often an area that is little understood. Here, we look at the various parties involved and their respective roles. Home Handbook Insuring / / Who's Who 3 January 2023 Last revised minutes 5 Reading time Buying insurance is an annual chore which you, as owner, no doubt leave to your yacht manager or captain. Some larger managers have in-house insurance specialists, but it’s fair to say that it’s often an area that is little understood. Here, we look at the various parties involved and their respective roles. minutes 5 Reading time 3 January 2023 Last revised Buying insurance is an annual chore which you, as owner, no doubt leave to your yacht manager or captain. Some larger managers have in-house insurance specialists, but it’s fair to say that it’s often an area that is little understood. Here, we look at the various parties involved and their respective roles. Large yacht insurance is provided by underwriters: other parties are merely part of the distribution channel. Insurance brokers should act on behalf of the insured - not underwriters - but are paid commission by underwriters. Some intermediaries may mislead clients into believing they are brokers when they are actually agents of underwriters. Other intermediaries may act as brokers during policy inception but switch to being underwriters' claims handlers during claims, leaving owners without the guidance they had expected to receive. Repackaging existing P&I cover to appear as an add-on can mislead clients and inflate costs. Underwriters prioritize profitability and may challenge large claims, causing significant delays and losses to the insured. It is crucial to verify the location and regulation of underwriters to avoid being left without coverage if they become insolvent. Insurance brokers are tightly regulated to prevent conflicts of interest, ensuring they act in the client's best interests. Brokers have a duty to exercise reasonable skill and care, identify the needed insurance, disclose material facts, and obtain suitable cover underwritten by a reputable underwriter. Acting as an unregulated insurance intermediary in the UK is a serious criminal offence; you should check that they're registered with the FCA . Underwriters prioritize profitability and may challenge large claims, causing significant delays and losses to the insured. It is crucial to verify the location and regulation of underwriters to avoid being left without coverage if they become insolvent. Insurance brokers are tightly regulated to prevent conflicts of interest, ensuring they act in the client's best interests. Brokers have a duty to exercise reasonable skill and care, identify the needed insurance, disclose material facts, and obtain suitable cover underwritten by a reputable underwriter. Acting as an unregulated insurance intermediary in the UK is a serious criminal offence; you should check that they're registered with the FCA . Large yacht insurance is provided by underwriters: other parties are merely part of the distribution channel. Insurance brokers should act on behalf of the insured - not underwriters - but are paid commission by underwriters. Some intermediaries may mislead clients into believing they are brokers when they are actually agents of underwriters. Other intermediaries may act as brokers during policy inception but switch to being underwriters' claims handlers during claims, leaving owners without the guidance they had expected to receive. Repackaging existing P&I cover to appear as an add-on can mislead clients and inflate costs. Look for large yacht insurance, and you’ll find all kinds of parties offering it. In fact, it’s only underwriters who provide cover. Everyone else is part of the distribution channel. The term ‘underwriter’ stems from the days when well-heeled individuals, happy to leverage their wealth as collateral, would sign underneath a description of the risk being insured. With some exceptions, you can’t buy cover from underwriters. They use agents to reach the market. Insurance brokers, by contrast, provide a service to those looking for insurance. Brokers act (or should be – they don’t always) in the insured’s interests, even though they are paid commission from underwriters. MARKET PRACTICES One particularly obnoxious practice is to infer that cover is being bought from a broker, whereas, in fact, that party – standing behind a well-marketed brand – is an underwriter’s agent. Another business model to be wary of is that the turncoat, where the intermediary acts as broker at the time of policy inception, but then acts as the underwriter’s claims handler when there’s a claim. The (legal) basis for this is often buried in the small print, but it’s of little help for the owner who, when needing to claim, is left without the guidance which might have been expected. Another unhelpful practice is to divide up and repackage cover so as to appear to add value. For example, third party liability insurance typically covers injury claims from guests – but this doesn’t prevent some from selling guest welfare insurance separately as an add-on. Relative to Hull & Machinery, P&I cover is relatively inexpensive and normally already provides owners with mandatory