Unavailable at present Latest Position Rapid Brokers Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 27 m Length Finest Craft Builder 1999 Build year 240 Gross tonnage United Kingdom Registry Particulars Forerunner

Unavailable at present Latest Position Rapid Brokers Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 67 m Length Italia srl Builder 2000 Build year 608 Gross tonnage United Kingdom Registry Particulars Simulator

The International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention (‘ISM’) Code applies to a significant number of large yachts. Members may think they need have little to do with day-to-day logistics, but they would be well advised to familiarise themselves with the basics of the code. And there’s much to learn for Members owning yachts to which the Code does not apply. Home Handbook Regulation / / The ISM Code 18 May 2009 Last revised minutes 7 Reading time The International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention (‘ISM’) Code applies to a significant number of large yachts. Members may think they need have little to do with day-to-day logistics, but they would be well advised to familiarise themselves with the basics of the code. And there’s much to learn for Members owning yachts to which the Code does not apply. minutes 7 Reading time 18 May 2009 Last revised The International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention (‘ISM’) Code applies to a significant number of large yachts. Members may think they need have little to do with day-to-day logistics, but they would be well advised to familiarise themselves with the basics of the code. And there’s much to learn for Members owning yachts to which the Code does not apply. The Code developed by the International Maritime Organisation is mandatory for certain yachts flying the flag of a maritime nation and affects yachts calling at ports in these countries. The Code applies to yachts of at least 500 gross tonnage engaged in "trade," which includes chartered yachts. The Code requires the implementation of a safety management system (SMS) to ensure safety and pollution prevention. The responsibility for safety lies with the 'Company' that has assumed responsibility for the yacht's operation from the owner. The SMS consists of set procedures outlined in manuals held ashore and onboard the yacht. Non-conformities reported to the Company must be remedied, and the Company must keep itself informed and act if issues arise. Compliance with the Code also requires observance of other international and flag state safety regulations. A designated person ashore (DPA) is appointed to ensure compliance with the SMS and statutory requirements. The Company must obtain a Document of Compliance (DOC) and a Safety Management Certificate (SMC) to operate the yacht legally. The Code helps prevent pollution, but compliance is not guaranteed, and prosecutors and insurers may scrutinize the actual implementation and maintenance of safety systems. Non-conformities reported to the Company must be remedied, and the Company must keep itself informed and act if issues arise. Compliance with the Code also requires observance of other international and flag state safety regulations. A designated person ashore (DPA) is appointed to ensure compliance with the SMS and statutory requirements. The Company must obtain a Document of Compliance (DOC) and a Safety Management Certificate (SMC) to operate the yacht legally. The Code helps prevent pollution, but compliance is not guaranteed, and prosecutors and insurers may scrutinize the actual implementation and maintenance of safety systems. The Code developed by the International Maritime Organisation is mandatory for certain yachts flying the flag of a maritime nation and affects yachts calling at ports in these countries. The Code applies to yachts of at least 500 gross tonnage engaged in "trade," which includes chartered yachts. The Code requires the implementation of a safety management system (SMS) to ensure safety and pollution prevention. The responsibility for safety lies with the 'Company' that has assumed responsibility for the yacht's operation from the owner. The SMS consists of set procedures outlined in manuals held ashore and onboard the yacht. The Code was developed by the International Maritime Organisation and, being uncontroversial, has become a part of domestic law in most maritime nations. The Code is therefore mandatory on board certain yachts flying the ensign of such a country, under what is known as the ‘flag state’ law. It also affects certain yachts calling at ports in some of these countries, by virtue of the ‘port state’ law, even if it is not required by the flag state law. The Code does not apply to all yachts subject to a particular flag state law, however. It only applies to those of at least 500 gross tonnage (GT) which are engaged in ‘trade’. Yachts which are chartered will normally be considered to be engaged in trade. SCOPE The Code concerns a great deal more than just having the right number of fire extinguishers or liferafts. It requires owners (or their appointed managers) to put in place management systems which are designed to ensure that the yacht is operated with the utmost regard to safety and pollution prevention. A complete culture of safety and continual improvement must be created. RESPONSIBILITY Where the yacht is technically owned by a single-purpose offshore owning company, ultimate responsibility for safety can nevertheless still lie with the beneficial owner. Responsibility under the Code, however, is said to lie with the ‘Company’. The Company is the party which has assumed responsibility for the operation of the yacht from the owner: it must establish the appropriate policies, and provide the necessary resources and shore-based support. The Company could be anyone, but someone has to formerly agree to take on this role if the owner is to avoid liability. This is where the managers step in. Under the Code, arranging safety systems becomes a surprisingly specialised task. This is why the managers should be chosen, and engaged, with the utmost care and attention to detail. SYSTEM The Company must implement a safety management system (‘SMS’), consisting of set, verifiable procedures. These are tailored to the individual yacht, and should ensure that the yacht is run in a way which complies with the Code. The SMS is contained in sets of manuals, held both ashore and on board. They typically outline the system itself, state general safety and environmental policies, and describe the organisation of the Company. Shoreside manuals will set out the régime for audits, risk assessment and accident analysis. Shipboard manuals will also give the planning, operating and reporting procedures. They cannot just be left on the shelf like an engine manual, however. Port inspectors, for example, may examine the manuals and interview the crew, who will be expected to be both familiar with them and actually using them. Key operational procedures and corrections are planned and recorded, as well as being audited internally and externally. Taken out of context some procedures may appear almost laughably prescriptive. In fact, in the context of the Code, this process leads both to a continual process of refinement, and independently certifiable standards of conduct. NON-CONFORMITY Where a Code ‘non-conformity’ is reported to the Company but is not remedied, or if a blind eye is turned to it, or if the system is such that non-conformities go reported, the Company will be in breach of the Code. Before the Code was introduced, the owner or manager could have legitimately said that there may have been safety issues on board the yacht which they were not aware about. By contrast, the burden is now on the Company to keep itself informed and act if all is not in order. All roles are now more accurately defined, meaning that it is now much easier to assess after an incident who was responsible for what, and what they knew or should have known. FURTHER COMPLIANCE The Code also requires and ensures observance of other international and flag state safety regulations. The obvious example is the fire drill, which cannot be meaningfully conducted unless all the correct fire fighting equipment is present. In fact, compliance with the Code requires compliance with a considerable array of international maritime conventions, ranging from crew training to vessel stability. From the owner’s point of view, this is a good thing. DESIGNATED PERSON A formal line of communication must exist between the Company and the yacht. This is absolutely vital. The Company has to appoint a designated person ashore (normally abbreviated to ‘DPA’ or ‘DP’) to sit at one and of that line. His (or her) job is to keep an eye on the safe and efficient operation of the yacht as the SMS demands, and take all necessary steps to ensure compliance. The DP must also ensure that proper provision is made for the yacht to be manned, equipped and maintained such that it is fit to operate in accordance with both the SMS and whichever other statutory requirements are dreamt up from time to time. The role of DP is often combined with others such as Technical or Operations Manager. In order that the DP is able to do all this, he must have: Direct access to the highest level of the Company’s management; Sufficient authority to influence decision-making; and Appropriate knowledge and experience of the operation of the type of yacht in question. So important is the DP’s role, that he may be jailed by the flag state should he fail to discharge certain key responsibilities. Port states can also be merciless with a DP, even where the DP is based overseas. A DP based in Denmark, for example, was recently the subject to an indictment by the United States Department of Justice. As the DP can be called upon to take action at any time, a deputy may be appointed. Some managers have been known to appoint personal assistants or secretaries to this role. This is poor practice, and indicates a culture of profit over safety. Beyond the DP and his deputy, the Code states that the Company must ensure that all personnel involved with the SMS have an adequate understanding of the relevant rules, regulations, codes and guidelines. Safety used to be the Captain’s domain, or at least the buck stopped with him or her. In terms of the immediate safety of the yacht, this remains the case. As the Company bears the responsibility of Code compliance on behalf of the owner, the existence of the DP ensures that the Company cannot leave responsibility resting on the Captain’s shoulders. Captains and managers must work together to ensure an adequate and workable system is developed. This is enshrined in the preamble to the Code, which explicitly states that in matters of safety and pollution prevention it is the commitment, competence, attitudes and motivation of individuals at all levels that determines the end result. LIABILITY Before the Code was imposed, yacht managers tended to take on the role of owner’s agent. They might have assisted the owner’s accountants, but it was the Captain who had the most to do the owner. The arrangement was based on reducing hassle for owners as much as possible. This arrangement may still, of course, suit owners of yachts not subject to the Code. As managers must take up a more interfering and directing role by virtue of the Code, there is no scope for resentment of this on the part of the crew. Instead, comfort should be taken in the fact that liability is shared with those ashore, who must keep safety issues under close scrutiny, and make sufficient resources available. Nevertheless, the owner may wish to keep an eye on whether the manager’s style is becoming too autocratic, perhaps leading to a dissatisfied crew. CERTIFICATION Once auditors from the flag state have examined the SMS, both on paper and in practice, a Document of Compliance (‘DOC’) will be issued in respect of the Company. A Safety Management Certificate (‘SMC’) may then be issued in respect of the yacht managed by that Company, as long as the SMS has been successfully implemented on board. Both these documents must be in place for the yacht to be operated legally. They will be audited regularly. Because of the number of individuals involved in the planning, undertaking and recording of actions, and the independence of external auditors, deliberate falsifications are sure to highlight themselves. Where logs have been ‘flogged’, i.e. where false entries have been made with regard to, for example, hours worked, the DOC may be withdrawn immediately. APPEARANCES In comparison with trading ships, yachts may appear to have an unblemished safety record. This is a little illusory. Whilst crewmembers may exude joyful efficiency, and the yachts themselves are kept in immaculate condition, this can have more to do with complying with the owner’s aesthetic wishes than with the maintenance of a safety culture. Accidents involving yachts do happen: they tend, however, not to involve large scale loss of life or pollution, and are not especially newsworthy. That courteous crewmember may in fact have worked excessive hours during a busy charter season, or may have been left in command without the necessary experience or qualifications. INSURANCE Following an incident, insurers will consider their liability for the claim thoroughly. Standard insurance clauses typically allow an insurer to avoid paying out, if the yacht was subject to certain perils resulting from a lack of ‘due diligence’ by the yacht’s management. The actions of the Company will be open to scrutiny by the insurer seeking to establish whether due diligence was exercised, and will be subject to a post-incident analysis. The ISM Code paper-trail is the obvious starting point. All documents in the possession of the Company which may be useful to the insurer, including internal documents, may have to be made available in the event of litigation. Any conviction of the Company or DP for Code failings would provide the insurer with the best possible evidence of a failure to exercise due diligence. INSPECTIONS Inspections of yachts by port officials tend to occur less frequently than for trading ships. This is understandable given that yachts tend to wear more respectable ensigns, and it is normally the official policy at ports to concentrate inspections on vessels which are likely to pose the greatest hazard to that port and the surrounding coastline. Nevertheless, where safety failings lead to even trivial incidents, authorities may choose to detain or even take action against a yacht herself, making the use of standard liability-avoidance vehicles, such as companies and trusts, futile measures. The knock-on effects of breached charter agreements and all-round inconvenience are obviously best avoided. The fact that the Code also helps to prevent pollution is a very good thing as far as owners are concerned. Pollution in some jurisdictions can lead to surprisingly hefty fines and even imprisonment. Spotter planes can find offending yachts with ease, and it is surprising how far even the smallest quantity of fuel will spread across the water. Unfortunately, the Company cannot simply wave the DOC and SMC in the air and expect forgiveness from prosecutors or insurers. Whilst useful, neither guarantees compliance. They simply show that, at a particular point in time in the past, the SMS, as applied by the Company and on board the yacht, met the minimum internationally agreed standards. Further, the external audit which led to the award of the DOC and SMC will have been based only on samples, will not have taken that long, and will have been far from exhaustive. By contrast, once a prosecutor or insurance company is able to access the various manuals and records, these can be scrutinised against actual findings at their leisure. It has been recognised that less respectable flag states may chose to ignore their responsibilities and may be prepared to certify compliance in any event. CONCLUSION From a legal viewpoint, the Code can be the owner’s closest ally or most feared enemy, depending on just how successful its implementation and maintenance has actually been. Owners do least have the luxury of being able to buy-in the appropriate expertise. Arranging and maintaining Code safety systems is a highly specialised task, however, and owners should grasp the fundamentals of the Code, and choose the appropriate managers accordingly. Thereafter, they should consider whether the managers and crew are successfully working together: this required by the Code and is important for morale and staff retention. Although the implementation of the Code does involve more paperwork and expense, it is the consequence of concerns about ineffective safety management stretching back many decades. Full and successful implementation will go a long way to ensuring that physical safety and pollution risks are kept under control. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Port State Control Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Port State Control

The loan agreement and/or the deed of covenant will provide that the ship mortgage will become enforceable following a defined default event. What constitutes default will be set out in the loan agreement – and will cover more than just a failure to make loan repayments. A breach of any term of the security documentation, in particular positive or negative covenants, can constitute a default. Home Handbook Financing / / Loan Enforcement 3 March 2014 Last revised minutes 3 Reading time The loan agreement and/or the deed of covenant will provide that the ship mortgage will become enforceable following a defined default event. What constitutes default will be set out in the loan agreement – and will cover more than just a failure to make loan repayments. A breach of any term of the security documentation, in particular positive or negative covenants, can constitute a default. minutes 3 Reading time 3 March 2014 Last revised The loan agreement and/or the deed of covenant will provide that the ship mortgage will become enforceable following a defined default event. What constitutes default will be set out in the loan agreement – and will cover more than just a failure to make loan repayments. A breach of any term of the security documentation, in particular positive or negative covenants, can constitute a default. When there is a default, the lender may choose to waive it or demand that it be corrected by the borrower. The lender can enforce the mortgage through a deed of covenant that grants specific powers. The deed of covenant allows the lender to order the yacht to a specific port, manage the yacht, take possession of it, and sell it. The lender can use a power of attorney granted by the borrower to act on their behalf, including selling the yacht. Lenders have pre-existing rights, such as taking possession of the yacht or selling it when loan repayments are outstanding. Lenders can arrest the yacht through a court application, leading to a judicial sale that may attract higher prices. The lender is responsible for immediate expenses incurred after the arrest, such as crew salaries and mooring fees. The lender can apply for an order of sale before judgment, which involves appraisal, valuation, and advertising for sealed bids. If a default occurs during a charter, the lender's rights may be restricted if it interferes with the charter, but certain conditions must be met. The lender's claim as a mortgagee is prioritized over unpaid creditors with maritime liens and possessory liens. After a court sale, proceeds are distributed in a specific order. Lenders can arrest the yacht through a court application, leading to a judicial sale that may attract higher prices. The lender is responsible for immediate expenses incurred after the arrest, such as crew salaries and mooring fees. The lender can apply for an order of sale before judgment, which involves appraisal, valuation, and advertising for sealed bids. If a default occurs during a charter, the lender's rights may be restricted if it interferes with the charter, but certain conditions must be met. The lender's claim as a mortgagee is prioritized over unpaid creditors with maritime liens and possessory liens. After a court sale, proceeds are distributed in a specific order. When there is a default, the lender may choose to waive it or demand that it be corrected by the borrower. The lender can enforce the mortgage through a deed of covenant that grants specific powers. The deed of covenant allows the lender to order the yacht to a specific port, manage the yacht, take possession of it, and sell it. The lender can use a power of attorney granted by the borrower to act on their behalf, including selling the yacht. Lenders have pre-existing rights, such as taking possession of the yacht or selling it when loan repayments are outstanding. Where there is a default, the lender decide that the commercial relationship is worth saving. The lender may therefore choose to waive the default – either unconditionally or if the borrower complies with new conditions. Alternatively, the lender may demand that a default be put right by the borrower or even put things right itself and charge the borrower for this – such as renewing an insurance policy. If all else fails, the lender may press ahead with enforcement action. CONTRACTUAL ENFORCEMENT The deed of covenant sets out the lender’s enforcement powers, exercisable once the mortgage has become enforceable. This is on top of the rights existing in law anyway (set out below). Typical rights granted by the deed of covenant include the following: To order the captain to proceed to a port nominated by the lender – which will be within a jurisdiction where arresting the yacht is particularly easy or convenient; To manage the yacht, including chartering her out (assuming that the yacht is commercially registered and insured for chartering), and even replacing the entire crew if need be; To take possession of the yacht ahead of a sale, and take her to a jurisdiction where a relatively rapid sale can be concluded or where the lender will rank higher than other creditors; and To sell the yacht, either by public action or private sale. POWER OF ATTORNEY As well as the borrower’s covenants, the lender can use any power of attorney granted by the borrower to the lender, by which the lender can act in the borrower’s name to correct any default, or even go so far as to sell the yacht without much further ado. PRE-EXISTING RIGHTS Beyond the lenders rights which exist by virtue of the borrower’s covenants and any power of attorney, the law automatically gives lenders the ability to do any of the following: To take possession of the yacht, where the borrower has actually defaulted on loan repayments, or the lender’s security has been compromised as a result of the borrower’s (in)actions. In reality, this is rare as the lender will be on the hook for operational costs – even assuming that the lender has the relevant experience or can procure this at short notice. To sell the yacht, but only when the mortgage repayments are outstanding, and not simply where covenants have been breached: for this the lender will have to rely on the express provisions of the loan agreement and deed of covenant. To arrest the yacht, on application to the court, as a procedural step leading to the judicial sale of the vessel. A judicial sale may be preferred over a sale by the lenders this allows a buyer to but a yacht free from pre-existing liens and encumbrances – which benefits may help to boost the price of what will otherwise be something of a fire sale. The arrest of a yacht will result in the court’s officer, the Admiralty Marshal, incurring expenses right away, such as crew salaries, mooring fees and essential maintenance. The lender’s lawyer must provide a personal undertaking to pay such expenses, and will need a considerable sum paid to his or her firm on account. The lender will also need to arrange first and third party insurance if need be. Following arrest, the lender may apply to the court, even before judgment has been handed down, for an order for sale. The court order will contain instructions for the Admiralty Marshal to have the yacht appraised, valued and advertised for sale, typically on a sealed bid basis. The Admiralty Marshal’s Conditions of Sale will apply, under which – if the Admiralty Marshal accepts a sealed offer – the buyer must pay 10% right away and the balance within one week. CHARTERS Should a default occur when a charter has been booked or the she’s out on charter, the lender, as mortgagee, will be bound by the terms of charter, and prevented from exercising its rights under the mortgage, such as taking possession, arrest and/or sale, where doing so would interfere with the charter, as long as: Undertaking or completion of the charter doesn’t compromise the lender’s security; and The borrower is willing and able to complete the charter. PRIORITY Even with all the loan documentation, covenants, etc, in place, a lender’s claim as mortgagee is trumped by those with maritime liens such as unpaid crew, or those with a possessory lien such as a refit yard. This is the case even though neither maritime nor possessory liens can be registered anywhere. Mortgagees will take priority over all other unpaid creditors. The deed of covenant will usually stipulate that, following sale, the lender’s costs and expenses are paid first, then the outstanding principal and interest will be paid off. The borrower will then receive any amount left over. Following a court sale, the proceeds are distributed in the following order: Admiralty Marshal’s fees and expenses; Lender’s legal costs; Maritime liens; Possessory liens; Mortgages and charges over the yacht, in order of registration; and Statutory liens. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Leasing Overview Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Leasing Overview

Unavailable at present Latest Position Yachts & More Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 28 m Length Finest Craft Builder 2006 Build year 150 Gross tonnage Marshall Islands Registry Particulars Prototype