international cover. And – make no mistake – underwriters are there to turn a profit. They can, and will, challenge large claims, to a final and unappealable conclusion if necessary, in a legal process that can take years, with the insured incurring unrecoverable losses no matter the outcome. One trick is to pay smaller claims quickly and make a song-and-dance of doing so in their marketing materials, public relations and social media, giving the impression that all claims are handled in this way. THE UNDERWRITER Check carefully where the underwriter is based, and who’s regulating them. Should an underwriter become insolvent following a large claim, the owner would almost certainly be left high and dry. For this reason, underwriters based in the United Kingdom and European Union must maintain ‘solvency margins’, to ensure that their assets will cover their potential liabilities. Reinsurance provides further protection. Further afield, however, policyholders should consider just how much of a hit their underwriter could take. Given the expense of holding reserves, and with reinsurance typically accounting for a fair percentage of the premium, some underwriters could be tempted to cut corners. THE BROKER Given that they are paid on a commission basis, inherent potential conflicts of interest are tightly regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). In particular, brokers must act honestly, fairly and in their clients' best interests – and communicate clearly, especially regarding fees and commission. Advice provided must be appropriate for the client and only suitable insurance, and level of cover, must be proposed. GENERAL DUTIES As well as regulatory duties, the law more generally requires brokers to exercise reasonable skill and care (with reference to what one would ordinarily expect from a member of that profession operating within the same market) – plus, there may be a specific contractual duty to source insurance of particular type or standard. OBTAINING COVER Brokers who hold themselves out as dealing or specialising in yacht insurance will owe the insured a duty of care to identify what insurance is needed. While not lawyers, they are expected to have a working knowledge of insurance law, be able to ask their client the right questions, and understand how any exclusion clauses may affect cover. They are under a duty of care to warn the insured of the duty to make a fair presentation to the underwriter, and the separate requirement to disclose material facts. Brokers should also indicate what sort of matters could be considered to be material and ask questions about facts that they know are material but the insured might not think to mention. They must also, when it comes to renewal, go through the same procedure that was carried out at the inception of the policy: they cannot just renew the policy and pick up their commission. While brokers must do everything reasonably possible in order to obtain or renew cover, there is no absolute obligation to do so. Brokers must act with reasonable speed, and obtain multiple quotes, if possible, to make certain that the insured pays no more than necessary. The cover which is obtained must be clear, suitable and meet the insured’s requirements – and has been underwritten by a suitable underwriter(s). ADVISING ON TERMS Crucially for owners of large, permanently-crewed yachts, which are subject to a myriad of regulations, brokers must draw their clients’ attention to any onerous or unusual terms or conditions, so that owners have the opportunity to ensure that they are able to comply with such requirements or, if possible, obtain alternative cover. CLAIMS HANDLING Generally, unless agreed otherwise, brokers must assist clients with making claims. As ever, the broker must act with due skill, care and diligence. Notably (these are issues commonly leading to disputes) the broker must ensure that time limits and notification requirements are complied with. Time limits can be very tight. Policies can also require, for example, a sworn proof of loss to be provided. A whole strategy must be in place for handling claims. OTHER INTERMEDIARIES Do not assume that non-specialist intermediaries such as yacht managers will add value. Some may simply extend chains of communication, increasing the risk of non-payment for non-disclosure of a material fact, while paying the manager’s commission will only increase premiums. Acting as an unregulated intermediary in the UK is a serious criminal offence, carrying a maximum two-year prison term and an unlimited fine for the individuals involved. You can quickly check whether anyone doing so is regulated by looking them up on the FCA's Financial Services Register . BE WARNED Always look beyond the slick websites, social media advertising and event sponsorships, and be clear about the role played about the party(ies) you’re dealing with. Seek written confirmation if you’re in any doubt. Also pay attention to where they’re located, who’s regulating them, and the law and jurisdiction applicable to the policy. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Types of Insurance Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Types of Insurance