Converting working and naval ships in to yachts can save time and money, and the results can be spectacular. As each project is unique and challenging, it is crucial that terms are agreed with the yard undertaking the work which are clear, fair and practical. And each such agreement will be a one-off. Home Handbook Upcycling / / Conversion Agreements 10 August 2019 Last revised minutes 5 Reading time Converting working and naval ships into yachts can save time and money, and the results can be spectacular. Each project is unique and challenging. It is crucial that the terms agreed with the yard undertaking the work are clear, fair and practical. And each such agreement will be as unique as the project. minutes 5 Reading time 10 August 2019 Last revised Converting working and naval ships into yachts can save time and money, and the results can be spectacular. Each project is unique and challenging. It is crucial that the terms agreed with the yard undertaking the work are clear, fair and practical. And each such agreement will be as unique as the project. By choice, most shipping agreements, including yachting, are governed by English law regardless of the parties' location. Conversion agreements are subject to the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982, which implies terms such as satisfactory quality and reasonable fitness for purpose. Yards must use reasonable care and skill in providing services, but it may not meet the high standards expected in yachts. Parties should seek legal advice to create fair and workable terms for conversion agreements. The price for conversion works is usually a fixed fee payable in installments, with adjustments for changes in specifications. The scope of works should be clearly defined, including repair and conversion components, with detailed technical specifications and objective performance standards. The agreement should address interface risks and allocate responsibility for inaccuracies in plans and specifications. A specific timeframe, known as the Redelivery Date, should be agreed upon, with provisions for liquidated damages and cancellation if the project overruns. Other key provisions include force majeure clauses, security arrangements, material ownership, insurance coverage, and warranty periods for remedying faults. The scope of works should be clearly defined, including repair and conversion components, with detailed technical specifications and objective performance standards. The agreement should address interface risks and allocate responsibility for inaccuracies in plans and specifications. A specific timeframe, known as the Redelivery Date, should be agreed upon, with provisions for liquidated damages and cancellation if the project overruns. Other key provisions include force majeure clauses, security arrangements, material ownership, insurance coverage, and warranty periods for remedying faults. By choice, most shipping agreements, including yachting, are governed by English law regardless of the parties' location. Conversion agreements are subject to the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982, which implies terms such as satisfactory quality and reasonable fitness for purpose. Yards must use reasonable care and skill in providing services, but it may not meet the high standards expected in yachts. Parties should seek legal advice to create fair and workable terms for conversion agreements. The price for conversion works is usually a fixed fee payable in installments, with adjustments for changes in specifications. Most agreements in shipping (including yachting) are governed, by contract if not otherwise, by English law – no matter where in the world the parties are. Unlike shipbuilding agreements, which under English law are contracts for the sale and purchase of goods, conversion agreements are, broadly, contracts for the sale and purchase of labour combined with a supply of materials. As such, they are governed by the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 (as amended) and thereby subject to the same implied terms that apply to a contract for the sale of goods, namely that the materials must be of “ satisfactory quality ” and “ reasonably fit ” for any specific purpose expressly or implicitly disclosed to the yard. Further, in providing services, the yard must merely use “ reasonable care and skill ” – which the courts have determined means “ the ordinary skill of an ordinary competent [person] performing that particular art .” The result may be far from the highest standards of workmanship expected in the context of yachts. Far better, then, to agree to certain objective specifications being met. KEY PROVISIONS As with yacht building, there is no standard conversion agreement for parties to use and adapt. Elements of standard shipbuilding, and standard yacht refit, agreements could be used but the parties should take advice at the outset so that fair and workable terms are agreed – including some of the following key terms. PRICE Works are typically carried on for fixed fee, payable in instalments following the completion of particular stages of the conversion. Changes in specifications are reflected in adjustments agreed to the fee. Owners should insist on unit prices for labour and key materials being fixed at the outset, in order that the yard cannot raise these unduly in respect of additional works. SCOPE Setting out the scope of the works to be completed is key. There is no alternative to drafting a detailed technical specification – including plans, objective performance and/or finish standards to be achieved. It's helpful to divide the scope into two distinct components: A repair scope, setting out the elements needing repair following the thorough pre-purchase survey; and A conversion scope, setting out what needs to be added – or removed – in order for the vessel to become a yacht. The repair scope will need some inherent flexibility as the repairs themselves may reveal further issues which weren’t apparent during the survey, while the conversion scope can, and should, be very rigid. In addition, the conversion agreement will have to describe standards to be met by the yard in respect of the works. Vague standards often used in the context of trading vessels – such as “ first class ” shipbuilding standards – should be avoided, and objective standards used. Comparisons can be made to other existing vessels. But ideally, reference should be made to Classification Society Rules or other objective standards and measurements. There are few, if any, aspects which can’t be measured objectively – which is crucial especially where the yard isn’t used to the very high standards expected by yacht owners. Converting a vessel into a yacht may pose “interface risks”. These are the risks of a failure of materials and/or design where new materials and equipment are installed into an existing structure. So, if possible, the yard should bear such risks. Yards can require owners to warrant that plans and specifications of the vessel as it comes into the yard are accurate – meaning that additional expenses arising from any inaccuracies will be for the owner’s account. TIMEFRAME Parties will need to agree that the works should be finished by a specific date, typically referred to as the Redelivery Date – with fixed amounts of money (known by lawyers as “liquidated damages”) payable for each day that the project overruns. This avoids otherwise lengthy and expensive arguments about quantifying loss of use. And if the overrun goes beyond an agreed date, the owner must be allowed to cancel the agreement and take the vessel for completion elsewhere. Yards will need to prepare for the vessel’s arrival well ahead of time. In particular, other projects may need to be relocated within the yard to make space. Manpower will need to be arranged. Supplies will have been ordered and/or delivered, and third-party contractors may have been booked or will be on standby. The yard will therefore want to be notified of the actual arrival date – and be updated on her progress towards the yard – irrespective of the specific agreed starting date. The agreement will typically specify what will happen if the vessel is delivered late, with the yard usually being allowed to extend the contractual redelivery date by the same amount of time. Alternatively, the redelivery date may be replaced by an obligation on the yard’s part to finish the work and redeliver the vessel within a reasonable amount of time. FORCE MAJEURE Force majeure clauses automatically retard the redelivery date by an amount of time equivalent to that of the delaying event – where such event is due to certain circumstances beyond the yard’s control. As with the timeframe for the works, it is wise to have a long-stop date, beyond which the owner can cancel the agreement and take the vessel away elsewhere for completion. SECURITY It must be expressly agreed that the owner at all times retains title in the vessel, and all her machinery, equipment and items awaiting installation. Indeed, the owner may need to keep a skeleton crew on board, at least a build captain, for the duration of the works. The conversion agreement should also state that the owner acquires title to the works and equipment that are continuously added as the project progresses. As owner, should you wish to cancel the project prior to completion, your remedies are normally limited to removing your project for completion at a second yard, and suing the yard for any additional completion costs over and above the outstanding balance of the price agreed with the first yard. This will take time – especially where enforcement proceedings are required in the yard’s own jurisdiction – and some legal costs may not be recoverable. Far better, then, to obtain a performance guarantee or completion bond, giving security against major cost overruns when finishing the vessel elsewhere. MATERIALS With a steady throughflow of materials at the yard, there is scope for disagreement over who owns what at any given time. It is vital to establish this, as such materials must be insured, and protected from the yard’s creditors in the event of insolvency. The yard must ensure that such provisions in the conversion agreement do not contradict the terms under which such materials have been bought by the yard form third party suppliers. Where ownership has passed to the owner, the yard may want to have a contractual lien over such materials in case of a future non-payment by the owner. INSURANCE It’s vital that the owner and yard agree on how the risks of loss or damage to the vessel and materials will be covered. This includes owner-supplied items being stored ashore at the yard. Owners usually maintain their Hull & Machinery (first party) and Third Party Liability policies. And it’s vital not only to discuss the works in detail with insurance brokers , but to be as certain as possible that the underwriters themselves have been notified and agree to the scope of the works, which yard is to be used, etc. Particular attention must be paid to policy terms, especially any requiring the vessel to remain fully crewed at all times. It would be unwise to assume that underwriters will overlook such a requirement just because the vessel is subject to extensive works. WARRANTY A warranty period of twelve months is typical – during which the yard is contractually obliged to remedy faults arising – as is normally found in build agreements. However, the warranty will need to be carefully drafted to avoid disputes over whether is it the new or original parts or equipment which have failed, and if it’s the original elements whether this is due to the presence of the new elements. Yards will often only agree to limit its liability to the repair of its own defective materials or workmanship. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Conversion Projects Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Conversion Projects

Unavailable at present Latest Position Superyachts'R'Us Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 62 m Length Italia srl Builder 2002 Build year 612 Gross tonnage British Virgin Islands Registry Particulars Sample

Traditionally, large yachts are owned through companies and trusts, typically based in small offshore locations. However, their use can still leave owners liable for non-compliance with the law. This article examines the reasons behind the tradition, and considers how effective companies and trusts can be at insulating the owner from the liabilities of ownership. Home Handbook Buying / / Corporate Ownership 8 August 2014 Last revised minutes 5 Reading time Traditionally, large yachts are owned through companies and trusts, typically based in small offshore locations. However, their use can still leave owners liable for non-compliance with the law. This article examines the reasons behind the tradition, and considers how effective companies and trusts can be at insulating the owner from the liabilities of ownership. minutes 5 Reading time 8 August 2014 Last revised Traditionally, large yachts are owned through companies and trusts, typically based in small offshore locations. However, their use can still leave owners liable for non-compliance with the law. This article examines the reasons behind the tradition, and considers how effective companies and trusts can be at insulating the owner from the liabilities of ownership. Companies have their own legal personality and can buy and sell goods and services like individuals. Trusts are arrangements where property is handed over for the benefit of another, with legal rights enforceable by the courts. Companies and trusts can help reduce personal tax exposure and protect assets, such as yachts. Owning a yacht through a company can ring-fence liability and protect other assets. Companies and trusts can isolate ownership in politically unstable countries or protect against creditors. Establishing transactions through a company provides personal liability protection for directors and shareholders. Yachts can be arrested following accidents, pollution allegations, or unpaid services, requiring payment or security to release them. 'Lifting the corporate veil' allows individuals involved in fraudulent transactions to be held liable. Companies cannot be used to evade legal obligations, and privacy may not be entirely guaranteed. Offshore jurisdictions are commonly used for private, tax-efficient business operations, and careful consideration is needed when choosing one. Yachts can be arrested following accidents, pollution allegations, or unpaid services, requiring payment or security to release them. 'Lifting the corporate veil' allows individuals involved in fraudulent transactions to be held liable. Companies cannot be used to evade legal obligations, and privacy may not be entirely guaranteed. Offshore jurisdictions are commonly used for private, tax-efficient business operations, and careful consideration is needed when choosing one. Companies have their own legal personality and can buy and sell goods and services like individuals. Trusts are arrangements where property is handed over for the benefit of another, with legal rights enforceable by the courts. Companies and trusts can help reduce personal tax exposure and protect assets, such as yachts. Owning a yacht through a company can ring-fence liability and protect other assets. Companies and trusts can isolate ownership in politically unstable countries or protect against creditors. Establishing transactions through a company provides personal liability protection for directors and shareholders. Companies are said by lawyers to have their own ‘legal personality’. This curious phrase just means that they are able to buy and sell goods and services in just the same way as an individual person. Although the idea was dreamt up to allow entrepreneurs to raise money without the fear of loosing all their remaining wealth should their business not succeed, companies can also be used in a non-commercial way to own assets – such as yachts. TRUSTS Trusts are a rather different concept. They have no such personality. They are simply an arrangement whereby property is handed over by one party (the ‘settlor’) to another (the ‘trustee’) for the benefit of another (the ‘beneficiary’), on the basis that the property will be held and used as the trustee wishes. Although legal title is actually transferred from the settlor to the trustee, the trustee’s and beneficiary’s rights are recognisable and enforceable by the courts. As with companies, the use of trusts has come along way since their invention – they were first used to protect the property of medieval knights while away on crusade. Although until recently a concept only recognised in United Kingdom Commonwealth countries and other former colonies, it is now possible to establish trusts in countries with very different legal traditions, such as China. BENEFITS Although establishing and administering either a company or a trust is not without expense, they make a lot of sense when it comes to buying and owning a yacht. Most importantly, companies and trusts can also be used, quite lawfully, to reduce an individual’s apparent wealth and subsequent personal tax exposure. Companies are also used to form the basis of VAT-avoidance structures, by putting the use of a yacht on a commercial basis and through the use of cross-border leases. Now and then, yachts are involved in accidents. Liability could easily exceed the value of the yacht, and, should the owner be held liable, his or her other assets are at risk. More sensible, then, to ring-fence any such source of liability by owning the yacht through a company. Similarly, companies and trusts can help to isolate ownership where wealth is derived from developing or otherwise unstable countries, where there is a risk of political rivals attempting to expropriate personal possessions. And for those in even the most stable surroundings, protection from creditors is usually desirable where the owner wants to indulge in large, commercial risk-taking. By law, yachts must be registered somewhere. Shipping registers being open to inspection by the public, details of a yacht’s owner are readily available. Most owners just don’t like the idea of tabloid journalists – or perhaps even former spouses – knowing what they own. Although the identity of company directors and shareholders is often a matter of public record, many jurisdictions allow directorships and shares to be held in the name of nominees. The beauty of undertaking transactions through a company is that it is the company that undertakes the transaction, not the directors or shareholders, meaning that the latter can bask safe in the knowledge that they are largely immune from personal liability. YACHT ARREST This comfortable state of affairs cannot, however, prevent the arrest of the yacht itself. Where this happens, the yacht is legally prevented from leaving her mooring. Typically, police or customs officers present the yacht with the court papers – this is the process which used to involve the nailing of a writ to the mast. Yachts are often arrested following a collision, an allegation of pollution, or where a good or service has been provided to the yacht without the provider (including crew) having been paid. There is no need for judgment to have been given and there may be little or no warning before the yacht is arrested – potentially leaving the owner in an awkward and embarrassing position in the middle of a busy charter season. The only way to release the yacht from arrest is either to pay the claim or to provide security. Such security may only be acceptable if provided or supported by a large bank. In turn, the bank will require a personal guarantee from the yacht’s ultimate owner. LIMITATIONS On occasion it may be possible to look behind the company at the individuals involved. This is known as ‘lifting the corporate veil.’ The laws of certain jurisdictions, for example, state that where it appears that, in the course of winding-up a bankrupt company, transactions have been carried out with the intent to defraud creditors, a court may declare the individuals involved liable. Criminal sanctions can also apply. ‘Creditors’ here only includes those owed money at the time the transfer was made, excluding future creditors. The burden of proving the necessary intent lies with the creditors. The same principle applies where it looks as if a company was set up to frustrate a court order to freeze assets. Further, companies cannot be used to circumvent legal obligations. This does not mean that individuals will be liable if the company’s legal obligations are breached, but if the company is set up just because a legal obligation (such as complying with safety requirements in respect of a large yacht) is inconvenient or expensive to comply with, then the veil could be lifted. The use of nominees only prevents the true identity of directors and shareholders being made available to the public. It is not normally possible to offload liability onto the nominees, and there is likely to be a clause in the agreement to set up the company, obliging the actual directors and shareholders to indemnify the nominees. Privacy cannot be entirely guaranteed in any event. Not unreasonably, international treaties on the exchange of information relating to criminal activities, including tax evasion, can allow require even the strongest privacy laws to be brushed aside. Property placed in a trust may still be made the subject of asset freezing orders and court judgments if a trust is not recognised, although if the property is physically located in the same country that the trust is administered from, this will be difficult. A number of countries, including the United Kingdom, are party to an international convention on the recognition of trusts, known as the Hague Convention, recognising trusts which conform to certain characteristics. JURISDICTIONS Offshore jurisdictions still have a reputation as being sun-baked islands where dodgy deals can be concluded in an unregulated financial free-for-all. Nothing could be further from the truth for the vast majority of commonly-used locations. In fact, virtually all the world’s leading multinationals use offshore companies and trusts to undertake business in a private, tax-efficient yet entirely legal way. ‘Offshore’ simply means a jurisdiction other the one someone is already resident or domiciled in for tax purposes. They certainly don’t need to be either sunny or insular, although many are as it can form a lucrative boost to otherwise small, remote and tourist-dependent economies. In fact, a good example of a growing offshore centre is the United Kingdom. For yacht owners, the principal advantage of using a respectable, well-known offshore jurisdiction is that there is rarely the need to reinvent the wheel: they are geared up to provide yacht owning structures. As these activities often provide a sizeable proportion of foreign income, their governments make it a priority to make matters simple for those looking for this type of service. It is important to choose the jurisdiction(s) with care, however. No two are the same. There are bad apples in the barrel, especially with regards the integrity of local practitioners. With companies, but more particularly with trusts – where legal title is transferred to a local trustee who may perhaps have discretionary powers – there exists opportunities to extract more from their clients than had been expected. CHOICE Other factors to consider include initial and ongoing costs (including local taxes), international reputation, and the strength of their rule of law – in other words how tough their courts are. Political stability is another important factor, as is the time zone, the exchange controls, and any escape provisions – which allow companies to change jurisdictions while maintaining their legal personality and trusts to be transferred without needing to be rewritten. Working with a local branch of an international legal or accounting group may provide reassurance, but on the other hand one may end up being steered towards just those places where they happen to have an office. Ideally, guidance in the earliest stages should be sought from an independent, trusted source, capable of providing a truly impartial, global overview. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about The Brokers' Role Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about The Brokers' Role

Unavailable at present Latest Position Yachts & More Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 32 m Length Thompson Yachts Builder 2018 Build year 347 Gross tonnage United Kingdom Registry Particulars Token