Unavailable at present Latest Position Example Brokerage & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 38 m Length Finest Craft Builder 2019 Build year 362 Gross tonnage Cayman Islands Registry Particulars Ideal

Unavailable at present Latest Position Wright A Way & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 22 m Length Italia srl Builder 1994 Build year 45 Gross tonnage Jersey Registry Particulars Sunray

Unavailable at present Latest Position Yachts & More Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 62 m Length Thompson Yachts Builder 2005 Build year 670 Gross tonnage Malta Registry Particulars Guide

Unavailable at present Latest Position Yachts & More Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 28 m Length Finest Craft Builder 2006 Build year 150 Gross tonnage Marshall Islands Registry Particulars Prototype

Unavailable at present Latest Position Example Brokerage & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 48 m Length DMS & Co Builder 2003 Build year 420 Gross tonnage British Virgin Islands Registry Particulars Future

Superyacht owners have a collective worth greater than the annual GDP of Sweden. They are influencers in the truest sense. And now you can reach out to them and their gatekeepers through a platform which is independent and respected. Home About Advertise / / A Wealth of Opportunity The global fleet over 30 metres in length consisted of 5,396 superyachts in operation at the start of 2022 ... The total average final asking price for all used yachts sold, went up in 2021 to €11.8 million. The State of Yachting 2022 REACH THE GLOBAL ELITE Get In Touch Our Members are, by definition, some of the wealthiest people in the world. Working on the widely-accepted Ten Percent Rule, large yacht owners are together worth €637bn.* Which is slightly more than the annual GDP of, say, Sweden.* They are influencers in the truest sense. And now you can reach out to them and their gatekeepers through a platform which is independent and respected. *Sources: SuperYacht Times, The State of Yachting 2022, €(11.8m average value x 10 x 5,396 units), International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook Database, April 2024 No Conflicts of Interest Contact Us Transparency and impartiality being central to the Club’s ethos and success, we will welcome advertising and sponsorship in this, our new website. We are not, however, a yachting media outlet and do not rely on advertising revenue. There are plenty of such platforms, and they do a great job. But we’re exclusively on the side of owners. In order to avoid any conflicts of interest, we cannot carry advertising in respect of yachts, or yachting products or services. If you’d like to explore promoting your non-marine business, please get in touch.

Unavailable at present Latest Position Example Brokerage & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 96 m Length Builder & Co Builder 2021 Build year 1400 Gross tonnage Italy Registry Particulars Pattern

Unavailable at present Latest Position Rapid Brokers Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 58 m Length Thompson Yachts Builder 2020 Build year 642 Gross tonnage United Kingdom Registry Particulars Specimen

Unavailable at present Latest Position New Horizons Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 62 m Length Builder & Co Builder 2009 Build year 700 Gross tonnage Cayman Islands Registry Particulars Result

Unavailable at present Latest Position Wright A Way & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 54 m Length Builder & Co Builder 2010 Build year 790 Gross tonnage Cyprus Registry Particulars Illustration

Unavailable at present Latest Position Example Brokerage & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 72 m Length Thompson Yachts Builder 1996 Build year 1020 Gross tonnage Cayman Islands Registry Particulars Instance

Unavailable at present Latest Position Yachts & More Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 47 m Length DMS & Co Builder 2016 Build year 452 Gross tonnage Marshall Islands Registry Particulars Lesson

Unavailable at present Latest Position Superyachts'R'Us Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 26 m Length Builder & Co Builder 2012 Build year 80 Gross tonnage Marshall Islands Registry Particulars Yardstick

Unavailable at present Latest Position Wright A Way & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 36 m Length Builder & Co Builder 1997 Build year 360 Gross tonnage France Registry Particulars Marker

Unavailable at present Latest Position Rapid Brokers Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 27 m Length Finest Craft Builder 1999 Build year 240 Gross tonnage United Kingdom Registry Particulars Forerunner