Most yacht builders have their own ‘just sign here’ standard build terms. They vary enormously in length and complexity. Such agreements often miss out important aspects and can be subject to local law and jurisdiction - whose courts may not be impartial and where you may struggle to find competent, specialist lawyers. Don’t sign them. Contact us for guidance. Given the amount of money at stake, such contracts should only be viewed as an opening to contractual negotiations. Home Handbook Building / / The Build Agreement 10 May 2023 Last revised minutes 10 Reading time Most builders have their own ‘just sign here’ standard build terms. They vary enormously in length and complexity. Such agreements often miss out important aspects and can be subject to local law and jurisdiction - whose courts may not be impartial and where you may struggle to find competent, specialist lawyers. Don’t sign them. Contact us for guidance. Given the amount of money at stake, such contracts should only be viewed as an opening to contractual negotiations. minutes 10 Reading time 10 May 2023 Last revised Most builders have their own ‘just sign here’ standard build terms. They vary enormously in length and complexity. Such agreements often miss out important aspects and can be subject to local law and jurisdiction - whose courts may not be impartial and where you may struggle to find competent, specialist lawyers. Don’t sign them. Contact us for guidance. Given the amount of money at stake, such contracts should only be viewed as an opening to contractual negotiations. Privacy concerns and the need for NDAs should be addressed early on with the engagement of an experienced lawyer. Payments should be made upon completion of build milestones, with independent surveyor signoff, and account for material costs, transport, and exchange rates. Security measures should be in place to protect against builder insolvency, including ownership transfer and guarantees from the builder's bank. Consider local legal requirements for ownership transfer and potential statutory liens by unpaid subcontractors. Clearly define the triggering events and duration of guarantees to ensure protection in case of builder insolvency or yacht issues. Establish clear and rigid procedures for change orders to avoid cost overruns and delays. Subcontractors should be carefully vetted, and the builder should remain liable for their mistakes. Materials should not be subject to title retention. Specify insurance requirements for the part-built project and ensure the wording is adequate and obtained from reputable insurers. Address force majeure events, their effect on the delivery date, and the need for a cap. Clarify buyer-ordered modifications' impact on delays. Ensure all correct legal documents for the yacht's registration are presented before final payment and agree on the place of legal delivery. Allow access for tests, inspections, and reasonable rectification of faults before delivery. Define criteria for acceptance or rejection of the yacht. Formal testing at sea is necessary to verify performance against specifications, and a margin of tolerance with incremental compensation may be agreed upon. Establish the buyer's right to refuse delivery if faults are not rectified, and differentiate between minor non-conformities and deliverable condition requirements. Warranty period should be agreed upon for materials and workmanship, and provisions for rectifying defects and compensation should be addressed. Dispute resolution mechanisms should include independent technical experts for technical matters and arbitration or litigation for non-technical or high-value disputes. Consider enforceability and confidentiality aspects when choosing between arbitration and litigation. Ensure all correct legal documents for the yacht's registration are presented before final payment and agree on the place of legal delivery. Allow access for tests, inspections, and reasonable rectification of faults before delivery. Define criteria for acceptance or rejection of the yacht. Formal testing at sea is necessary to verify performance against specifications, and a margin of tolerance with incremental compensation may be agreed upon. Establish the buyer's right to refuse delivery if faults are not rectified, and differentiate between minor non-conformities and deliverable condition requirements. Warranty period should be agreed upon for materials and workmanship, and provisions for rectifying defects and compensation should be addressed. Dispute resolution mechanisms should include independent technical experts for technical matters and arbitration or litigation for non-technical or high-value disputes. Consider enforceability and confidentiality aspects when choosing between arbitration and litigation. Privacy concerns and the need for NDAs should be addressed early on with the engagement of an experienced lawyer. Payments should be made upon completion of build milestones, with independent surveyor signoff, and account for material costs, transport, and exchange rates. Security measures should be in place to protect against builder insolvency, including ownership transfer and guarantees from the builder's bank. Consider local legal requirements for ownership transfer and potential statutory liens by unpaid subcontractors. Clearly define the triggering events and duration of guarantees to ensure protection in case of builder insolvency or yacht issues. Establish clear and rigid procedures for change orders to avoid cost overruns and delays. Subcontractors should be carefully vetted, and the builder should remain liable for their mistakes. Materials should not be subject to title retention. Specify insurance requirements for the part-built project and ensure the wording is adequate and obtained from reputable insurers. Address force majeure events, their effect on the delivery date, and the need for a cap. Clarify buyer-ordered modifications' impact on delays. An immediate concern usually not covered is privacy, which may, of course, be one of the reasons you’re looking to have a yacht built in the first place. An experienced lawyer must be engaged at the outset – not brought in at the last minute to cast an eye over what everyone else considers to be a done deal. And his or her priority will be to get NDAs in place with the builder. SPECIFICATION & COST There’s no point finding designers who pen the perfect yacht, which the builder then interprets in its own (possibly cost-cutting) way. Moreover, modifying a yacht retrospectively can be particularly time-consuming and expensive. An incorrectly interpreted specification might prevent a yacht being chartered out . So the design and specification, in compliance with specific Flag State regulations and classification society Rules (if applicable) must be set out in exquisite detail, and agreed – in principle – with the builder, along with the build cost. With this settled, attention can be turned to the principal elements of the build agreement. PAYMENTS It’s customary for payments to be made upon the completion of certain build milestones. This way, your exposure is minimised while the builder has sufficient cashflow. Whether or not a stage has been satisfactorily completed is a technical question, needing signoff from an independent surveyor instructed by you – not the builder. The first payment is made by way of a deposit before construction starts. With large projects taking years to complete, account should be made for fluctuations in materials costs and transport, and exchange rates. Placing the builder under real financial strain will be to no one’s advantage. SECURITY Consideration must be given to the consequence of the builder folding mid-build. It happens. Without agreement otherwise, the builder would be left with both instalments and an incomplete yacht as assets, with you standing at the end of a long line of creditors. So your security takes two forms. Firstly, ownership of the yacht is transferred to the buyer as it is built. Secondly, the builder supplies the buyer with guarantees, issued by the builder’s bank, for the refund of pre-delivery instalments, against which the buyer pays each such instalment. Such guarantee can also take the form of an insurance-backed Advance Payment Bond (remembering that banks can, on occasion, themselves go bust). Keep in mind that any transfer of ownership may be subject to formalities under local law – regardless of the build agreement’s law and jurisdiction – so it’s important to take local legal advice. If the worst does happen, in spite of all the financial due diligence you undertook, then you will still need to have the project moved elsewhere for completion, so check that, under local law, unpaid subcontractors aren’t automatically entitled to a statutory lien over the yacht and materials, which may prevent removal. It is vital to state in the contract that only ownership, and not risk (which may otherwise also automatically be transferred at the same time), is being transferred. If the yacht is being financed, it may also be possible to register a mortgage over the incomplete project in favour of the lender. As to the specific small print of the guarantee, the most important element is what triggers the ability of the buyer to make a demand for payment under it. The most favourable option is for the buyer to have the ability to make a demand by stating that there has been a default on the part of the builder, under the terms of the build agreement, which therefore merits payment. The builder or bank may wish instead to expressly state the particular events which could lead to payment. By far the most important triggering event which must be described in the guarantee is the builder’s insolvency. It will not be good enough, for example, for the guarantee to become payable only when a receiver has been appointed, or any dispute between buyer and builder is settled, as these may take many months or even years in some jurisdictions. Far better for the guarantee to become payable as soon as it can be shown that the builder is in financial difficulties. Moreover, the procedure for presenting the bank with a demand for payment should be simple and straightforward. And there’s no point in having a guarantee which offers high protection, but which expires too soon. Where a guarantor will only pay after the matter has been litigated (in the absence of settlement) the guarantee must last for a period of years to take account of lethargic court processes. A number of owners have, in the past, enjoyed using their own business acumen to diagnose mismanagement and their own capital to save it. But this takes time and may not lead to a solution. Moreover, if the builder survives until completion of the yacht, there may still be issues with the delivered yacht for which the buyer wants significant compensation, and may still need the protection of the guarantee. If it expires immediately upon delivery and sea trial, for example, then there will be virtually no time in which to decide whether or not demand payment, and calculate the appropriate figure. CHANGE ORDERS It may well be that it’s only when you see your yacht start to take shape that realise that the layout or specification could be improved. While there’s a temptation to discuss modifications orally – for convenience – cost overruns and disproportionate delays may result. Modification procedures must be clear, and rigidly adhered to. As large numbers of changes may also start to affect the builder’s other projects, the builder may want terms in the contract to the effect that such modifications will only take effect if the builder agrees to the proposed adjustment to the contractual price and delivery date. The builder may also want to reserve a right of refusal if other projects would be affected. Additional payments may also be required. Clearly, the builder could be put in an overly dominant position if such a clause was not well drafted. In the case of very large projects taking many years, you may also want to leave gaps in the specification to allow for last-minute choices of high-tech equipment. SUBCONTRACTORS It’s common to subcontract significant elements of the builds, but you must make sure that only approved third parties can be brought in. If there’s any doubt, ask your project manager to visit the subcontractors and their previous projects to assess quality. To avoid confusion, the builder should still be expressly liable for any of its suppliers' or subcontractors' mistakes. Further, the builder must be obliged to pay suppliers promptly, and the materials provided must not be allowed to be subject to any form of title retention – to prevent anything being reclaimed later. DAMAGE While the builder should be obliged to insure the part-built project, the quality and wording of that insurance must also be clearly specified if it’s to be worth more than the paper it’s written on. The Institute Clauses for Builders’ Risks policy wording is adequate, and security obtained on the Lloyd’s of London insurance market (or equivalent) should be insisted upon. The builder and buyer should be named as joint assured, with any claims payable to the builder and buyer as a reflection of their interests at the time of the claim. There will also be other matters to be considered in the event of the project being damaged. You should have the option of either cancelling the contract and being refunded payments made up to that point, or requiring the builder to use its insurance pay-out to carry on with the build, in spite of the enormous delays involved. Where the damage causes the project to be scrapped rather than just delayed, builders will normally be reluctant to agree to compensate buyers for the loss of their slot, and for any premium a speculative buyer hoped to make on the build. It is still open to buyers to seek separate insurance for this loss. A new delivery schedule will need to be agreed. FORCE MAJEURE Events beyond the control of the builder are known as ‘force majeure’ events. These may or may not be defined by law. Where they are not, the parties need to ensure that all possibilities are covered, and what their effect will be. Typically, the contractual delivery date will be extended, but the parties will need to clarify whether this is by reference to the number of days the force majeure event continued or the effect on the project’s critical path. Even where delay is caused by a force majeure, such latitude should be subject to a cap – so that the point where enough is enough is clear. The exception to this will be delays due to modifications ordered by the buyer. DELIVERY Sorting matters out with a builder after the final instalment has been paid can be especially difficult. It is crucial that all the correct documents relating to legal title are presented before payment is made. Otherwise the new yacht cannot be registered and will not be allowed to sail anywhere. The place of legal delivery may also have tax implications, and must be agreed. At the point of delivery, the yacht should not only function and appear as envisaged, but it should meet all the classification society and Flag State regulations, especially if it is going to be chartered. Build agreements should allow not only access to the builder for the buyer’s representative, but reasonable tests and inspections, including those to be undertaken at subcontractors’ and suppliers’ premises. The representative should be allowed to require the builder to rectify evident faults immediately. TESTING The newly completed yacht will have to be formally tested, at sea, to make sure that the performance matches the specification. This is the buyer’s opportunity to determine whether the yacht has been built in conformity with the agreed contractual specifications and meets the contractual performance criteria. The owner’s representative, Class and Flag State surveyors will attend these trials and sign off the individual test protocols. As no two yachts are ever identical, their performance in terms of displacement, speed, noise levels, vibration and range, are difficult to predict even whilst using the latest computer-aided design techniques, FEA (finite element analysis), CFD (computational fluid dynamics), tank testing and wind tunnel testing. A practical solution is to agree a small margin of tolerance followed by incremental compensation which the builder must pay if the performance criteria aren’t met but still fall within certain limits. This incremental approach can only be applied to a certain extent and thereafter the right of rejection must lie with the buyer. REJECTION Ultimately, if faults are not put right, the buyer must have the right to refuse delivery. So the build agreement must make it crystal clear whether a particular requirement is to have the legal status of a condition, entitling the buyer to refuse delivery – especially as small defects are simply inevitable in any large project. The laws of most jurisdictions are vague on such matters, involving considerations of whether the yacht is of ‘satisfactory quality’ and ‘reasonably fit’ for purpose, and therefore in a ‘deliverable’ condition. This problem is made much worse by the critical importance of aesthetic elements. The standard contractual term for the small and inevitable defects is a ‘minor non-conformity’. Usually, the buyer will be forced to accept delivery with the minor non-conformity list outstanding, under the proviso that the list is taken care of by the builder as soon as possible. WARRANTY Not all of your new yacht’s inevitable little faults will come to light during the trails. Only over time will all the equipment and systems be used in varying weather conditions. The builder should guarantee materials and workmanship for a period of warranty – at least a year – after delivery. Builders will usually agree to correct defects during this period, but not to compensate. The builder may demand that otherwise pre-existing legal rights are given up, and that once the warranty period has expired no further responsibility will rest with the builder. The builder may not wish to compensate for loss of use and charter income, and a detailed notification procedure may also have to be complied with. Such demands should be considered carefully. Where significant concessions are granted by the buyer, the contract should ideally provide for the last payment instalment to be withheld until the end of the warranty period. It may be necessary to bring the yacht into dry-dock, so the buyer must be entitled to have work carried out by a yard other than that in which she was built if cruising schedules are not going to be spoiled.. DISPUTES Disputes between the buyer and builder are most likely to be technical in nature. Even the lustre of paint, for example, can be objectively measured. As courts are better at deciding points of law rather than fact, it makes sense to decide which points would be better decided by an independent expert. A representative from the classification society, for example, is typically agreed on to decide points upon which the society has created technical rules, but the use of another mutually agreed third-party expert should also be agreed for other matters. The expert should be asked to provide an independent opinion, and not act as arbitrator. Arbitrators can decide upon matters of law and evidence, and this requires the expertise of an experienced legal expert. Matters which are non-technical, or which involve large sums, should be agreed to be arbitrated according to the rules of an established arbitrators’ association, or referred to court. The choice of arbitration or litigation may depend on the enforceability or otherwise of an arbitrator’s decision, compared with a court judgment, in the home states of the parties involved. Sometimes, an arbitrators’ decision will be the more powerful of the two, and – unlike court proceedings – arbitrations are confidential in nature. To include long-term flexibility, and an acceptance that some flaws will be evident in the finished product, into a cast-iron contract, is no easy task. Time spent discussing and agreeing on this at the start will be a sound investment compared with the potential arguments which bubble-up later on. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about The Build Process Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about The Build Process

There are two basic types of charter: those where the crew is provided by the owner and those where it is up to the charterer to provide the crew (known as ‘bareboat’ charters). Because of the complex crew certification requirements, larger yachts are rarely bareboat chartered although they may be the subject of such a charter as part of a complex finance and/or tax avoidance scheme. Home Handbook Chartering Out / / How to Charter Out 6 February 2011 Last revised minutes 5 Reading time There are two basic types of charter: those where the crew is provided by the owner and those where it is up to the charterer to provide the crew (known as ‘bareboat’ charters). Because of the complex crew certification requirements, larger yachts are rarely bareboat chartered although they may be the subject of such a charter as part of a complex finance and/or tax avoidance scheme. minutes 5 Reading time 6 February 2011 Last revised There are two basic types of charter: those where the crew is provided by the owner and those where it is up to the charterer to provide the crew (known as ‘bareboat’ charters). Because of the complex crew certification requirements, larger yachts are rarely bareboat chartered although they may be the subject of such a charter as part of a complex finance and/or tax avoidance scheme. Bareboat charters make the charterer responsible for crew actions and liabilities. Implied terms include yacht seaworthiness and compliance with descriptions. Yacht age doesn't excuse outdated safety and navigational equipment. Breach of charter terms may lead to charter termination or damages. Charterers can give instructions on the yacht's destination but not on seamanship matters. Charter rates may include additional expenses; attention to terms is important. Insurance is required for liabilities caused by the charterer; compliance with policies is crucial. Redelivery of the yacht must be prompt to avoid additional charges. Captains may have authority to make contracts on behalf of the owner. Owners should consider national and regional laws before placing a yacht on the charter market. Charter rates may include additional expenses; attention to terms is important. Insurance is required for liabilities caused by the charterer; compliance with policies is crucial. Redelivery of the yacht must be prompt to avoid additional charges. Captains may have authority to make contracts on behalf of the owner. Owners should consider national and regional laws before placing a yacht on the charter market. Bareboat charters make the charterer responsible for crew actions and liabilities. Implied terms include yacht seaworthiness and compliance with descriptions. Yacht age doesn't excuse outdated safety and navigational equipment. Breach of charter terms may lead to charter termination or damages. Charterers can give instructions on the yacht's destination but not on seamanship matters. Whether or not crew is provided makes a real difference to the legal positions of the parties. Generally, with bareboat charters, the charterer remains responsible as if he or she was the owner: since the crew are employees of the charterer and not of the owner, the acts and omissions of the crew are the responsibility of the charterer and not the owner, should the yacht, for example, be involved in a collision. Bareboat charterers can take comfort in the fact that the Limitation Conventions of 1957 and 1976 allow charterers to limit their liability for loss of life or personal injury to any person carried on board, loss of or damage to property, liabilities for dealing with a wrecked or abandoned yacht, and the infringement of any other non-contractual rights. IMPLIED TERMS Whatever the type of charter, the law will automatically imply further terms. These include conditions that the yacht is seaworthy and that she corresponds with the description given by or on behalf of her owner. Seaworthiness is taken to mean that the yacht, her equipment and crew (if any) must be able to cope with any foreseeable dangers. More specifically, in order to be seaworthy, the yacht must be as fit as an ordinary, careful owner would require at the start of any passage, taking into account all the likely circumstances of that passage. The age of the yacht is relevant, but age does not excuse having out-of-date safety and navigational equipment. All legal documents required must be held on board. The charter agreement may oblige the owner to maintain the yacht in a seaworthy condition for the whole duration of the charter rather than just the start. BREACH OF CHARTER Generally, a breach of any terms may allow the charterer to treat the charter as having come to an end immediately and claim damages, or just claim damages afterwards, depending on how serious the breach is, but the charterer must have suffered some sort of loss as a result of the breach. Just because the yacht is unseaworthy, for example, does not mean that the charterer can claim damages. The particular seaworthiness must have caused loss on the part of the charterer. This would certainly be the case, for example, if the yacht was detained because she did not have the correct papers on board. Moreover, the courts will, as a matter of law, overlook breaches that are so trivial as to be negligible. What is trivial, however, depends entirely on the facts. CHARTERERS’ INSTRUCTIONS Subject to the charter agreement (known by lawyers as a ‘charter party’) the yacht is the charterer’s to do with as he or she pleases. Accordingly, the charterer is entitled to give, and the captain is obliged to comply with, legitimate instructions as to where the charterer wishes the yacht to go. This also means that should the yacht be saved from misfortune, the charterer could be liable to pay the rescuers for their services. Unless a route proposed by the charterer will be inherently dangerous, the captain is bound to comply with the charterer’s request and must then use his navigational skills to avoid danger should it be encountered. Yet the charterer is not entitled to direct the captain on any matters of seamanship. In fact, the captain is not only entitled but also obliged to retain responsibility for all matters relating to the seaworthiness, navigation and the general safety of the vessel, and must refuse requests that might compromise these. A captain is also obliged to refuse to comply with instructions that are illegal under the laws governing the charter agreement. LITTLE EXTRAS While there is much else for the charterer to pay for aside from the hire, such other expenses are usually lumped in with the hire payment to produce the charter rate or fee. The charterer needs to pay close attention to the charter terms to avoid any unexpected bills, however. Quoted charter rates are normally inclusive of the brokers’ fees, but the charterer would be well advised to confirm this. MYBA AGREEMENT The most common terms are those published by MYBA (formerly the Mediterranean Yacht Brokers Association), which have also been adopted by the American Yacht Charter Association. On these terms, the operating costs of the yacht are in addition to the hire. The charterer must pay a self-explanatory Advance Provisioning Allowance, which must be topped up as required, although the captain is required to keep an eye on this expenditure. The charterer should be familiar with other key parts of the MYBA contract. DELAYS For various reasons beyond the owner’s reasonable control, the yacht may be delivered late to the charterer. The owner has 48 hours, or one tenth of the charter period – whichever is the shorter – in which to deliver the yacht for charter, with a proportionate refund being given, or the charterer may cancel the charter, but will only be entitled to a full refund. If the owner fails to deliver the yacht to the charterer, and the reason for this failure was within the owner’s reasonable control, then the charterer will be entitled to a full refund, plus an extra 50 per cent. The charterer may not, however, claim more, no matter how much inconvenience was caused. Should the owner choose to cancel before the start of the charter, the charterer will still only be entitled to a full refund plus 50 per cent. A chartering area is agreed, and the charterer is allowed to cruise for up to six hours per day within that area. Should the yacht break down or become disabled for any other reason, for any length of time over 48 consecutive hours or 10 per cent of the charter period – whichever is the shorter – the charterer has the option to terminate the agreement. INSURANCE Insurance is required against liabilities to third parties that may be caused by the charterer. In as much as the cover required is no less than that set out in the Institute Yacht Clauses in use in the London insurance market, owners may well wish to use these terms rather than any foreign alternatives to save future argument over what is or is not cover of such a standard. The charterer will still be liable, however, should the yacht or any crewmember be detained as a result of any illegal activity on the part of the charterer or any of his or her guests. The insurance policies for larger risks can be written in long-winded terms. In the event of a dispute arising between owner and insurer, unfamiliar terms can lead to doubt. While an owner who keeps the yacht for his or her own use may be given the benefit of any doubt as a consumer, where a yacht is chartered, this protection evaporates. The additional clause inserted by the insurer to allow the yacht to be chartered will usually take the form of a ‘warranty’ added to the policy, requiring the yacht to be skippered by a professional yacht captain. Being a warranty, if this is not abided by, the policy will be ineffective in its entirety. In the case of bareboat charters, the qualifications needed to be held by skipper-charterers will be set out in detail and, again, must be complied with to the letter. REDELIVERY Under the MYBA terms, the charterer should make sure that the yacht is redelivered back to the owner promptly, otherwise the charterer will be liable to pay the charter rate plus an extra 50 per cent, plus the owner’s resulting losses. There is also no agreed limit as to the amount that can be reclaimed should the charterer choose to cancel the contract. AUTHORITY A captain will often be given the authority to make contracts as the owner’s agent, as long as he or she is acting within his or her given authority. Where the yacht has been chartered and the charter agreement states that certain supplies, for example, are to be paid by the charterer, the owner will be liable to pay if the charterer doesn’t, even if the creditor knows of the existence of the charter agreement. POINTS TO CONSIDER Before a yacht is even placed on the charter market, there are a number of points owners should consider. Depending on the waters in which the yacht will be chartered, such activities will be affected by national laws and increasingly by capricious regional laws, especially in the Mediterranean. This may affect the number of guests allowed, safety requirements and the flag the yacht must sail under. Many flag states, in particular within the Red Ensign group, also have technical Codes of Practice applicable to chartered yachts, which can be expensive to comply with. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Difficult Guests Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Difficult Guests

When yacht insurance underwriters ask questions, you, the owner, must respond to as accurately as possible. But there is also a positive duty on insured to speak up about matters which may affect the risk. It’s important not only to understand the nature and extent of that duty if you’re yacht is to stay covered, but also to ensure that your broker isn’t a weak link in the chain. Home Handbook Insuring / / Providing Information 15 April 2023 Last revised minutes 4 Reading time When underwriters ask questions, you, the owner, must respond as accurately as possible. But there is also a positive duty on you, as insured, to speak up about matters which may affect the risk. It’s important not only to understand the nature and extent of that duty if you’re yacht is to stay covered, but also to ensure that your broker isn’t a weak link in the chain. minutes 4 Reading time 15 April 2023 Last revised When underwriters ask questions, you, the owner, must respond as accurately as possible. But there is also a positive duty on you, as insured, to speak up about matters which may affect the risk. It’s important not only to understand the nature and extent of that duty if you’re yacht is to stay covered, but also to ensure that your broker isn’t a weak link in the chain. Insurance contracts are based on the principle of the utmost good faith, requiring parties to provide honest and complete information. Underwriters may not have detailed knowledge of each specific risk, so insured individuals have a duty to disclose material information. A fair presentation of the risk includes disclosing all material circumstances or providing sufficient information to prompt further inquiries by a prudent insurer. Disclosure should be clear and accessible to the insurer, and statements must be made in good faith. Material circumstances are those that would influence a prudent insurer's judgment in determining whether to accept the risk and on what terms. The insured's knowledge refers to the company's senior management, including captains, departmental heads, and insurance brokers. Claims history, crewing arrangements, and yacht valuations are among the practical matters that need to be disclosed. Yacht valuations can be contentious, and a specific reference to the agreed value should be included in policies. Breaching the duty of fair presentation can lead to remedies for the underwriter if it directly influenced their decision to enter the contract. Consequences for breaching the duty of fair presentation vary based on intent, ranging from no liability with no premium return to reduced claim payment or returned premiums. The insured's knowledge refers to the company's senior management, including captains, departmental heads, and insurance brokers. Claims history, crewing arrangements, and yacht valuations are among the practical matters that need to be disclosed. Yacht valuations can be contentious, and a specific reference to the agreed value should be included in policies. Breaching the duty of fair presentation can lead to remedies for the underwriter if it directly influenced their decision to enter the contract. Consequences for breaching the duty of fair presentation vary based on intent, ranging from no liability with no premium return to reduced claim payment or returned premiums. Insurance contracts are based on the principle of the utmost good faith, requiring parties to provide honest and complete information. Underwriters may not have detailed knowledge of each specific risk, so insured individuals have a duty to disclose material information. A fair presentation of the risk includes disclosing all material circumstances or providing sufficient information to prompt further inquiries by a prudent insurer. Disclosure should be clear and accessible to the insurer, and statements must be made in good faith. Material circumstances are those that would influence a prudent insurer's judgment in determining whether to accept the risk and on what terms. No two insurance risks will ever be identical. Underwriters will know about yachts in general, but they cannot be expected to know the ins and outs of your particular vessel, which will be, to a greater or lesser extent, unique, and crewed, managed and operated in a distinctive way. So while most contracts work on the basis of buyer beware – with parties doing their own homework – insurance works on the opposite basis: there’s a positive duty to provide honest information. They are said to be contracts of ‘utmost good faith’. This is manifested in the insurer, in the case of yachts owned by companies (which cannot, by definition, be considered as consumers) being under a duty to make a ‘fair presentation’ of the risk. This duty obliges the insured to disclose material circumstances that it knows (or ought to know) or put a prudent underwriter on notice that it needs to make further enquiries. FAIR PRESENTATION A fair presentation is one where the insured discloses every ‘material circumstance’ which the insured knows or ought to know, or, failing that, gives sufficient information to put a (hypothetical) ‘prudent insurer’ on notice that it needs to make further enquiries for the purpose of revealing those material circumstances. Disclosure must be made in a manner which would be reasonably clear and accessible to that hypothetical prudent insurer. Facts must ‘substantially correct’ and statements of expectation or belief must be made in good faith. A circumstance will be material if it ‘would influence the judgement of a prudent insurer in determining whether to take the risk and, if so, on what terms’. This includes special or unusual facts relating to the risk, particular concerns which led the insured to look for cover, and anything which those specialising in yachting-related risks would generally understand as being something that should be included in a fair presentation of risk. Note that we are concerned with the judgement of a prudent insurer: the opinions of the actual underwriter concerned are irrelevant. The insured’s knowledge, in the case of an owning company, is taken to mean the company’s ‘senior management’, which will include captains and departmental heads, plus those making decisions about insurance (including insurance brokers or other intermediaries acting on the owner’s behalf – whether regulated or not – such as a yacht broker). A ‘reasonable search’ for relevant information must be made – including with third parties. This might include, for example, making inquires with classification societies. PRACTICAL MATTERS The claims history of both the legal and beneficial owner will almost certainly be material – even if the proposal form simply asks in respect of the ‘insured’s claims record. If you, as beneficial owner, have criminal convictions in respect of dishonesty then this should be disclosed. While it may be obvious whether or not a yacht requires crew, the nature and extent of crewing arrangements will need to be provided in detail. The captain’s CV/résumé may be requested. You should ask a third party services provider to verify the crewmember’s qualifications and stated experience. If a survey is needed, check whether that surveyor must have been approved by the underwriter and/or hold certain qualifications. VALUATIONS Yacht valuations can, and have, been a source of contention over the years. Policies can be unvalued but given the obvious room for disagreement, nearly all on the basis of a valuation agreed at the outset. There should be a specific reference to the value being agreed – not merely to a ‘sum insured’ or similar. Unless fraud can be proved, the fixed value is usually conclusive. Problems arise where owners pay over the odds at the outset, or where renewals haven’t taken account of depreciation, so that the resulting over-valuation risks being deemed to be a material misrepresentation. This will be the conclusion where the owner has no genuine belief that the value given was a true valuation. It would be wise to obtain an independent valuation, but – being subjective – this shouldn’t be treated as conclusive. CONSEQUENCES If the insured breaches the duty of fair presentation, the underwriter is entitled to a remedy only if it can demonstrate that the breach directly influenced its decision to enter into the insurance contract, or at all. To prove this influence, the underwriter must establish that, without the breach, it would not have entered into the contract or, at least, would have done so on different terms, such as a higher premium. If the breach of the duty of fair presentation was made deliberately or recklessly, the underwriter can walk away from liability entirely – not even pausing to return premiums paid. If the breach was neither deliberate nor reckless, and the underwriter would not have provided cover on any terms, then payment of claims can be refused but premiums paid must be returned. If the underwriter would have just charged a higher premium, then the amount payable on a claim may be reduced proportionately. CONSUMERS In the unlikely ( and unwise ) event that own your yacht personally, and it’s not chartered out or otherwise used for business purposes, then your position, as a consumer, is different to that set out above. It’s then up to underwriters to ask the questions and determine the risk. The insured simply has to exercise reasonable care not to make a misrepresentation when answering questions. There’s no obligation to volunteer information. TIPS & TRICKS Be sure that the insurance broker earns its commission and tells you everything you need to disclose. It is quite possible that your broker advises you poorly, and, as a result, you fail in your duty of fair presentation. In which case, the broker will be liable. Consider where the broker is based and how it is regulated. Obtaining the requisite information takes time, so plan ahead – including when it’s time to renew. Do not assume that the underwriter already has sufficient information: disclose all material information, even if it’s obvious. Be sure to respond fully to all questions raised. Avoid data dumping, and make sure that information is indexed, categorised or otherwise easily navigable. Keep an audit trail of the searches carried out and the enquiries made, to prove that you have conducted a reasonable search. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Staying Covered Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Staying Covered

It’s important to understand the yacht insurance claims process, in advance of an incident, to make sure that underwriters have no excuses when it comes to the crunch. If you’re an owner reading this because your yacht has just been involved in an incident, then you should contact us right away to make sure that you’re taking the appropriate advice. Home Handbook Insuring / / Making A Claim 18 May 2023 Last revised minutes 4 Reading time It’s important to understand the claims process, in advance of an incident, to make sure that underwriters have no excuses when it comes to the crunch. If you’re an owner reading this because your yacht has just been involved in an incident, then you should contact us right away to make sure that you’re taking the appropriate advice. minutes 4 Reading time 18 May 2023 Last revised It’s important to understand the claims process, in advance of an incident, to make sure that underwriters have no excuses when it comes to the crunch. If you’re an owner reading this because your yacht has just been involved in an incident, then you should contact us right away to make sure that you’re taking the appropriate advice. You must notify the underwriter, through your broker if your're using one, of a loss - and provide evidence within a specified time frame or (if none) a reasonable period. You should take reasonable steps to minimize the loss in the event of an incident. You are responsible for proving the amount and scope of the loss and that it was caused by a covered peril. Both you and the underwriter have obligations of cooperation during the claims process. Underwriters must pay valid claims within a reasonable timeframe, and delays may result in additional damages payable to you. Subrogation allows the underwriter to recover money paid to the insured from the third party responsible for the loss. Settlements reached with the underwriter can be invalidated if fraudulent misrepresentation by the insured is later discovered. Double insurance can occur when both the yacht and its tender are insured separately, requiring coordination between insurers. Independent advice may be necessary, as your interests anf those of the underwriter are not aligned. You must not jeopardize the underwriter's subrogation rights by settling or abandoning a claim against a third party. Subrogation allows the underwriter to recover money paid to the insured from the third party responsible for the loss. Settlements reached with the underwriter can be invalidated if fraudulent misrepresentation by the insured is later discovered. Double insurance can occur when both the yacht and its tender are insured separately, requiring coordination between insurers. Independent advice may be necessary, as your interests anf those of the underwriter are not aligned. You must not jeopardize the underwriter's subrogation rights by settling or abandoning a claim against a third party. You must notify the underwriter, through your broker if your're using one, of a loss - and provide evidence within a specified time frame or (if none) a reasonable period. You should take reasonable steps to minimize the loss in the event of an incident. You are responsible for proving the amount and scope of the loss and that it was caused by a covered peril. Both you and the underwriter have obligations of cooperation during the claims process. Underwriters must pay valid claims within a reasonable timeframe, and delays may result in additional damages payable to you. In order to receive payment or obtain the benefit(s) specified in the contract, the insured must inform the underwriter that it has experienced a loss that it believes is covered by the contract, and provide evidence demonstrating that their claim is indeed covered by the contract. A specific claims procedure may be set out in the contract. Written notice may be required – which may need to be in a particular form. Notice must be given within any specified time frame, or otherwise within a reasonable period. If the notice provision is considered a condition precedent, the underwriter may be able to deny liability. CAUSATION The insured is normally responsible for proving, on a balance of probabilities: The amount and scope of their loss; and That their loss was ‘proximately caused’ by a peril covered by the policy, unless the policy states that the loss may be ‘directly or indirectly’ caused by such a peril (or similar). Quite often, losses involve a chain of events, one or more of which are excluded from coverage. Generally, if there are two proximate causes of loss, one covered and one not covered, the underwriter will be on the hook for that loss. But if the insured cannot establish which peril (covered or not covered) caused the loss, or if none of the causes appear inherently likely, there will be no coverage. DUTY TO CO-OPERATE The insurance contract normally obligations of cooperation for both the insured and the underwriter when a claim is filed. In the case of a liability policy, the underwriter is generally required to negotiate with third party claimants in good faith, taking into account the insured's best interests – and, if necessary, assume responsibility for defending against a third party claim. The insured, meanwhile, must not admit liability without the underwriter's consent – and must obtain the underwriter's approval before settling a third party claim. PAYING CLAIMS Underwriters must pay valid claims within a ‘reasonable’ timeframe. If there is a delay or failure to pay, the insured can sue for damages for any additional losses suffered. It’s up to the insured to establish that the payment was only made after an unreasonable delay. Where the underwriter has reasonable grounds to dispute the claim, the manner in which it handles the claim can be a relevant factor in determining whether the implied term of timely payment was breached. SUBROGATION When an underwriter pays out money to an insured under an indemnity policy, such as Hull & Machinery , the rules of ‘subrogation’ allow the underwriter to recover all or part of that money from the third party who caused the loss. Subrogation means that the underwriter can step into the insured's shoes and pursue the third party itself, seeking to recover what it’s just paid out. The underwriter can not only claim the rights of the insured but also any benefits awarded by a court, such as interest on judgment debts and costs. The right of subrogation can be explicitly stated in the insurance contract, but it is also a pre-existing legal right. As set out above, it is essential for the insured not to jeopardize the underwriter's subrogation rights by settling or abandoning the claim against the third party, as this could lead to the underwriter seeking damages from the insured. FRAUDULENT CLAIMS Underwriters are always alive to the possibility of fraud. They’re seen it all before. Even where a settlement has been reached between underwriter and insured, this can be invalidated where it’s later shown that there was a fraudulent misrepresentation by the insured. Underwriters have the option to terminate the insurance contract from the date of the fraudulent act - without refunding any premiums. This means that the underwriter can refuse liability for genuine losses or claims made after the fraudulent act. Claims made before the fraudulent act will be unaffected. DOUBLE INSURANCE Recent years have seen a rise the use of support yachts, carrying large tenders and helicopters. If close attention isn’t paid to the policies of both yacht and tender (itself often a large motor yacht), it is possible to end up in a situation where the tender is ‘double insured’. In the event of a loss, the insured generally has the freedom to choose under which policy to claim payment. However, this is subject to the terms and conditions of each insurance contract, and some policies may prevent the making of a claim if there is other insurance covering the same risk. Double insurance does not provide additional protection to the insured. Instead, it may complicate the claims process and require coordination between multiple insurers. If an underwriter pays out a claim under an insurance policy, it may have the right to seek a contribution from another underwriter that provided coverage for the same loss. CONCLUSION Should any incident ever arise, potentially involving damage to the yacht or liability to a third party, sitting back is not an option. The insured is usually under an express obligation to notify the underwriter, and do everything reasonable to minimise the loss. The advice of the underwriter or broker, at the initial stages of an incident, is therefore vital, but the interests of underwriter and insured not being one and the same, and it will be prudent for you to take independent advice, right away. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Who's Who Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Who's Who

Buying yacht insurance is an annual chore which you, as owner, no doubt leave to your manager or captain. Some larger managers have in-house insurance specialists, but it’s fair to say that it’s often an area that is little understood. Here, we look at the various parties involved and their respective roles. Home Handbook Insuring / / Who's Who 3 January 2023 Last revised minutes 5 Reading time Buying insurance is an annual chore which you, as owner, no doubt leave to your yacht manager or captain. Some larger managers have in-house insurance specialists, but it’s fair to say that it’s often an area that is little understood. Here, we look at the various parties involved and their respective roles. minutes 5 Reading time 3 January 2023 Last revised Buying insurance is an annual chore which you, as owner, no doubt leave to your yacht manager or captain. Some larger managers have in-house insurance specialists, but it’s fair to say that it’s often an area that is little understood. Here, we look at the various parties involved and their respective roles. Large yacht insurance is provided by underwriters: other parties are merely part of the distribution channel. Insurance brokers should act on behalf of the insured - not underwriters - but are paid commission by underwriters. Some intermediaries may mislead clients into believing they are brokers when they are actually agents of underwriters. Other intermediaries may act as brokers during policy inception but switch to being underwriters' claims handlers during claims, leaving owners without the guidance they had expected to receive. Repackaging existing P&I cover to appear as an add-on can mislead clients and inflate costs. Underwriters prioritize profitability and may challenge large claims, causing significant delays and losses to the insured. It is crucial to verify the location and regulation of underwriters to avoid being left without coverage if they become insolvent. Insurance brokers are tightly regulated to prevent conflicts of interest, ensuring they act in the client's best interests. Brokers have a duty to exercise reasonable skill and care, identify the needed insurance, disclose material facts, and obtain suitable cover underwritten by a reputable underwriter. Acting as an unregulated insurance intermediary in the UK is a serious criminal offence; you should check that they're registered with the FCA . Underwriters prioritize profitability and may challenge large claims, causing significant delays and losses to the insured. It is crucial to verify the location and regulation of underwriters to avoid being left without coverage if they become insolvent. Insurance brokers are tightly regulated to prevent conflicts of interest, ensuring they act in the client's best interests. Brokers have a duty to exercise reasonable skill and care, identify the needed insurance, disclose material facts, and obtain suitable cover underwritten by a reputable underwriter. Acting as an unregulated insurance intermediary in the UK is a serious criminal offence; you should check that they're registered with the FCA . Large yacht insurance is provided by underwriters: other parties are merely part of the distribution channel. Insurance brokers should act on behalf of the insured - not underwriters - but are paid commission by underwriters. Some intermediaries may mislead clients into believing they are brokers when they are actually agents of underwriters. Other intermediaries may act as brokers during policy inception but switch to being underwriters' claims handlers during claims, leaving owners without the guidance they had expected to receive. Repackaging existing P&I cover to appear as an add-on can mislead clients and inflate costs. Look for large yacht insurance, and you’ll find all kinds of parties offering it. In fact, it’s only underwriters who provide cover. Everyone else is part of the distribution channel. The term ‘underwriter’ stems from the days when well-heeled individuals, happy to leverage their wealth as collateral, would sign underneath a description of the risk being insured. With some exceptions, you can’t buy cover from underwriters. They use agents to reach the market. Insurance brokers, by contrast, provide a service to those looking for insurance. Brokers act (or should be – they don’t always) in the insured’s interests, even though they are paid commission from underwriters. MARKET PRACTICES One particularly obnoxious practice is to infer that cover is being bought from a broker, whereas, in fact, that party – standing behind a well-marketed brand – is an underwriter’s agent. Another business model to be wary of is that the turncoat, where the intermediary acts as broker at the time of policy inception, but then acts as the underwriter’s claims handler when there’s a claim. The (legal) basis for this is often buried in the small print, but it’s of little help for the owner who, when needing to claim, is left without the guidance which might have been expected. Another unhelpful practice is to divide up and repackage cover so as to appear to add value. For example, third party liability insurance typically covers injury claims from guests – but this doesn’t prevent some from selling guest welfare insurance separately as an add-on. Relative to Hull & Machinery, P&I cover is relatively inexpensive and normally already provides owners with mandatory international cover. And – make no mistake – underwriters are there to turn a profit. They can, and will, challenge large claims, to a final and unappealable conclusion if necessary, in a legal process that can take years, with the insured incurring unrecoverable losses no matter the outcome. One trick is to pay smaller claims quickly and make a song-and-dance of doing so in their marketing materials, public relations and social media, giving the impression that all claims are handled in this way. THE UNDERWRITER Check carefully where the underwriter is based, and who’s regulating them. Should an underwriter become insolvent following a large claim, the owner would almost certainly be left high and dry. For this reason, underwriters based in the United Kingdom and European Union must maintain ‘solvency margins’, to ensure that their assets will cover their potential liabilities. Reinsurance provides further protection. Further afield, however, policyholders should consider just how much of a hit their underwriter could take. Given the expense of holding reserves, and with reinsurance typically accounting for a fair percentage of the premium, some underwriters could be tempted to cut corners. THE BROKER Given that they are paid on a commission basis, inherent potential conflicts of interest are tightly regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). In particular, brokers must act honestly, fairly and in their clients' best interests – and communicate clearly, especially regarding fees and commission. Advice provided must be appropriate for the client and only suitable insurance, and level of cover, must be proposed. GENERAL DUTIES As well as regulatory duties, the law more generally requires brokers to exercise reasonable skill and care (with reference to what one would ordinarily expect from a member of that profession operating within the same market) – plus, there may be a specific contractual duty to source insurance of particular type or standard. OBTAINING COVER Brokers who hold themselves out as dealing or specialising in yacht insurance will owe the insured a duty of care to identify what insurance is needed. While not lawyers, they are expected to have a working knowledge of insurance law, be able to ask their client the right questions, and understand how any exclusion clauses may affect cover. They are under a duty of care to warn the insured of the duty to make a fair presentation to the underwriter, and the separate requirement to disclose material facts. Brokers should also indicate what sort of matters could be considered to be material and ask questions about facts that they know are material but the insured might not think to mention. They must also, when it comes to renewal, go through the same procedure that was carried out at the inception of the policy: they cannot just renew the policy and pick up their commission. While brokers must do everything reasonably possible in order to obtain or renew cover, there is no absolute obligation to do so. Brokers must act with reasonable speed, and obtain multiple quotes, if possible, to make certain that the insured pays no more than necessary. The cover which is obtained must be clear, suitable and meet the insured’s requirements – and has been underwritten by a suitable underwriter(s). ADVISING ON TERMS Crucially for owners of large, permanently-crewed yachts, which are subject to a myriad of regulations, brokers must draw their clients’ attention to any onerous or unusual terms or conditions, so that owners have the opportunity to ensure that they are able to comply with such requirements or, if possible, obtain alternative cover. CLAIMS HANDLING Generally, unless agreed otherwise, brokers must assist clients with making claims. As ever, the broker must act with due skill, care and diligence. Notably (these are issues commonly leading to disputes) the broker must ensure that time limits and notification requirements are complied with. Time limits can be very tight. Policies can also require, for example, a sworn proof of loss to be provided. A whole strategy must be in place for handling claims. OTHER INTERMEDIARIES Do not assume that non-specialist intermediaries such as yacht managers will add value. Some may simply extend chains of communication, increasing the risk of non-payment for non-disclosure of a material fact, while paying the manager’s commission will only increase premiums. Acting as an unregulated intermediary in the UK is a serious criminal offence, carrying a maximum two-year prison term and an unlimited fine for the individuals involved. You can quickly check whether anyone doing so is regulated by looking them up on the FCA's Financial Services Register . BE WARNED Always look beyond the slick websites, social media advertising and event sponsorships, and be clear about the role played about the party(ies) you’re dealing with. Seek written confirmation if you’re in any doubt. Also pay attention to where they’re located, who’s regulating them, and the law and jurisdiction applicable to the policy. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Types of Insurance Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Types of Insurance