Unavailable at present Latest Position Example Brokerage & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 52 m Length Finest Craft Builder 2018 Build year 470 Gross tonnage Marshall Islands Registry Particulars Emblem

Unavailable at present Latest Position Example Brokerage & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 29 m Length Placeholder Yards Builder 2001 Build year 160 Gross tonnage Cayman Islands Registry Particulars Symbol

Unavailable at present Latest Position Example Brokerage & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 39 m Length Builder & Co Builder 1921 Build year 210 Gross tonnage British Virgin Islands Registry Particulars Template

Unavailable at present Latest Position Yachts & More Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 46 m Length Placeholder Yards Builder 2016 Build year 499 Gross tonnage Cayman Islands Registry Particulars Exemplar

Unavailable at present Latest Position Superyachts'R'Us Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 62 m Length Italia srl Builder 2002 Build year 612 Gross tonnage British Virgin Islands Registry Particulars Sample

The unique Regulations Radar sets out the minimum documentation owners are obliged to maintain for yachts and superyachts registered in the United Kingdom and carrying no more than 12 guests. Other ship registries have similar obligations. This page aims to set out the minimum documentation owners are obliged to maintain for yachts registered in the United Kingdom and carrying no more than 12 guests. Other flags have similar obligations. Non-compliance can lead to port detention and/or fines, and can have implications for insurance cover. Most documents will be needed by the next owner, so if you're looking to sell check that all necessary paperwork is present before your yacht is placed on the market. Don't leave it until a sale has been agreed. M-Notices and Notes are useful guides but not authoritative statements of law, and are regularly withdrawn. Home Handbook Regulation / / Regulations Radar This page aims to set out the minimum documentation owners are obliged to maintain for yachts registered in the United Kingdom and carrying no more than 12 guests. Other flags have similar obligations. Non-compliance can lead to port detention and/or fines, and can have implications for insurance cover . Most documents will be needed by the next owner, so if you're looking to sell check that all necessary paperwork is present before your yacht is placed on the market. Don't leave it until a sale has been agreed. M-Notices and Notes are useful guides but not authoritative statements of law, and are regularly withdrawn. BOTH ≥400 GT or >15 persons BOTH ≥400 GT BOTH ≥150 GT BOTH ≥24 m LOA to <400 GT BOTH ≥100 GT or >15 persons BOTH >130 kW engine(s) after 1 Jan 2000 COMMERCIAL ≥24 m LOA or ≥150 GT before 21 July 1968 COMMERCIAL ≥24 m LLL or ≥150 GT before 21 July 1968 BOTH ≥300 GT COMMERCIAL ≥300 GT BOTH all sizes COMMERCIAL all sizes PRIVATE all sizes BOTH >1000 GT COMMERCIAL ≥500 GT BOTH ≥24 m LOA PLEASE SELECT THE RELEVANT SIZE(S) TO SEE WHICH DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED AND WHY. SELECT ALL RELEVANT CATEGORIES INCLUDING SMALLER SIZES. FOR EXAMPLE, FOR 499GT SEE ≥400GT, ≥300GT, ETC WHILE GT AND USAGE CAN BE FOUND ON YOUR VESSEL'S CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION, IT IS THE ACTUAL USE TO WHICH YOUR VESSEL IS PUT WHICH IS KEY. THIS GUIDE IS NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY. CHECK THAT M-NOTICES/NOTES, REGULATIONS AND ACTS ARE STILL IN FORCE. CONTACT US FOR ASSISTANCE. THIS GUIDE IS NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY. CHECK THAT M-NOTICES/NOTES, REGULATIONS AND ACTS ARE STILL IN FORCE. CONTACT US FOR ASSISTANCE. WHILE GT AND USAGE CAN BE FOUND ON YOUR VESSEL'S CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION, IT IS THE ACTUAL USE TO WHICH YOUR VESSEL IS PUT WHICH IS KEY SELECT ALL RELEVANT CATEGORIES INCLUDING SMALLER SIZES. FOR EXAMPLE, FOR 499GT SEE ≥400GT, ≥300GT, ETC PLEASE SELECT THE RELEVANT SIZE(S) TO SEE WHICH DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED AND WHY PRIVATE all sizes N/A Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1970 Statute Merchant Shipping (Crew Agreements, Lists of Crew and Discharge of Seamen) Regulations 1991 Regulation N/A Code of Practice MGN 474 M-Notice//Note Crew Agreement and List of Crew COMMERCIAL ≥24 m LLL or ≥150 GT before 21 July 1968 Various Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Vessels in Commercial Use for Sport or Pleasure) Regulations 1998, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex M Code of Practice N/A M-Notice//Note REG Yacht Code Certificate Various Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Vessels in Commercial Use for Sport or Pleasure) Regulations 1998, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex M & N Code of Practice N/A M-Notice//Note Certificate of Classification COMMERCIAL ≥24 m LOA or ≥150 GT before 21 July 1968 International Convention on Load Lines 1966/1988 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Load Line) Regulations 1998, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex M Code of Practice MGN 579 MSN 1752 M-Notice//Note Load Line Conditions of Assignment International Convention on Load Lines 1966/1988 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Load Line) Regulations 1998, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex M Code of Practice MGN 579 MSN 1752 M-Notice//Note International Load Line Certificate International Convention on Load Lines 1966/1988 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Load Line) Regulations 1998, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Part A, Chapter 11 Code of Practice MGN 579 M-Notice//Note Stability Information COMMERCIAL all sizes Maritime Labour Convention 2006 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Maritime Labour Convention) (Survey and Certification) Regulations 2013 Regulation N/A Code of Practice MSN 1849 M-Notice//Note On-board complaints procedure International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea 1974 (SOLAS), Chapter IV Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Radio Installations) Regulations 1998 Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Part A, Chapter 16 Code of Practice