Most large yachts are bought and sold on the basis of the MYBA MOA. While the mechanics of the sale process is dealt with in that document, there’s one glaring omission: what documents does the seller need to produce to prove ownership and liabilities? As mere paperwork, such matters are often only negotiated once the MOA has been agreed, leaving scope for an otherwise viable deal to falter. Consider what’s likely to be requested at the outset and prepare accordingly. Home Handbook Selling / / Preparing the Paperwork 29 January 2025 Last revised minutes 9 Reading time Most large yachts are bought and sold on the basis of the MYBA MOA . While the mechanics of the sale process is dealt with in that document, there’s one glaring omission: what documents does the seller need to produce to prove ownership and liabilities, and ensure a smooth transaction? As mere paperwork, such matters are often only negotiated once the MOA has been agreed, leaving scope for an otherwise viable deal to falter. Consider what’s likely to be requested at the outset and prepare accordingly. minutes 9 Reading time 29 January 2025 Last revised Most large yachts are bought and sold on the basis of the MYBA MOA . While the mechanics of the sale process is dealt with in that document, there’s one glaring omission: what documents does the seller need to produce to prove ownership and liabilities, and ensure a smooth transaction? As mere paperwork, such matters are often only negotiated once the MOA has been agreed, leaving scope for an otherwise viable deal to falter. Consider what’s likely to be requested at the outset and prepare accordingly. Clause 18 of the MOA requires "Addendum One" documents, but no such addendum is included. Essential documents are needed for re-registration and proving title, without which the vessel could lose value. Missing corporate authorities or powers of attorney could invalidate the sale. Documents may need specific authentication to be accepted by the flag state. Seller’s documents are crucial for proving ownership and regulatory compliance. Legal professionals have standard expectations for required documents, beyond outdated MYBA lists. Proper planning is needed before the MOA is agreed to ensure all documents are available. Sale documents fall into six categories, which are considered in detail below. Seller’s documents are crucial for proving ownership and regulatory compliance. Legal professionals have standard expectations for required documents, beyond outdated MYBA lists. Proper planning is needed before the MOA is agreed to ensure all documents are available. Sale documents fall into six categories, which are considered in detail below. Clause 18 of the MOA requires "Addendum One" documents, but no such addendum is included. Essential documents are needed for re-registration and proving title, without which the vessel could lose value. Missing corporate authorities or powers of attorney could invalidate the sale. Documents may need specific authentication to be accepted by the flag state. Unhelpfully, Clause 18 of the MOA simply sets out that the “Addendum One” documents must be provided by the seller, yet the MOA doesn’t come with Addendum One – or any addenda for that matter. Certain documents will be needed for re-registration and for proving title – without which the vessel may be worth less or even worthless. The sale itself could be invalidated where the correct corporate authorities and powers of attorney aren’t in place. And such documents may need to be authenticated in a particular way(s) in order to be accepted by the vessel’s new or existing flag state. The seller’s documents are so much more than mere paperwork: they help prove ownership, and are evidence that the vessel complies with certain regulations. They’re fundamental, not a formality. Most lawyers involved in yacht sale and purchase will have their own standard document setting out what they expect to see when representing the buyer. At some point, MYBA has produced it own rather meagre list, versions of which are still doing the rounds years later. It’s best to think about what’ll be asked for, and who has possession of these (or can provide them) even before the MOA is agreed. Assuming the vessel is owned through a company, the paperwork can be divided into six broad categories: Seller due diligence, proving that the company exists and has the capacity to own and sell the vessel; Beneficial owner due diligence, confirming identity and providing a personal guarantee; Seller corporate documents, resolving to sell and appointing attorneys; Asset due diligence, demonstrating provenance and conformity with safety regulations; Liability due diligence, showing that those would could have a claim against the vessel do not; and Sale process documents, which will show that the sale took place, when and where. Let’s look at each group in further detail. SELLER DUE DILIGENCE A Certificate of Incorporation , Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association , in respect of the selling company (including any amendments) are needed to verify that the seller is the legally-registered entity it appears to be, which actually has the authority to own and sell the asset. This may sound obvious, but companies can only do what they’re empowered to do. A recent Certificate of Incumbency , or equivalent certificate, is important in verifying the current shareholders and directors of the seller, as well as confirming that the seller is in good standing and no action is being taken against them. A Certificate of Good Standing , or equivalent certificate, is also needed from the seller's registry to certify that they are in good standing with that registry. These documents are necessary fundamental to ensuring that the buyer is not at risk of fraud. BENEFICIAL OWNER DUE DILIGENCE A Personal Guarantee & Indemnity , whether on standard MYBA terms or otherwise, from the yacht’s beneficial owner, goes a long way to providing additional security for the buyer in case the seller is unable to fulfil its obligations under the sale agreement. The seller, after all, is almost certainly an offshore company with no assets to claim against other than the vessel which has just been sold. The guarantee should make provision for private arbitration so that, in the event of a dispute, matters aren’t settled in the public eye. Up-to-date personal identity documents are also useful in making sure that whoever signs the guarantee is who they claim to be. It should be noted that not all beneficial owners are happy to provide these documents. Some take the view that all their assets are owned through companies with which they don’t want to have any involvement. If you don’t want to agree to provide these to the seller, that’s your prerogative. This may or may not be a deal-breaker for the buyer. SELLER CORPORATE DOCUMENTS As with any large transaction undertaken by a company, the seller needs to produce written Resolutions , signed by someone with the requisite authority, confirming ownership, approving the sale, and authorising representatives to act on behalf of the company in respect of the completion of the sale (such attending on board at completion, and signing the sale documents). For the sake of certainty, Powers of Attorney are also needed to give the individuals the powers which the company has resolved to given them. ASSET DUE DILIGENCE It doesn’t provide conclusive proof, but the Certificate of Registry does help to prove ownership. The Builder’s Certificate shows who the builder was (yard pedigree being an important component of value) as well as it’s specification (which is vital when establishing what regulations will apply and establishing whether it can be chartered). Providing all the previous Bills of Sale will establish a chain of ownership transferal, extending back to its launch, which helps to confirm current ownership, as well as being documents which a fraudster would struggle to produce. The yacht will be subject to various regulations and all the relevant safety and convention certificates must be obtained well in advance of the sale so that the buyer knows that the yacht is capable of satisfying these rules. LIABILITY DUE DILIGENCE Debts incurred by an owner, in respect of their yacht, can be enforced against that yacht (as well as that owner) even after it’s been sold to an unsuspecting buyer. So a recent Transcript of Register will show that the vessel is free from any registered liens or encumbrances and is still solely owned by the seller. It’s also important to obtain a Manager’s Letter (if a yacht manager has been engaged) and a Captain’s Letter , confirming that the seller has no liabilities to the manager, or captain, or any third parties, and that the yacht has not been involved in any incidents or accidents since the pre-sale condition survey. Crewmembers’ Letters will confirm that each crewmember has been paid everything owed to them. And where the yacht is being sold as having a tax-paid status, evidence of this must be prepared – allowing sufficient time for the buyer to take advice from a local tax specialist. SALE PROCESS DOCUMENTS A Completion Timetable , which lists all parties involved in the completion of the sale, their contact details, and the necessary steps to be taken during and after completion, is essential to ensure that all parties are aware of the steps required to complete the sale and that they are well-coordinated. The Bill of Sale , signed by the seller, declares that the vessel is free from all debts, claims, liens, and encumbrances and transfers ownership to the buyer. This document is necessary to establish transfer of ownership, and is vital for re-registration in the buyer’s name. As the time and location of the transfer of ownership may have tax implications, a Protocol of Delivery & Acceptance , in an agreed format, must be agreed. As a formal payment request, the seller’s Commercial Invoice is essential for bookkeeping and provides customs authorities with essential information regarding the transaction. Finally, the seller must produce a Letter of Undertaking that the yacht will be deleted from the current ship registry soon after the sale. Deletion isn’t free and involves professional time which the seller will have to pay for. Feel free to contact us for further guidance. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Document Authentication Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Document Authentication

The media is full of data about the carbon footprint of large yachts. This data is taken as gospel by campaign groups. After all, the journalists refer to published, peer-reviewed academic papers. And these are clever people, right? Well it appears not. Or least their political jaundice means that they’re not fussed about fact-checking. If we’re not careful, policy makers may regard such research as correct and unchallengeable. Home Handbook White Papers / / Damn Lies & Statistics Imagine the scene. It’s November 2022. You’re a high-ranking governmental delegate at the 27th United Nations Climate Change conference in Sharm el-Sheikh. You represent a Mediterranean nation, and answer directly to the Minister of State. Within broad pre-set limits, you have free reign to negotiate and agree to tabled proposals. Over your morning cappuccino at a harbourside café, you peruse a report prepared by a diligent civil servant. Incredibly, it seems as if ‘superyachts’ are responsible for more greenhouse gases even than private jets. Who knew? And there are tens of thousands of such jets around the world. Something must be done. The civil servant points to a report by Oxfam, a highly respect international NGO, entitled Carbon billionaires The investment emissions of the world’s richest people . It states: “ Another study drew on public records to estimate that in 2018 emissions from the private yachts, planes, helicopters and mansions of 20 billionaires generated on average about 8,194 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2e). ” FURTHER REINFORCEMENT Oxfam’s report credits an academic paper as its source: “ B. Barros and R. Wilk. (2021). The outsized carbon footprints of the super-rich ”. Ever diligent, your civil servant has already found this paper online. It’s by Professor Richard Wilk and PhD candidate Beatriz Barros, no less. They claim “ Among the many possessions of billionaires, large “superyachts” are by far the largest producers of greenhouse gases. Three-quarters of the billionaires in our sample owned a yacht with an average length of 276 feet (84 meters), and their average carbon equivalent emissions were 7,018 tons per year. ” Wow – these superyachts are huge, with a carbon footprint to match. You ask the civil servant how many billionaires there are in the world. She taps away on her laptop and replies that Forbes’ 36th Annual World’s Billionaires List: Facts And Figures 2022 states that there are now 2,668 billionaires in the world. Oh my goodness – if that’s the output from just 20, how much CO2 are 2,668 yachts going to produce? I mean, they must nearly all have one – right? But how respected is Barros & Wilk’s paper? The civil servant Googles. She finds a Financial Times article entitled Superyachts aim to go green – but at what cost? in which it’s says “ Research by anthropologists Beatriz Barros and Richard Wilk of Indiana University into the carbon footprints of the super-rich found that yachts contributed an outsized share of the carbon emissions of the billionaires who own them — far more than their private jets or mansions .” The FT. Well that’s that then. As politicians, we must act – and fast. We must tax these superyachts out of existence. You finish your cappuccino and head over to the conference venue with a purposeful stride. REALITY CHECK But dig a little deeper, and you’ll also find that Wilk & Barros’s sample comprised just twenty billionaires. That’s right. Twenty. They even admit that, “ This is not in any way a representative sample of billionaires. ” Indeed not. Moreover, their “average” yacht with a length of 84 metres is likely to have a gross tonnage of, say 2,500. In fact, the actual average gross tonnage of all 30+ metres yachts sold in 2021 was just 440 (source: SuperYacht Times, The State of Yachting 2022 ). As it was outside the scope of their studies, Wilk & Barros calculated fuel consumption using a 2018 paper by Luisa Menano de Figueiredo, The Yacht of 2030 – which looked, according to Wilk & Barros, at the cruising records of just ten yachts. Wilk & Barros do not explain their methodology. Had they looked more closely at de Figueiredo’s paper, in fact just eight yachts (not ten) were tracked, for a 90-day period, while in the Caribbean – as this was all the AIS data available. And de Figueiredo’s paper only concerned motor vessels – not sailing yachts. MORE NONSENSE Indeed, a misleading body of academic literature is starting to build. Respected academics Lynch, Long, Stretesky & Barrett, from the University of South Florida, Oklahoma State University, Northumbria University and Eastern Michigan University respectively stated in their 2019 academic paper Measuring the Ecological Impact of the Wealthy: Excessive Consumption, Ecological Disorganization, Green Crime, and Justice that “ Specifically, we draw attention to assessing aspects of ecological footprints of super yachts, super homes, luxury vehicles, and private jets. Taken together, the construction and use of these items in the United States alone is likely to create a CO2 footprint that exceeds those from entire nations. These results are not necessarily surprising but suggest that excessive consumption practices of the wealthy may need to be reinterpreted as criminal when they disrupt the normal regeneration and reproduction of ecosystems by generating excessive ecological disorganization. ” Strong stuff. Specifically, this paper states “ From available data, we estimated that an average (71 meter) SY uses about 107,000 gallons gasoline/year and produces 2.1 million pounds of carbon dioxide emissions annually .” As set out above, 71 metres is, of course, way above average. And specific data sources aren’t given – as one might expect. Instead, there’s a list of references at the end. The only one relating to yachts is given as “ Mathew, Jerin. 2015. “True Cost of Owning a Super Yacht.” International Business Times, May 15. Retrieved April 19, 2019 (http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/true-cost-owning-super-yacht-1498302). ” This is a short report publicising a fun, marketing infographic produced by an insurance company. That infographic states that a 71-metre yacht will consume (exactly) 500 litres of diesel per hour, and the owner will spend precisely $400,000 on fuel. Not a cent more and not a cent less. Etc. General sources are listed at the bottom of the infographic, including Wikipedia and superyachtfan.com. A fun piece of marketing, but hardly data to form a foundation for erudite scholarship. More recently, a paper by Wang, Maidment, Boccolini and Wright, of Solent University in the UK, stated in their paper Life cycle assessment of alternative marine fuels for super yacht that, " There is little argument that, with an estimated average cost of US$275 million only the wealthiest individuals in the world can afford to purchase and operate a superyacht (Alicia, 2015). " An estimate which is inaccurate by a factor of, say, ten - at least - by which has been recycled without question or fact-checking. CONCLUSION It’s easy to dismiss such works as politically motivated tirades by joyless, virtue-signalling lecturers, with a jaundiced worldview. Yet the figures generated are taken at face-value not only by climate activists but by respected journalists. As owners, we need to collect accurate data, and present it clearly, alongside information about our many and various yacht-based climate research and conservation initiatives. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who provided perspectives for this white paper. The media is full of data about the carbon footprint of large yachts. This data is taken as gospel by campaign groups. After all, the journalists refer to published, peer-reviewed academic papers. And these are clever people, right? Well it appears not. Or least their political jaundice means that they’re not fussed about fact-checking. If we’re not careful, policy makers may regard such research as correct and unchallengeable. 23 November 2022 Last revised minutes 5 Reading time minutes 5 Reading time 23 November 2022 Last revised The media is full of data about the carbon footprint of large yachts. This data is taken as gospel by campaign groups. After all, the journalists refer to published, peer-reviewed academic papers. And these are clever people, right? Well it appears not. Or least their political jaundice means that they’re not fussed about fact-checking. If we’re not careful, policy makers may regard such research as correct and unchallengeable. There is a growing body of misleading academic literature on the ecological impact of luxury items. Yet the figures generated by such studies are taken at face value by climate activists and journalists. A recent academic report suggests that 'superyachts' emit more greenhouse gases than private jets, concluding with a call for action. The report, in turn, refers to a study by academics Barros and Wilk, claiming that superyachts owned by billionaires have significant carbon footprints. However, the sample size of the study is small and not representative, and the average yacht size mentioned is much larger than reality, and fuel consumption calculations are based on limited data. We, as onwers, need to be collecting accurate data and provide clear information about yacht-based climate impact. You can also read about Speaking Volumes Questions or comments? Please contact us Join the discussion over in the Club's group You can also read about Speaking Volumes Questions or comments? Please contact us