MGN 530 M-Notice//Note GMDSS Log Book Maritime Labour Convention 2006 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Hours of Work) Regulations 2018 Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex G Code of Practice MSN 1877 (M) Amendment 1 M-Notice//Note Table of Shipboard Working Arrangements N/A Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1970, as amended Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Official Log Book) Regulations 1981, as amended Regulation N/A Code of Practice N/A M-Notice//Note Official Log Book Maritime Labour Convention 2006 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Maritime Labour Convention) Minimum Requirements for Seafarers etc. Regulations 2014 Regulation N/A Code of Practice MGN 477 (M) Amendment 4 M-Notice//Note Seafarer Employment Agreement Maritime Labour Convention 2006 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Hours of Work) Regulations 2018 Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex G Code of Practice MSN 1877 Amendment 1 M-Notice//Note Record of Hours of Rest of Seafarers COMMERCIAL ≥300 GT International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) 1974/1988 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Load Line) Regulations 1998, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annexes M & N Code of Practice MSN 1751 M-Notice//Note Safety Radio Certificate COMMERCIAL ≥500 GT International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Chapter XI-2 International Ship and Port Facility (ISPS) Code Convention European Communities Act 1972 (originally) Statute Ship and Port Facility (Security) Regulations 2004, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Part A, Chapter 11 Code of Practice N/A M-Notice//Note Ship Security Assessment Maritime Labour Convention 2006 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Maritime Labour Convention) (Survey and Certification) Regulations 2013 Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex G Code of Practice MSN 1848 Amendment 3 M-Notice//Note Declaration of Maritime Labour Compliance International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Chapter XI-! Convention European Communities Act 1972 (originally) Statute Ship and Port Facility (Security) Regulations 2004, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex M Code of Practice N/A M-Notice//Note Continuous Synopsis Record International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea 1974 (SOLAS), Chapter IX Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (International Safety Management (ISM) Code) Regulations 2014, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex M Code of Practice N/A M-Notice//Note Safety Management Certificate Maritime Labour Convention 2006 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Maritime Labour Convention) (Survey and Certification) Regulations 2013 Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex G Code of Practice MSN 1848 Amendment 3 M-Notice//Note Maritime Labour Certificate (including DMLC I and DMLC II) International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Chapter XI-2 International Ship and Port Facility (ISPS) Code Convention European Communities Act 1972 (originally) Statute Ship and Port Facility (Security) Regulations 2004, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex M Code of Practice N/A M-Notice//Note International Ship Security Certificate International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea 1974 (SOLAS), Chapter IX Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (International Safety Management (ISM) Code) Regulations 2014, as amended Regulation N/A Code of Practice N/A M-Notice//Note Document of Compliance International Convention on Standards of Training and Certification and Watchkeepers 1978/1995 (STCW) Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping) Regulations 2015, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex G and M Code of Practice MSN 1868 Amendment 1 M-Notice//Note Safe Manning Document International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) 1974/1988 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Survey and Certification) Regulations 2015, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annexes M & N Code of Practice MSN 1751 M-Notice//Note Safety Equipment Certificate International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) 1974/1988 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Survey and Certification) Regulations 2015, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annexes M & N Code of Practice MSN 1751 M-Notice//Note Safety Construction Certificate International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea 1974 (SOLAS), Chapter IX Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (International Safety Management (ISM) Code) Regulations 2014, as amended Regulation N/A Code of Practice N/A M-Notice//Note Safety Management System International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Chapter XI-2 & International Ship and Port Facility (ISPS) Code Convention European Communities Act 1972 (originally) Statute Ship and Port Facility (Security) Regulations 2004, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Part A, Chapter 11 Code of Practice N/A M-Notice//Note Ship Security Plan BOTH all sizes International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments 2004 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute The Merchant Shipping (Control and Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments) Regulations 2022 Regulation N/A Code of Practice None M-Notice//Note Ballast water management plan (if applicable) N/A Convention Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006 Statute N/A Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex M Code of Practice N/A M-Notice//Note Ship Station Radio Licence N/A Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping and Fishing Vessels (Health and Safety at Work) Regulations 1997, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Part A, Chapter 23A Code of Practice MGN 539 M-Notice//Note Code of Safe Working Practices International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments 2004 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute The Merchant Shipping (Control and Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments) Regulations 2022 Regulation N/A Code of Practice None M-Notice//Note Ballast water record book (if applicable) International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments 2004 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute The Merchant Shipping (Control and Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments) Regulations 2022 Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annexes L & M Code of Practice None M-Notice//Note International Ballast Water Management Certificate (if applicable) BOTH >130 kW engine(s) after 1 Jan 2000 Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973/1978 (MARPOL), Annex VI Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships) Regulations 2008, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex M Code of Practice MSN 1819 M-Notice//Note Engine International Air Pollution Prevention Certificate & NOx technical file BOTH ≥24 m LOA International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships 1969 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Tonnage) Regulations 1997, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex M Code of Practice MGN 398 M-Notice//Note International Tonnage Certificate BOTH ≥24 m LOA to <400 GT N/A Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Anti-Fouling Systems) Regulations 2009 Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annexes L & M Code of Practice MGN 398 M-Notice//Note Declaration on Anti-fouling System BOTH ≥100 GT or >15 persons Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973/1978 (MARPOL), Annex V Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Pollution by Garbage from Ships) Regulations 2020 Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annexes L & M Code of Practice MGN 398 M-Notice//Note Garbage management plan BOTH ≥150 GT Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973/1978 (MARPOL), Annex I Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Oil Pollution) Regulations 2019, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annexes L & M Code of Practice None M-Notice//Note Oil Record Book BOTH ≥300 GT N/A Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Compulsory Insurance of Shipowners for Maritime Claims) Regulations 2012 Regulation N/A Code of Practice N/A M-Notice//Note Certificate of Insurance (third party liabilities) Nairobi International Convention on the removal of Wrecks 2007 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended, & Wreck Removal Convention Act 2011 Statute N/A Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annexes L & M Code of Practice MIN 499 M-Notice//Note Wreck Removal Insurance Certificate BOTH ≥400 GT Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973/1978 (MARPOL), Annex I Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Oil Pollution) Regulations 2019, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex F Code of Practice MGN 231 M-Notice//Note Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973/1978 (MARPOL), Annex VI Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships) (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2019 Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex M Code of Practice MGN 462 M-Notice//Note International Energy Efficiency Certificate International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-Fouling Systems on Ships 2001 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Anti-Fouling Systems) Regulations 2009 Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annexes L & M Code of Practice MGN 398 M-Notice//Note International Anti-fouling System Certificate Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973/1978 (MARPOL), Annex I Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Oil Pollution) Regulations 2019, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annexes L & M Code of Practice None M-Notice//Note International Oil Pollution Prevention Certificate Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973/1978 (MARPOL), Annex VI Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships) Regulations 2008, as amended Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex M Code of Practice MSN 1819 MGN 381 MGN 386 MSN 1819 Amendment M-Notice//Note International Air Pollution Prevention Certificate Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973/1978 (MARPOL), Annex VI Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships) (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2019 Regulation N/A Code of Practice MGN 462 M-Notice//Note Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan BOTH ≥400 GT or >15 persons Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973/1978 (MARPOL), Annex IV Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Pollution by Sewage from Ships) Regulations 2020 Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex M Code of Practice MGN 631 M-Notice//Note International Sewage Pollution Prevention Certificate Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973/1978 (MARPOL), Annex V Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Pollution by Sewage from Ships) Regulations 2020 Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annex M Code of Practice MGN 632 Amendment 1 M-Notice//Note Garbage record book and reception facilities receipts BOTH >1000 GT International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage 2001 Convention Merchant Shipping Act 1995, as amended Statute Merchant Shipping (Oil Pollution) (Bunkers Convention) Regulations 2006 Regulation Red Ensign Group Yacht Code, Common Annexes, Annexes L & M Code of Practice MGN 507 (M+F) Amendment 1 M-Notice//Note Civil Liability Certificate for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage This page aims to set out the minimum documentation owners are obliged to maintain for yachts registered in the United Kingdom and carrying no more than 12 guests. Other flags have similar obligations. Non-compliance can lead to port detention and/or fines, and can have implications for insurance cover. Most documents will be needed by the next owner, so if you're looking to sell check that all necessary paperwork is present before your yacht is placed on the market. Don't leave it until a sale has been agreed. M-Notices and Notes are useful guides but not authoritative statements of law, and are regularly withdrawn.