Without sufficient security in place, having provided a loan to a shell company to buy an expensive, mobile asset, lenders could be left out-of-pocket and finance would be impossible to obtain. While loan security can be found in various documents, the requirements themselves can always be traced back to the loan agreement. Home Handbook Financing / / Loan Security 4 April 2017 Last revised minutes 6 Reading time Without sufficient security in place, having provided a loan to a shell company to buy an expensive, mobile asset, lenders could be left out-of-pocket and finance would be impossible to obtain. While loan security can be found in various documents, the requirements themselves can always be traced back to the loan agreement. minutes 6 Reading time 4 April 2017 Last revised Without sufficient security in place, having provided a loan to a shell company to buy an expensive, mobile asset, lenders could be left out-of-pocket and finance would be impossible to obtain. While loan security can be found in various documents, the requirements themselves can always be traced back to the loan agreement. Unpaid crew, suppliers, and collision victims have liens over yachts, creating competing claims for lenders. Port authorities can detain a yacht for unpaid dues, further complicating the lender's position. Yards can have possessory liens on yachts if the owner hasn't paid for works carried out. Mortgages grant lenders rights against the yacht itself in the event of default, and they are the most important type of security. Mortgage registration is essential, either as a statutory mortgage or a common law mortgage, to establish priority and enforceability. Covenants and assignments supplement the mortgage document and dictate obligations and transfers of rights. Deeds of covenant and collateral security documents cannot be registered but are still important for additional protection. Non-statutory mortgages serve as a backup when statutory mortgages are invalid, but they have limitations in enforcement. Yacht registration is required, and the deed ensures the yacht remains registered throughout the mortgage term. Insurance covenants are crucial, and policies must cover the yacht and third-party liabilities to safeguard the lender's interests. Covenants and assignments supplement the mortgage document and dictate obligations and transfers of rights. Deeds of covenant and collateral security documents cannot be registered but are still important for additional protection. Non-statutory mortgages serve as a backup when statutory mortgages are invalid, but they have limitations in enforcement. Yacht registration is required, and the deed ensures the yacht remains registered throughout the mortgage term. Insurance covenants are crucial, and policies must cover the yacht and third-party liabilities to safeguard the lender's interests. Unpaid crew, suppliers, and collision victims have liens over yachts, creating competing claims for lenders. Port authorities can detain a yacht for unpaid dues, further complicating the lender's position. Yards can have possessory liens on yachts if the owner hasn't paid for works carried out. Mortgages grant lenders rights against the yacht itself in the event of default, and they are the most important type of security. Mortgage registration is essential, either as a statutory mortgage or a common law mortgage, to establish priority and enforceability. At the outset, it’s important to note that, with regards the yacht, the lender can still be left competing with the following who may automatically have claims against a yacht – which is why security has to be so wide-ranging: Unpaid crew and suppliers, collision victims, etc, all have liens over yachts Port authorities can have a statutory right to detain a yacht for unpaid dues Yards can have possessory liens where works have been carried for which the owner hasn’t paid: where the yacht is out of the water, it’s a case of no-cash-no-splash MORTGAGES A mortgage grants a lender (the ‘mortgagee’) rights against the yacht itself (known as rights ‘in rem’), rather than just against the owner (the ‘mortgagor’) in the event of default. While it still needs to be beefed-up by other types of security, such as covenants, and assignments of earnings and insurances, the mortgage is the most important type of security taken by a lender. Mortgages over yachts are known as ship mortgages to distinguish them from real estate mortgages. A mortgage can be taken over the whole yacht or just a number of the 64 available shares. MORTGAGE REGISTRATION The mortgagee’s power to sell the yacht in the event of default is specifically granted by statute. A mortgage is said to be ‘statutory’ where it has been set out and registered as prescribed by statute (in this case, regulation 57 of, Merchant Shipping (Registration of Ships) Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/3138) and paragraph 7 of Schedule 1 to the Merchant Shipping Act 1995. Otherwise, they are known as ‘common law’ mortgages but these are very unusual. A statutory mortgage can only be created over a yacht registered under Part I (but not the Part III ‘Small Ships Register’). The mortgagee will likely use a Form 4736 ‘Account Current’ statutory mortgage to secure not just the principal sum and interest but also costs and expenses. A Notice of Mortgage Intent MSF 4739 can be lodged in advance in order to record as early a date as possible for the mortgage: this is important when establishing the priority of debts in the event of later default. The mortgage is a brief document, just setting out the names of the parties, details of the yacht, and a short description of the secured obligation with reference to the agreement and the deed of covenant that supplements the mortgage. It must be lodged with the Registrar General of Shipping and Seamen, and the relevant fee paid. The Registrar will the register and returned the mortgage document. Where the mortgagor is a company registered in England and Wales, then, by virtue of section 860 of the Companies Act 2006, details of the statutory mortgage, the deed of covenant and any other security documents must be sent to the Registrar of Companies within 21 days, failing which such documents will be void as against a creditor, liquidator or administrator. COVENANTS & ASSIGNMENTS As the mortgage document itself is so brief, and there’s no scope for amending or adding to it, and also as the mortgage attaches to the yacht rather than the owner, it must be supplemented by covenants and assignments. Covenants dictate various dos and don’ts, and may be set out in the loan agreement and/or separately in a deed of covenant according to the lender’s house style. Assignments transfer rights from one party to another. The remainder of this article considers common covenants and assignments. For convenience, it is assumed that all covenants are set out in a deed. Unlike mortgages, deeds of covenant, and any other collateral security documents, cannot be registered with the Registrar of Ships. NON-STATUTORY MORTGAGE While a deed supports the mortgage, deeds can still have a clause by which the yacht is mortgaged. This is needed as a backup in case the statutory mortgage is invalid – which can be the case where, for example, the mortgage hasn’t been registered with the Companies Register. The deed will create a non-statutory mortgage which, while better than nothing, won’t be enforceable against a buyer who buys in good faith and isn’t aware of the mortgage, and will be ranked below a statutory mortgage should the mortgagor default. YACHT REGISTRATION The mortgagor will promise in the deed the yacht will be registered as a ship in the United Kingdom, and will remain, so, under the same registered name, for as long as the yacht is mortgaged. This is necessary as UK Part I ship registrations expire after only five years unless renewed. CHARGE REGISTRATION The deed will require, where the owner is a company registered in England or Wales, the mortgage to be registered as a charge with the United Kingdom companies register (known as Companies House). This is fallback requirement as the mortgagee isn’t going to leave anything to chance and will (or should) have registered the mortgage as soon as possible as not doing so risks the mortgagee loosing both the security and priority. INSURANCE Arguably just as important as the mortgage is the borrower’s covenants in respect of insurance, and policy assignments. In particular, the borrower covenants to: At the borrower’s expense, insure the yacht, for a value, on terms, and with an underwriter(s), all agreed with the lender. Comply with all policy terms throughout the term of the loan, including, of course, prompt payment of insurance premiums. Renew policies as needed to maintain cover. Not settle a claim without the lender’s consent It’s not only the yacht itself which must be insured, but third party liabilities which, if not satisfied, will expose the yacht itself to claims which might rank higher than the lender’s as mortgagee. Particular risks must also be covered, such as war risks, and mortgagee’s interest insurance. The latter provides cover where a failing on the borrower’s part means that other policies are rendered ineffective. For larger yachts, the policies must be assignable to the lender, and confirmation will have to be provided by underwriters that such assignments are noted on the policies and that proceeds of the insurance will be paid to the lender if necessary. For smaller yachts, it may be sufficient for the lender to be named as a co-assured on the policy. CLASSIFICATION SOCIETY An explanation as to the role of classification societies (often known as ‘class’) can be found here . Assuming the yacht must be classed, if the yacht isn’t maintained and surveyed as Class Rules stipulate, the yacht is said to be ‘out of class’ – which can lead to insurance policies being invalidated, as well as the yacht not being maintained properly. As this would jeopardise the mortgagee’s security, the deed of covenant will stipulate maintenance in class. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE Depending on the yacht’s length, gross tonnage and whether it’s registered for chartering, it will be subject to various regulations which help ensure it’s used safely. H ere’s a summary of those affecting your yacht . As well as being detained by port officials, non-compliance can render insurances void, which has obvious implications for the mortgagee’s financial security. Compliance with such regulations will be a key provision. INSPECTION As Class rules and flag state regulations only help to ensure the safe construction, maintenance and operation of the yacht, the mortgagee will want to have the opportunity to inspect the vessel to ensure that aesthetic aspects, and with them much of her value, are also being maintained. The mortgagee must therefore have a right to inspect, and this can be supported by a specific minimum value. MANAGEMENT While ‘yacht management’ can cover a broad spectrum of support services, regulations may require management of a specific type and quality, failing which the vessel may be off-cover for insurance purposes and liable to detention following a port state inspection. Managers also vary in approach and quality. Unsurprisingly, therefore, mortgagees will want to approve which manager is appointed. OPERATIONS The mortgagee may wish to restrict the movement of the yacht, not only by stipulating that she is to be kept out of waters close to areas known for piracy or adjacent to unstable countries, but also away from areas where actions in the event of default may be difficult or impractical. It may also be necessary for the deed to spell out that the yacht is to be used in a legal way – for example, not chartering out where the yacht is not registered as a commercial vessel and insured accordingly. CHARTERING An assignment of chartering income (if any) can be a helpful tool for a lender looking to recoup money, especially while awaiting the sale of a yacht in the event of default. Written notice will need to be served on the charterers – which can be commercially awkward for the borrower and a good incentive to keep on track with loan repayments. INCIDENTS Where any kind of incident occurs involving the yacht, whether that be a fire, grounding, flooding, or a legal action such as arrest or other formal court proceedings, the mortgagee will want to know right away, and the deed of covenant will reflect this. Crucially, liens can rank higher than a mortgage. MODIFICATIONS Refits don’t always improve or even add value to yachts: an owner’s ‘personal stamp’ can adversely affect value and may not even be carried in compliance with regulations. The mortgagee will want to know about, and if necessary veto, any proposed modifications. DISPOSAL While obvious, it needs to be set out in the deed of covenant that the mortgagor cannot sell the yacht while it provides security. COLLATERAL SECURITY As well as the mortgage and deed of covenant, the lender may want a mortgage or charge over the shares in the yacht owning company, involving share certificates being deposited with the lender, together with signed but undated stock transfers. Going one stage further, the lender may also require a personal guarantee from the beneficial owner. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Loan Enforcement Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Loan Enforcement

Unavailable at present Latest Position Example Brokerage & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 96 m Length Builder & Co Builder 2021 Build year 1400 Gross tonnage Italy Registry Particulars Pattern

Unavailable at present Latest Position Superyachts'R'Us Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 26 m Length Builder & Co Builder 2012 Build year 80 Gross tonnage Marshall Islands Registry Particulars Yardstick

As Members know, yachts aren’t run on shoestring budgets. And most of the money is spent not by them in person, but by their captains and other trusted third parties. In highly competitive marketplaces, there is an incentive to buy business with formal ‘commissions’, extravagant ‘thank you’s – or perhaps just a good old brown envelope. Home Handbook Employing / / Commission or Kickback? 2 November 2013 Last revised minutes 3 Reading time As Members know, yachts aren’t run on shoestring budgets. And most of the money is spent not by them in person, but by their captains and other trusted third parties. In highly competitive marketplaces, there is an incentive to buy business with formal ‘commissions’, extravagant ‘thank you’s – or perhaps just a good old brown envelope. minutes 3 Reading time 2 November 2013 Last revised As Members know, yachts aren’t run on shoestring budgets. And most of the money is spent not by them in person, but by their captains and other trusted third parties. In highly competitive marketplaces, there is an incentive to buy business with formal ‘commissions’, extravagant ‘thank you’s – or perhaps just a good old brown envelope. T he Bribery Act 2010 in th e UK is considered one of the toughest anti-bribery laws globally, with similar principles found in the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The Act applies extraterritorially, meaning that a crime can be committed even if the transaction occurs outside of the UK. There are four key offences under the Act: bribing, receiving a bribe, bribing a foreign public official, and failing to prevent bribery. Bribing involves offering or promising a financial or other advantage in exchange for improper performance of a function or activity, while receiving a bribe includes requesting or accepting such an advantage. Local practices should be disregarded when determining improperness, unless they are part of the written local law. Hospitality can be considered bribery if it is disproportionately generous, especially in industries focused on luxury. The offence of failing to prevent bribery applies to all commercial organizations, including companies and partnerships operating in the UK. Bribery crimes committed outside the UK can be investigated and prosecuted if there is a "close connection" to the UK, such as being a UK passport holder or ordinarily resident. The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in the UK handles corruption allegations involving UK nationals or incorporated bodies overseas, and there is international cooperation in investigating and prosecuting bribery and corruption. The United States' Foreign Corrupt Practices Act allows payments to foreign public officials to expedite their duties, even if it violates local laws. Civil actions can also be taken against individuals involved in bribery, and a criminal conviction serves as proof of civil liability. The offence of failing to prevent bribery applies to all commercial organizations, including companies and partnerships operating in the UK. Bribery crimes committed outside the UK can be investigated and prosecuted if there is a "close connection" to the UK, such as being a UK passport holder or ordinarily resident. The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in the UK handles corruption allegations involving UK nationals or incorporated bodies overseas, and there is international cooperation in investigating and prosecuting bribery and corruption. The United States' Foreign Corrupt Practices Act allows payments to foreign public officials to expedite their duties, even if it violates local laws. Civil actions can also be taken against individuals involved in bribery, and a criminal conviction serves as proof of civil liability. T he Bribery Act 2010 in th e UK is considered one of the toughest anti-bribery laws globally, with similar principles found in the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The Act applies extraterritorially, meaning that a crime can be committed even if the transaction occurs outside of the UK. There are four key offences under the Act: bribing, receiving a bribe, bribing a foreign public official, and failing to prevent bribery. Bribing involves offering or promising a financial or other advantage in exchange for improper performance of a function or activity, while receiving a bribe includes requesting or accepting such an advantage. Local practices should be disregarded when determining improperness, unless they are part of the written local law. Hospitality can be considered bribery if it is disproportionately generous, especially in industries focused on luxury. In the United Kingdom, giving incentives and rewards may be a criminal offence – or not – according to whether it falls foul of the Bribery Act 2010 . This law is widely recognised as the toughest of its kind in the world, but its principles are much the same in the rest of the world, including the United States’ Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Significantly, under the Bribery Act, a crime may be committed even if the transaction takes place outside of the UK. This was already the effect of a small and little-known piece of anti-terror legislation introduced in 2001, but the globe-trotting aspects of the 2010 Act are clearer and more coherent. COMMISSIONS To be clear, a lot of commission arrangements are perfectly legal – but it’s easy to overstep the mark, and there can be a false assumption that formality means legality. The penalties for getting it wrong include an unusually long prison sentence and unlimited fines. OFFENCES There are four key offences: Bribing Receiving a bribe Bribing a foreign public official, and Failing to prevent bribery Bribing occurs when a person offers, gives, or promises to give, a financial or other advantage to someone else in exchange for ‘improperly’ performing a function or activity. Receiving a bribe is defined as requesting, accepting or agreeing to accept such an advantage. An activity will be ‘improperly’ performed when any expectation of good faith or impartiality has been breached, or when the function has been performed in a way not expected of a person in a position of trust. Helpful, this now clarifies what is expected when a commission is an overt element of any business model – even where this may lead to a reduced commission. GREASING PALMS So what about those instances where greasing palms to get things to happen is just the way things work? The Act states that local practises should be disregarded when deciding on improperness – unless they form part of the written local law. While the UK authorities are alive to the necessity of ‘facilitation payments’, official tolerance relates only to small payments, made by companies with the right bribery policies and procedures in place. HOSPITALITY Hospitality can constitute bribery if it is disproportionately generous. In an industry devoted to luxury, it can be easy for crewmembers to confuse the lifestyle of their wealthy employers with their own – and not think twice about receiving hospitality which, seen from afar, is completely over the top. PREVENTION The offence of failing to prevent bribery applies only to ‘commercial organisations’, but this includes any company or partnership carrying on any business in the UK. Conceivably, this could yacht owning companies managed from the UK. With regard to the first three offences, while crimes committed outside the UK (except on board UK-flagged vessels) are normally beyond the jurisdiction of the courts, this is not the case with bribery. Given its seriousness, it’s one of a unique group of crimes (along with terrorism and war crimes) that the authorities can and will investigate worldwide. All that’s needed is a ‘close connection’ with the UK – including just being a passport-holder or ordinarily resident. INVESTIGATION The UK’s Serious Fraud Office (SFO) acts as the focal point for any allegations of corruption by UK nationals or incorporated bodies overseas, while the City of London Police has an Overseas Anti-Corruption Unit with the specific function of supporting overseas corruption investigations undertaken by the SFO. The idea that prosecuting authorities have tentacles that can reach worldwide is not limited to the UK. As with many areas of the criminal law, most countries’ laws are broadly similar, and both European Union and United Nations conventions provide for international co-operation with regard to both the investigation and prosecution of bribery and corruption. UNITED STATES While the reach of law enforcers in the United States is equally global in nature, however, a slight difference can be seen in their approach, as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 allows payments to be made to foreign public officials to facilitate or expedite their performance of the duties they’re already bound to perform, even if this still violates local laws. So making a payment to an official to speed up a visa application, for example, would be acceptable. CIVIL ACTION In addition to the threat of prosecution, an owner may sue an employee or other agent for any loss – and, while a criminal conviction is not necessary for a civil action, it would be undeniable proof of civil liability. The owner may also be able to withdraw from the contract agreed to by the agent, whether or not he or she brings an action against the agent, and this option may be useful if, for example, the owner has managed to find a better deal elsewhere. CONCLUSION While it might seem that the authorities are coming down rather hard on corruption, it’s not because they are trying to spearhead some kind of moral crusade but simply because corruption distorts rational product and service choices, which can ultimately prevent the cream of the industry from rising to the top, distort markets and threaten economic growth. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Harassment Prevention Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Harassment Prevention