Unavailable at present Latest Position New Horizons Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 30 m Length Builder & Co Builder 2004 Build year 70 Gross tonnage Cayman Islands Registry Particulars Snapshot

Unavailable at present Latest Position Superyachts'R'Us Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 59 m Length DMS & Co Builder 2007 Build year 308 Gross tonnage Cayman Islands Registry Particulars Archetype

Unavailable at present Latest Position Wright A Way & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 105 m Length Builder & Co Builder 2022 Build year 1980 Gross tonnage Panama Registry Particulars Role Model

Unavailable at present Latest Position Superyachts'R'Us Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 33 m Length DMS & Co Builder 2017 Build year 350 Gross tonnage Malta Registry Particulars Display

Unavailable at present Latest Position Rapid Brokers Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 50 m Length Finest Craft Builder 2004 Build year 498 Gross tonnage Cayman Islands Registry Particulars Manifestation

Unavailable at present Latest Position Superyachts'R'Us Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 88 m Length Thompson Yachts Builder 2010 Build year 1502 Gross tonnage Malta Registry Particulars Representation

Unavailable at present Latest Position Rapid Brokers Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 22 m Length Placeholder Yards Builder 2005 Build year 56 Gross tonnage British Virgin Islands Registry Particulars Innovation

Unavailable at present Latest Position Rapid Brokers Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 54 m Length DMS & Co Builder 2008 Build year 497 Gross tonnage British Virgin Islands Registry Particulars Benchmark