Piracy raises a matrix of legal issues, just at the time when the consideration of these will be the last thing on anyone’s mind. This reinforces the desirability of taking advice in advance and, if necessary, placing a trained and equipped security team on board. For those with real concerns about security, compared with highways, houses and offices, yachts will always be – by far – the most secure location. Home Handbook Managing / / Piracy & Protection 16 April 2010 Last revised minutes 4 Reading time Piracy raises a matrix of legal issues, just at the time when the consideration of these will be the last thing on anyone’s mind. This reinforces the desirability of taking advice in advance and, if necessary, placing a trained and equipped security team on board. For those with real concerns about security, compared with highways, houses and offices, yachts will always be – by far – the most secure location. minutes 4 Reading time 16 April 2010 Last revised Piracy raises a matrix of legal issues, just at the time when the consideration of these will be the last thing on anyone’s mind. This reinforces the desirability of taking advice in advance and, if necessary, placing a trained and equipped security team on board. For those with real concerns about security, compared with highways, houses and offices, yachts will always be – by far – the most secure location. Piracy is defined as any illegal act of violence, detention, or destruction committed by the crew or passengers of a private vessel against another vessel or persons/property on board, outside any country's territorial waters. Hotspots for piracy include the coasts of Indonesia, Somalia, Bangladesh, Nigeria and some South American countries. Insurance coverage for yachts usually has restrictions on cruising areas, and breaching these restrictions may void coverage . Insurers have a broader definition of piracy than the legal definition, as attacks are more likely to occur within territorial waters. Obtaining up-to-date information on current piracy hotspots is crucial, and insurers and maritime security firms can provide assistance. Maintaining vigilance and employing defence measures such as acoustic defence systems and strong-rooms are recommended for yachts in high-risk areas. The legality of carrying weapons depends on the laws of the flag state (where the yacht is registered) and the port state (where the yacht is located). Some countries allow firearms on board as part of the yacht's equipment, while others prohibit certain weapons entirely. Legal consequences and the use of firearms in self-defence can vary depending on the laws of the flag state, port state, and international criminal law. Recognizing pirates can be challenging, and preemptive action may have legal implications. Self-defence and defence of others must be reasonable and proportional to the perceived threat. Maintaining vigilance and employing defence measures such as acoustic defence systems and strong-rooms are recommended for yachts in high-risk areas. The legality of carrying weapons depends on the laws of the flag state (where the yacht is registered) and the port state (where the yacht is located). Some countries allow firearms on board as part of the yacht's equipment, while others prohibit certain weapons entirely. Legal consequences and the use of firearms in self-defence can vary depending on the laws of the flag state, port state, and international criminal law. Recognizing pirates can be challenging, and preemptive action may have legal implications. Self-defence and defence of others must be reasonable and proportional to the perceived threat. Piracy is defined as any illegal act of violence, detention, or destruction committed by the crew or passengers of a private vessel against another vessel or persons/property on board, outside any country's territorial waters. Hotspots for piracy include the coasts of Indonesia, Somalia, Bangladesh, Nigeria and some South American countries. Insurance coverage for yachts usually has restrictions on cruising areas, and breaching these restrictions may void coverage . Insurers have a broader definition of piracy than the legal definition, as attacks are more likely to occur within territorial waters. Obtaining up-to-date information on current piracy hotspots is crucial, and insurers and maritime security firms can provide assistance. Piracy is defined internationally by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Articles 101–103. Although local laws may add to this definition, the crime essentially consists of: Any illegal act of violence, detention, or destruction, Committed for private ends, By the crew or passengers of a private vessel, Against another vessel or against persons or property on board another vessel, Which is outside any country’s territorial waters; or Any act of inciting or intentionally facilitating such an act. HOTSPOTS Attacks are logged on the website of Commercial Crime Services (CCS), a division of the International Chamber of Commerce. Currently, while the principal hotspots are to be found off the coasts of Indonesia, Somalia, Bangladesh and Nigeria, acts have been committed off the coasts of various South American countries and even in the Caribbean. INSURANCE Insurers are usually very strict about where yachts can and cannot cruise while remaining covered. Any breach of these restrictions will allow them to escape paying out in the event of a claim for absolutely anything. Once the owner has decided where he or she wishes to cruise, this must be disclosed to the insurer if it is outside the area permitted in the policy, and additional cover negotiated – the cost of which will reflect any perceived increase in risk. In common with the IMB, the definition of ‘piracy’ used by insurers is generally much wider than that given above. This is fortunate since, statistically, attacks are more likely to occur within a state’s own territorial waters – i.e. within 12 nautical miles of the adjacent shoreline. Although piracy risks are specifically covered by the standard ‘Institute Yacht Clauses (1/11/85)’, which are the most commonly-used first-party insurance terms, the risks should still be discussed with the broker anyway. Where, unusually, the policy is not subject to English law, then it may be prudent to take independent legal advice. INFORMATION Patterns of worldwide piracy fluctuate with the political stability and, to a lesser extent, the economic fortunes of adjacent states. It is imperative to obtain up-to-date advice on where the current trouble spots are. Insurers can help with this, although specialist maritime security firms can often provide more detailed information. It should be noted that the security industry is not well regulated in some countries, and firms’ services vary in quality. DEFENCE Although the advice to all yachts travelling in high-risk areas is to maintain particular vigilance, and defences such as acoustic defence systems, satellite-alert systems and strong-rooms are options, the question most commonly raised is whether weapons are, legally, an option. To decide what’s legal and what’s not, it’s necessary to know which countries’ laws apply to any given situation. One needs to consider both the ‘Flag State’ law and the ‘Port State’ law. The Flag State law is the law of the country where the yacht is registered: it governs what happens on board the yacht, wherever in the world the yacht is located, as if the yacht was a small, floating piece of that country. The Port State law is that of the country in whose territorial waters the yacht is located – not just in or around any particular port. EQUIPMENT To take the example of one of the most popular Flag States, the United Kingdom, weapons may kept on board, but not all types. Under the Firearms Act 1968, as amended, firearms (including shotguns) and associated ammunition normally require a licence for purchase and possession. A firearm and ammunition, however, can be possessed on board a yacht, if it forms part of that yacht’s ‘equipment’, without the need for such a licence. A police permit is still needed to bring the firearm to and from the yacht, and a licence required to purchase the firearm in the first place. Section 5 of the same Act still outlaws some weapons altogether for the general public, including: Automatic and semi-automatic weapons, Pump-action weapons, Pistols, other than flare guns, Rocket launchers, other than those used for line-throwing or signalling, Air guns using gas cartridges, and Pepper sprays, TASER®s, etc. Port States will have their own laws relating to possession and disclosure. Researching and complying with these can be difficult and expert advice is a must. ACTION Clearly, there is no point in having weapons on board unless someone is prepared to use them. Introducing them into the equation might change a confrontation into a shoot-out. Guns in untrained hands are not an option. It is also very difficult to work out in advance what the legal consequences of firing shots might be. Thankfully, this choice can be neatly sidestepped by placing a specialist security team on board just for the necessary passages. Shooting at someone whilst they are on another vessel potentially constitutes an act of violence committed on both vessels. The shooter will therefore be subject to the laws of both Flag States, plus that of the Port State if the shooting occurs within 12 nautical miles of the coast (although this limit may not be respected in all countries). Looking by way of example at the UK criminal law, which is followed in much of the world, the raising of a weapon at a suspected pirate, who in fact wasn’t, could constitute an ‘assault’, i.e. putting someone in fear of violence. Shooting a pirate (or otherwise harming him) could lead to charges of grievous bodily harm, where serious injury is caused. Where the pirate is unintentionally or intentionally killed, manslaughter or murder charges could follow. Obviously, a number of defences could be put forward in response, the most useful of which would be self-defence or the defence of another. The accused would not need to have retreated as far as possible before the act of self-defence. Indeed, an act of self-defence or the defence of another may be pre-emptive, given reasonable apprehension. If the threat of force would have been enough, it may be unreasonable to go ahead and use force. If one person on a yacht is threatened, all are can be seen as having been threatened. The force used in self-defence or in the defence of another must be ‘reasonable’ in the circumstances as the accused saw it. What is reasonable would be up to the jury and difficult to predict. The main practical problem is recognising whether or not the yacht is faced with pirates. Until they raise a weapon in your direction or commit any act of violence against anyone, they are just other seafarers. Attack first, and you risk becoming the pirate. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Going Dark Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Going Dark

Unavailable at present Latest Position Wright A Way & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 105 m Length Builder & Co Builder 2022 Build year 1980 Gross tonnage Panama Registry Particulars Role Model

As soon as you enter any country’s waters, you’re under an obligation to abide by all their laws. Detailed onboard examinations are used to check compliance. Port State Control (PSC) is the system of inspection by officials to check vessels’ condition and operation. Safety, security, environmental protection and seafarer welfare are the areas of interest. Port States can require defects to be put right, and detain vessels if necessary. This is all separate, and in addition to, any consideration of the tax status of the owner, beneficial owner and yacht. Home Handbook Regulation / / Port State Control 19 June 2011 Last revised minutes 3 Reading time As soon as you enter any country’s waters, you’re under an obligation to abide by all their laws. Detailed onboard examinations are used to check compliance. Port State Control (PSC) is the system of inspection by officials to check vessels’ condition and operation. Safety, security, environmental protection and seafarer welfare are the areas of interest. Port States can require defects to be put right, and detain vessels if necessary. This is all separate, and in addition to, any consideration of the tax status of the owner, beneficial owner and yacht. minutes 3 Reading time 19 June 2011 Last revised As soon as you enter any country’s waters, you’re under an obligation to abide by all their laws. Detailed onboard examinations are used to check compliance. Port State Control (PSC) is the system of inspection by officials to check vessels’ condition and operation. Safety, security, environmental protection and seafarer welfare are the areas of interest. Port States can require defects to be put right, and detain vessels if necessary. This is all separate, and in addition to, any consideration of the tax status of the owner, beneficial owner and yacht. The Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (Paris MoU) includes European Union coastal countries, Canada, Croatia, Norway, and Russia, among others. The Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure & Environment provides the secretariat for the Paris MoU. The Paris MoU introduced the New Inspection Regime (NIR) which aims to inspect 100% of all ships, including yachts, visiting ports in the Paris MoU region over a three-year period. Yachts are now included in the NIR and are subject to assessments regarding safety, health, and the environment. Vessels are categorized into High Risk Ships, Standard Risk Ships, and Low Risk Ships, determining the frequency of inspections. The risk categorization is based on factors such as previous inspections, vessel type and age, the yacht's manager's performance, and the country of registry. Inspections are not meant to disrupt cruising schedules but are necessary for compliance. Inspections focus on training, management systems, and the physical integrity of the yacht to ensure safety for the owner, guests, and crew. Preparation is key to a hassle-free inspection, including compliance with relevant rules, crew training, and detailed guidelines. Safety and security procedures must be followed, and honesty is crucial during inspections, as falsifying records or lying to officials is a serious offence. The risk categorization is based on factors such as previous inspections, vessel type and age, the yacht's manager's performance, and the country of registry. Inspections are not meant to disrupt cruising schedules but are necessary for compliance. Inspections focus on training, management systems, and the physical integrity of the yacht to ensure safety for the owner, guests, and crew. Preparation is key to a hassle-free inspection, including compliance with relevant rules, crew training, and detailed guidelines. Safety and security procedures must be followed, and honesty is crucial during inspections, as falsifying records or lying to officials is a serious offence. The Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (Paris MoU) includes European Union coastal countries, Canada, Croatia, Norway, and Russia, among others. The Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure & Environment provides the secretariat for the Paris MoU. The Paris MoU introduced the New Inspection Regime (NIR) which aims to inspect 100% of all ships, including yachts, visiting ports in the Paris MoU region over a three-year period. Yachts are now included in the NIR and are subject to assessments regarding safety, health, and the environment. Vessels are categorized into High Risk Ships, Standard Risk Ships, and Low Risk Ships, determining the frequency of inspections. All European Union coastal countries, and Canada, Croatia, Norway, and Russia, are party to the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (Paris MoU). The Hague-based Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure & Environment provides the secretariat. There are 6 other MoU blocs worldwide. INSPECTION REGIME The Paris MoU New Inspection Regime (NIR) introduced a target of inspecting, over any three-year period, 100% of all the ships visiting ports and anchorages in the Paris MoU region. Yachts have been lumped-in with trading ships and ferries. The NIR applies to “ships”, which includes all yachts. Where a yacht is so small, or is not chartered, such that parts of the various maritime conventions (SOLAS, MARPOL, etc) do not apply, the PSC’s task is now to “…to assess whether the ship is of an acceptable standard in regard to safety, health or the environment.” Further, in assessing such vessels, account must be taken, “…of such factors as the length and nature of the intended voyage or service, the size and type of the ship…”. All vessels are deemed to fall into one of three risk profiles. High Risk Ships must be inspected 5 to 6 months after the last inspection, Standard Risk Ships 10 to 12 months after the last inspection and Low Risk Ships 24 to 36 months after the last inspection. Additional inspections, however, can also be triggered by overriding or unexpected factors. Time windows for the next periodic inspection re-start after any inspection. Where a window has come and gone without checks having been carried – because a yacht has not called at a participating port – that yacht will automatically be targeted on arrival. The risk categorisation is based on a number of factors – including the details and results of previous Paris MoU inspections, the vessels’ type and age, the performance of the yacht’s manager and the country of registry. In fact, for a yacht to be a Low Risk Ship, the flag must be approved and appear on the annual Paris MoU White List. The United States, Switzerland, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Panama, and the Netherlands Antilles all fail to make the List. Unless a yacht is a High Risk Ship, port officials have the option of undertaking an initial inspection – then deciding whether or not to carry out a detailed inspection. INSPECTIONS Inspections are not intended to interrupt cruising schedules. They are carried out because they have to be. Most officials in most ports will be polite and efficient, but they can make life difficult if they choose to. While nearly all large yachts are extremely well presented, it is the training and management systems – as well as the physical integrity of the vessel – which is being examined. Poorly-run vessels can still present a hazard to the owner, guests and crew: perhaps it is better that these issues are picked up sooner rather than later. PREPARATION It’s up to the yacht’s captain and manager to ensure that the relevant rules are being complied with and that all crewmembers know what do in an emergency. Detailed guidelines and instructions should already be laid out, where these are mandatory, in the Safety Management System and Ship Security Plan, but it’s how these and other forms of pre-prepared guidance translate into reality that’s key to a fast and hassle-free inspection. First impressions are crucial. Do all the deckhands and steward(ess)s automatically know to be especially courteous with the PSC inspector? They may not be wearing an official uniform, and could just be yet another supplier. They may not take kindly to being told to remove their shoes – so a box of disposable shoe covers kept by the passarelle will get the process off on the right foot. Safety and security procedures must be followed at all times: it is the checks that count – not the ticks. Even where a guest may be inconvenienced by a safety briefing, this will be as nothing compared to the yacht being detained later. Falsifying logs and records, or lying to officials, will constitute a serious criminal offence. It is always better to admit a failing than to cover it up: the inspectors have seen it all before. Members would be well advised to discuss the possibility of inspection with captains and managers sooner rather than later. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about The ISM Code Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about The ISM Code

Just because charterer guests have paid a great deal of money for the exclusive use of a superyacht, this does not mean that he (or she) has the right to do with the boat and crew as he pleases. A Member recently sought advice with regard to redress following a charter during which guests behaved in a way which was at best depraved – and at worst illegal. Home Handbook Chartering Out / / Difficult Guests 3 October 2017 Last revised minutes 3 Reading time Just because charterer guests have paid a great deal of money for the exclusive use of a superyacht, this does not mean that he (or she) has the right to do with the boat and crew as he pleases. A Member recently sought advice with regard to redress following a charter during which guests behaved in a way which was at best depraved – and at worst illegal. minutes 3 Reading time 3 October 2017 Last revised Just because charterer guests have paid a great deal of money for the exclusive use of a superyacht, this does not mean that he (or she) has the right to do with the boat and crew as he pleases. A Member recently sought advice with regard to redress following a charter during which guests behaved in a way which was at best depraved – and at worst illegal. In the absence of an agreement stating otherwise, the broker marketing the yacht is considered the owner's agent and must act in the owner's best interests. Once the broker books the charter, the owner is bound by the charter agreement and must provide the yacht to the charterer. The terms of the charter agreement are often based on the MYBA Charter Agreement, which allows the owner to back out only in exceptional circumstances and with financial consequences. The captain is required by law to refuse illegal instructions from the charterer, but there are other unsavory or immoral actions that may not be illegal. The MYBA form explicitly prohibits certain behaviors, such as causing nuisance or disrepute, commercial photo shoots, and harassment of crewmembers. Any breach of the charter agreement may entitle the owner to terminate the contract immediately and claim damages. The captain must raise issues with the charterer before the owner can terminate the contract, according to the MYBA Charter Agreement. Despite the challenges, chartering can help offset the costs of owning large yachts with the right guidance and support. The MYBA form explicitly prohibits certain behaviors, such as causing nuisance or disrepute, commercial photo shoots, and harassment of crewmembers. Any breach of the charter agreement may entitle the owner to terminate the contract immediately and claim damages. The captain must raise issues with the charterer before the owner can terminate the contract, according to the MYBA Charter Agreement. Despite the challenges, chartering can help offset the costs of owning large yachts with the right guidance and support. In the absence of an agreement stating otherwise, the broker marketing the yacht is considered the owner's agent and must act in the owner's best interests. Once the broker books the charter, the owner is bound by the charter agreement and must provide the yacht to the charterer. The terms of the charter agreement are often based on the MYBA Charter Agreement, which allows the owner to back out only in exceptional circumstances and with financial consequences. The captain is required by law to refuse illegal instructions from the charterer, but there are other unsavory or immoral actions that may not be illegal. Had the owner known who the charterer was, he would have never have agreed. The charter broker was aware of the charterer’s reputation but remained silent until just before the start of the charter. In the absence of agreement to the contrary, the broker marketing the yacht on behalf of the owner will often be, in law, the owner’s agent. As such, the broker must perform with the appropriate care and skill, and not allow any conflict between personal interests and those of the principal. By booking a charter with someone known to be unsuitable, it could be said that the broker wasn’t careful and just wanted the commission. THE AGREEMENT Once the broker has booked the charter, however, the owner will have been bound by the charter agreement, and is bound to provide his yacht to the charterer. The terms will have been set out in the charter agreement. The most common terms are those published by the Mediterranean Yacht Brokers Association (‘MYBA’), which have also been adopted by the American Yacht Charter Association. The MYBA Charter Agreement only allows the owner to back out as a result of circumstances beyond his control, on pain of reimbursing the owner plus an extra 50%. EDGY BEHAVIOUR While, subject to the charter agreement, the yacht is the charterer’s to do with as he pleases, the captain is obliged by law to refuse to comply with illegal instructions. However, there are many things a charterer may do which, while unsavoury or immoral, are not illegal. The MYBA form therefore expressly bans, for example, behaviour causing nuisance or disrepute, commercial photo shoots, and harassment of crewmembers. Member’s Experience: “ I have been chartering my yachts for more than 15 years and have maintained an excellent relationship with brokers and charterers. In fact, my yachts are considered some of the most successful yachts on the charter market. What has occurred is certainly an aberration and not to be confused with the excellent work the broker community has done these many years. ” Generally, any breach may allow the owner to treat the charter as having come to an end immediately and claim damages, or just claim damages afterwards, depending on how serious the breach is. But the owner must have suffered some sort of actual loss as a result of the breach: an upset crew may not be enough. RAISING ISSUES The MYBA Charter Agreement specifically requires the captain to raise issues with the charterer first, before the owner has a chance to terminate the contract. A failure to do this could arguably be seen as a waiver of the owner’s rights, and owners may wish to amend such standard form contracts. The Member was at pains to point out that these circumstances are unusual, commenting, “I have been chartering my yachts for more than 15 years and have maintained an excellent relationship with brokers and charterers. In fact, my yachts are considered some of the most successful yachts on the charter market. What has occurred is certainly an aberration and not to be confused with the excellent work the broker community has done these many years.” DON’T BE PUT OFF For all the pitfalls and hurdles, chartering can substantially offset the costs associated with the ownership of large yachts – with the right guidance and support. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about How to Charter Out Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about How to Charter Out

The automatic identification system (AIS) is a tracking system that establishes the positions of ships, and fixed and floating objects, in real time. Used as a navigational aid, it also lets the world see a yacht’s position - which isn’t always what we owners want. There are times when ‘going dark’ is allowed and times when it’s not. Home Handbook Managing / / Going Dark 28 November 2022 Last revised minutes 4 Reading time The automatic identification system (AIS) is a tracking system that establishes the positions of ships, and fixed and floating objects, in real time. Used as a navigational aid, it also lets the world see a yacht’s position - which isn’t always what we owners want. There are times when ‘going dark’ is allowed and times when it’s not. minutes 4 Reading time 28 November 2022 Last revised The automatic identification system (AIS) is a tracking system that establishes the positions of ships, and fixed and floating objects, in real time. Used as a navigational aid, it also lets the world see a yacht’s position - which isn’t always what we owners want. There are times when ‘going dark’ is allowed and times when it’s not. The Automatic Identification System (AIS) enhances safety and security by providing positional information and supplementing radar for traffic situation awareness. AIS is used in search and rescue operations, providing accurate information on the position of survival craft. It automates mandatory ship reporting to port authorities or vessel traffic service stations. Ships over 300 gross tonnage engaged in international voyages are required by SOLAS regulations to be fitted with Class A AIS equipment. Local regulations may be significantly more stringent. Yachts not subject to SOLAS requirements can carry Class B AIS devices. AIS systems consist of a small box with VHF transmitters, receivers, and a central processing unit, connected to various shipborne sensors and navigation systems. It transmits static information, dynamic information updated from ship sensors, and voyage-related information. AIS should not be solely relied upon for collision avoidance and does not replace radar target-tracking. It can be switched off under certain circumstances, but the master should report it to the competent authority and restart it when the source of danger has disappeared. Failure to operate AIS may lead to penalties by port state authorities and insurance underwriters may claim the vessel was unseaworthy in case of a collision without AIS. AIS systems consist of a small box with VHF transmitters, receivers, and a central processing unit, connected to various shipborne sensors and navigation systems. It transmits static information, dynamic information updated from ship sensors, and voyage-related information. AIS should not be solely relied upon for collision avoidance and does not replace radar target-tracking. It can be switched off under certain circumstances, but the master should report it to the competent authority and restart it when the source of danger has disappeared. Failure to operate AIS may lead to penalties by port state authorities and insurance underwriters may claim the vessel was unseaworthy in case of a collision without AIS. The Automatic Identification System (AIS) enhances safety and security by providing positional information and supplementing radar for traffic situation awareness. AIS is used in search and rescue operations, providing accurate information on the position of survival craft. It automates mandatory ship reporting to port authorities or vessel traffic service stations. Ships over 300 gross tonnage engaged in international voyages are required by SOLAS regulations to be fitted with Class A AIS equipment. Local regulations may be significantly more stringent. Yachts not subject to SOLAS requirements can carry Class B AIS devices. AIS enhances safety and security in various ways. By plotting positional information provided by nearby vessels, it supplements the picture produced by radar, so enhancing traffic situation awareness. Many of the problems common to radar, such as clutter, target swap as ships pass close by and target loss following a fast manoeuvre, do not affect AIS. AIS is also used in search and rescue operations. Search And Rescue operators, on land, at sea and in the air, get more accurate information, especially on the position of survival craft. Further, because AIS is used to exchange data ship-to-ship and with shore-based facilities, it is useful in automating mandatory ship reporting to port authorities or vessel traffic service (VTS) stations. LEGAL REQUIREMENT By virtue of Regulation 19 of Chapter V of the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) 1974, as amended, all ships of 300 gross tonnage or more and engaged on international voyages must be fitted with Class A AIS equipment. In law, all yachts are ships – and it is irrelevant whether registered as a private or commercial vessel. Class B devices may be carried on yachts which are not subject to the SOLAS requirements. Certain national laws take this further. For example, US Federal law requires commercial vessels of just 65 feet and over to be fitted with a Class A AIS device. HOW IT WORKS The system is contained within a small box, containing one very high frequency (VHF) radio transmitter, various VHF receivers and a central processing unit. To this is attached antennae, and interfaces for heading, speed devices and other shipborne sensors, plus interfaces to radar, Automatic Radar Plotting Aids (ARPA), Electronic Chart System/Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECS/ECDIS) and Integrated Navigation Systems (INS). There’s also a display and keyboard to input and retrieve data. The AIS can be connected either to an additional dedicated AIS display unit, possibly one with a large graphic display, or as an input to existing navigational system devices such as a radar display, ECS, ECDIS, or INS. INFORMATION SHARED The AIS information is transmitted continuously by a ship, and includes the following three types: Static information, which is entered into the AIS on installation and need only be changed if the ship changes its name, Maritime Mobile Service Identity (MMSI), location of the electronic position fixing system (EPFS) antenna, or undergoes a major conversion from one ship type to another; Dynamic information, which, apart from navigational status information, is automatically updated from the ship sensors connected to AIS; and Voyage-related information, some of which such as destination and estimated time of arrival (ETA) will need to be entered manually at the start of the voyage and kept up to date as necessary. INCOMPLETE PICTURE AIS doesn’t always give the complete picture, and – as with any navigational aid – should only be used by itself – especially for collision-avoidance. It doesn’t take the place of radar target-tracking. The officer of the watch (OOW) should always be aware that other ships, in particular smaller leisure craft, fishing boats and warships might not be fitted with AIS. The OOW should always be aware that AIS fitted on other ships as a mandatory carriage requirement might, under certain circumstances, be switched off on the master's professional judgement. SWITCHING OFF Details of yachts whose AIS is switched on maybe accessed by anyone, anywhere, simply by looking at MarineTraffic , VesselFinder or any of the other myriad of similar websites. Not all owners will be happy about this. According to the International Maritime Organisation’s Resolution A.1106(29) of 14 December 2015, entitled Revised Guidelines for The Onboard Operational Use of Shipborne Automatic Identification Systems (AIS): AIS should always be in operation when ships are underway or at anchor. If the master believes that the continual operation of AIS might compromise the safety or security of his/her ship or where security incidents are imminent, the AIS may be switched off. Unless it would further compromise the safety or security, if the ship is operating in a mandatory ship reporting system, the master should report this action and the reason for doing so to the competent authority. Actions of this nature should always be recorded in the ship's logbook together with the reason for doing so. The master should however restart the AIS as soon as the source of danger has disappeared. If the AIS is shut down, static data and voyage-related information remains stored. Restart is done by switching on the power to the AIS unit. Ship's own data will be transmitted after a two-minute initialization period. In ports AIS operation should be in accordance with port requirements. CONSEQUENCES Port state authorities will expect AIS to be operational, and may impose penalties for this not being the case – especially where there is a collision which AIS may have helped to avoid. Keep in mind, too, that non-compliance with more stringent local regulations will be punished . Even in international waters, where a yacht goes dark other than allowed by Resolution A.1106(29), while this may not be noticed by the flag state authority, if there’s a collision then insurance underwriters could claim that, without this important navigational aid working, the vessel was, in law, unseaworthy, and they are entitled to refuse payment. But going dark may not be intentional. Interference, weak radio signals and patchy satellite reception can all compromise AIS data exchange. Distinguishing intentional from unintentional signal drop-outs is difficult but not impossible. The frequency and regularity of drop-outs prior to a full blackout may be indicative. And the reason may not be malevolent. It is known, for example, that in certain parts of the world fishing vessels switch off AIS in order not to reveal productive catch areas to competitors. CONCLUSION Whether we, as owners, like it or not, AIS is governed by international convention – and it’s here to stay. If there are legitimate concerns then going dark may be permissible, but it’s as well to discuss this with the captain and insurance underwriter well in advance of a transit through waters in which it may be prudent or desirable. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about State Yachts Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about State Yachts

Unavailable at present Latest Position New Horizons Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 62 m Length Builder & Co Builder 2009 Build year 700 Gross tonnage Cayman Islands Registry Particulars Result

Unavailable at present Latest Position Wright A Way & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 54 m Length Builder & Co Builder 2010 Build year 790 Gross tonnage Cyprus Registry Particulars Illustration

Obtaining a reference for a candidate makes a lot of sense, especially in the yachting sector where standards of service are so subjective. There is a common misunderstanding among shoreside employers that they are only allowed to confirm dates of employment and role(s). This is incorrect. You may be obliged to provide one, and refences for captains and crew are commonly sought and given in any event. But care must be taken when providing them. Home Handbook Employing / / Oh Referee! 1 March 2024 Last revised minutes 7 Reading time Obtaining a reference for a candidate makes a lot of sense, especially in the yachting sector where standards of service are so subjective. There is a common misunderstanding among shoreside employers that they are only allowed to confirm dates of employment and role(s). This is incorrect. You may be obliged to provide one, and refences for captains and crew are commonly sought and given in any event. But care must be taken when providing them. minutes 7 Reading time 1 March 2024 Last revised Obtaining a reference for a candidate makes a lot of sense, especially in the yachting sector where standards of service are so subjective. There is a common misunderstanding among shoreside employers that they are only allowed to confirm dates of employment and role(s). This is incorrect. You may be obliged to provide one, and refences for captains and crew are commonly sought and given in any event. But care must be taken when providing them. Employers commonly make job offers contingent upon satisfactory references, which should be explicitly stated in the offer letter. Employers may be obligated to provide subjective references if it's customary in their industry or contractually specified. Not providing references could lead to claims of discrimination or breach of trust. References can come from individuals or corporate entities and can be either written or oral. Using third-party services like Superyacht References is recommended. Employers should ensure accuracy, fairness, and compliance with data protection laws when providing references. Policies should be established and adhered to. References should include employment duration, roles, and may cover performance, disciplinary history, and reasons for departure. Comments on suitability must be based on first-hand experience only. Employers have a duty to provide accurate and impartial references. Negligent misstatement and defamation risks exist, so references should be substantiated and labelled as private and confidential. Providing references involves handling personal data, necessitating compliance with data protection regulations. Guidance on this should be sought. Employers should disclose poor disciplinary records and ongoing proceedings in references to avoid liability for providing misleading information. Employers often include disclaimers of liability in references, though they don't absolve liability for fraud or deceit by the provider. Employers should establish clear policies on who can provide references, permissible content, and record-keeping requirements. Having template references attached to policies is recommended. Employers have a duty to provide accurate and impartial references. Negligent misstatement and defamation risks exist, so references should be substantiated and labelled as private and confidential. Providing references involves handling personal data, necessitating compliance with data protection regulations. Guidance on this should be sought. Employers should disclose poor disciplinary records and ongoing proceedings in references to avoid liability for providing misleading information. Employers often include disclaimers of liability in references, though they don't absolve liability for fraud or deceit by the provider. Employers should establish clear policies on who can provide references, permissible content, and record-keeping requirements. Having template references attached to policies is recommended. Employers commonly make job offers contingent upon satisfactory references, which should be explicitly stated in the offer letter. Employers may be obligated to provide subjective references if it's customary in their industry or contractually specified. Not providing references could lead to claims of discrimination or breach of trust. References can come from individuals or corporate entities and can be either written or oral. Using third-party services like Superyacht References is recommended. Employers should ensure accuracy, fairness, and compliance with data protection laws when providing references. Policies should be established and adhered to. References should include employment duration, roles, and may cover performance, disciplinary history, and reasons for departure. Comments on suitability must be based on first-hand experience only. It makes sense to make any offer of employment conditional upon obtaining satisfactory references. For the avoidance of doubt, this should be phrased in the job offer letter as being acceptable to the employer and not just satisfactory in a general sense. References can be given either personally or on behalf of the employer, and may be written or oral. But take care. It has been known, for example, for candidates just to give the telephone number of a friend who poses as the captain of a current or previous yacht, so it’s wise to engage an independent third party such as Superyacht References . MUST YOU PROVIDE A REFERENCE? As a present or former employer, you can be obliged to provide a subjective reference (beyond confirming dates of employment and role(s)) if there is an express obligation to do so in the employment contract, or because it’s customary in a particular industry – and is, therefore, an implied contractual term. It is, of course, very much the custom for yacht captains and departmental heads to provide references. Indeed, it’s poor form in yachting not to do so, and a refusal can be bad for a captain and/or boat’s reputation. If it’s going to be your policy, as employer, not to provide subjective references, then you should make this your formal policy, and stick to it, to avoid potential claims of discrimination or breach of the implied trust and confidence. In particular, if an employee (or former employee) has previously initiated discrimination proceedings against the employer, or alleges unlawful discrimination, a refusal to furnish a reference could lead to an additional claim of victimisation. 10 PRACTICAL TIPS ON GIVING A REFERENCE When furnishing a reference, you, as an employer, should ensure that: No statements are inaccurate The reference offers a fair overview but does not need to include every detail The reference does not convey a misleading impression The reference does not unfairly portray the subject in a negative light The subject is informed of any complaints or performance issues referred to Information regarding absence adheres to the employer's data protection obligations Comments on performance or absence abide by disability discrimination law The reference is marked as being private and confidential and for the addressee only Your policies on the subject are adhered to If providing just dates and job roles, your policy of only providing this should be referred to REFERENCE CONTENTS A reference should always set out the duration of employment and specific role(s) undertaken. The reference may also encompass other matters, such as performance, disciplinary history, perceptions of attitude and integrity, punctuality and the reason for departure. Any comments on suitability for a new role must always be – expressly – restricted to first-hand experience only. If the employee was dismissed, then this should be outlined accurately, as a favourable reference may weaken an employer's defence against an unfair dismissal claim. Maintaining consistency in providing references to different employees is vital to mitigate any allegations of discrimination or victimisation. GENERAL DUTIES When providing a reference, you (in reality, of course, your captain or head of department) must exercise reasonable care to ensure that the information provided is accurate and impartial, and does not create a false impression. There is no requirement for references to contain extensive details or be exhaustive in scope. Particular care must be taken when remarking on performance or sickness, as these could lead to a claim for disability discrimination. Employers bear legal responsibility for the content of corporate references since they are provided on the employer's behalf. So it's advisable to establish a [policy] outlining who can provide references, and the permissible content. The legal implications remain the same whether the reference is given verbally or in writing. NEGLIGENT MISSTATEMENT A referee can face legal action for negligent misstatement if it provides an inaccurate reference. Essentially, employers providing references must exercise reasonable care in their preparation. Failure to do so could render the employer liable if the employee suffers harm due to the reference. In particular, opinions expressed in the reference must be supported by the facts. DEFAMATION A false statement that damages a person's reputation in the eyes of reasonable members of society could constitute defamation – either in the form of a libel (if written) or slander (if oral). As long as the employer believed the reference to be accurate, and provided without malice, the claim for defamation won’t get far. Referees should therefore substantiate their comments where possible, demonstrating their truthfulness or honest belief in their accuracy. Further protection can be provided by labelling references " Private and Confidential " and " for the addressee only ". MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD An employee could also pursue a claim for malicious falsehood against a referee if he or she can demonstrate that the reference includes false statements published with malice (meaning the maker knew the statements were false or showed reckless disregard for their truth). While defamation safeguards reputation, malicious falsehood safeguards economic interests. LIABILITY TO THE RECIPIENT It’s easy to provide a polite, even glowing reference – especially in respect of a colleague and friend with whom the provider has spent many months together in the confines of a yacht. But risks can arise from an employer, especially through the agency of a captain or departmental head, providing an excessively positive reference. Previous employers automatically owe a duty of care to the recipient of the reference, to make sure that it is accurate. A well-worded disclaimer should be added just in case of any inaccuracies. DATA PROTECTION Providing a reference typically means handling personal data, and those involved must abide by the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018. Guidance for employers is provided in the (outdated, but still useful) Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) Employment Practices Code . Helpfully, Part two of the Code provides recommendations for employers issuing references, including establishing and communicating a clear policy regarding who can provide corporate references and under what circumstances. The Code advises against providing confidential references about an employee unless their explicit consent is obtained. It is vital to maintain the security of references and securely dispose of them when an employee leaves the organization, unless retention is required by law. DISCIPLINARY MATTERS It’s always going to be a contentious area, but it’s clear from cases on the point that have reached court that employers should disclose a poor disciplinary record, and details of any ongoing disciplinary proceedings, or risk being liable for providing a misleading reference. Unresolved disciplinary issues should also be mentioned, as not to do so could mean providing an incomplete picture. Adding a disclaimer is advisable. DISCLAIMERS It's customary for employers to add a disclaimer of liability – often specifically in respect of any negligent misstatement. This is usually effective as far as liability to the recipient is concerned, and is well worth adding, but it must such a disclaimer wouldn't absolve liability for fraud or deceit, meaning the employer cannot knowingly or recklessly make false statements. POLICIES Finally, employers ought to establish a well-defined written reference policy, outlining Which individuals are authorised to provide references; How references may be provided (in particular whether oral references may be given); The permissible content; and Any prohibited content. Having a template reference annexed to the policy is a useful further measure, and there should also be an obligation for records to be kept of oral references provided. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Commission or Kickback? Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Commission or Kickback?

So you have your team in place. In the case of a full custom yacht, you'll now have your design and specification to hand. And if it’s a semi-custom or series production yacht you’re going for, your team understands your vision and is ready to review, negotiate and modify the builders’ pre-existing designs and specifications. It’s time to shortlist the builders. Home Handbook Building / / Engage a Builder 10 May 2023 Last revised minutes 3 Reading time So you have your team in place. In the case of a full custom yacht, you have your design and specification to hand. And if it’s a semi-custom or series production yacht you’re going for, your team understands your vision and is ready to review, negotiate and modify the builders’ pre-existing designs and specifications. It’s time to shortlist the builders. minutes 3 Reading time 10 May 2023 Last revised So you have your team in place. In the case of a full custom yacht, you have your design and specification to hand. And if it’s a semi-custom or series production yacht you’re going for, your team understands your vision and is ready to review, negotiate and modify the builders’ pre-existing designs and specifications. It’s time to shortlist the builders. The asking prices of yachts depend on builder pedigree and size, with Northern Europe, France, Italy, and Turkey being viewed as having higher pedigree. Builders often subcontract parts of builds to suppliers, so effective build agreements and project management are crucial. Whittle down the short-list of builders by checking their available build slots and assessing their insurances and financial stability. Visit the builder's facilities to evaluate their cleanliness, safety, and organization, as well as the quality of their craftsmen and office facilities. Assess the builder's management team for communication and receptiveness to new concepts, as well as their flexibility in equipment suppliers and subcontractors. Consider the builder's financial security and willingness to have the build agreement subject to English law and jurisdiction. Choose a builder based on factors beyond the lowest bid, such as personal impression and team performance. Builders often request a Letter of Intent (LOI) before reserving a build slot, which outlines the price, payment terms, design, specification, and delivery timeframe. Clarify which parts of the LOI are binding and split it into a binding and non-binding section if necessary. Negotiate the build agreement after securing the LOI, taking legal advice before agreeing to any terms. Consider the builder's financial security and willingness to have the build agreement subject to English law and jurisdiction. Choose a builder based on factors beyond the lowest bid, such as personal impression and team performance. Builders often request a Letter of Intent (LOI) before reserving a build slot, which outlines the price, payment terms, design, specification, and delivery timeframe. Clarify which parts of the LOI are binding and split it into a binding and non-binding section if necessary. Negotiate the build agreement after securing the LOI, taking legal advice before agreeing to any terms. The asking prices of yachts depend on builder pedigree and size, with Northern Europe, France, Italy, and Turkey being viewed as having higher pedigree. Builders often subcontract parts of builds to suppliers, so effective build agreements and project management are crucial. Whittle down the short-list of builders by checking their available build slots and assessing their insurances and financial stability. Visit the builder's facilities to evaluate their cleanliness, safety, and organization, as well as the quality of their craftsmen and office facilities. Assess the builder's management team for communication and receptiveness to new concepts, as well as their flexibility in equipment suppliers and subcontractors. As your broker will have told you – or as you’ll have worked out by browsing online listings – the asking prices of yachts are dependent on builder pedigree as well as size. Broadly, builders in Northern Europe tend to be viewed as having the highest pedigree, followed by France and Italy and then Turkey. But this is much about perception than anything else. The reality is that many parts of the builds are subcontracted to suppliers who can place teams into any yard you wish. What’s key is an effective build agreement and project management. The use of well-known exterior and interior designers can add kudos and value. You’ll soon establish where your project can built. ASSESS THE CANDIDATES The short-list can be whittled down by making inquiries and establishing at the outset which of these builders have build slots available which suit your time horizon. The next task is to establish that the builder has the correct insurances and place and a strong balance sheet. A build taken on which was too ambitious or priced too keenly can quickly turn a prestigious name into a financial basket case. Some information will be publicly available, or an NDA can be put in place to allow you to examine more sensitive details. You should obtain a credit reference if possible. Then you should visit the builder in person. Modern yacht-building facilities are clean, safe, well-lit and orderly. Owners’ teams should have excellent office facilities, and there should be secure areas where owner-supplied items are clearly marked and stored. The workers are well-paid and highly-skilled craftsmen and women. It is (or should be) a far cry from many commercial and military shipyards. By meeting the builder’s management team, you can get a feel for their communicativeness, and their receptiveness to any new concepts you have in mind. You also need to assess the degree to which they are wedded to certain equipment suppliers and subcontractors in case you're considering alternatives. The builder will need to provide the right financial security and be open to having the build agreement subject to English law and jurisdiction: if it came to it, would you really receive justice in the builder’s local courts? You may well choose the builder you liked the look of, or whose team impressed you, over the one which came in with the lowest bid. RESERVE A SLOT It’s common practice for builders to request a Letter of Intent (LOI) from a prospective buyer before they’ll reserve a build slot. This stage is half-way between an informal expression of interest and a build agreement. The term is often used, but parties can be at odds about what the LOI means in practice and, in particular, the extent to which it’s going to bind the parties. As with many contracts in the international maritime sphere, the uncontroversial default choice of law for LOIs is that of England. Insistence on local laws should ring alarm bells. Under English law, contracts must be certain. Agreements to agree, and to negotiate in good faith, are unenforceable as they’re uncertain. The LOI can, and should, set out the price and payment terms, the design and specification, and the delivery timeframe. You may also want the right of first refusal for any earlier slots which become available. Depending on how these are drafted, each of these elements may or may not be binding. Different builders may have different expectations, but there is no overall consensus on this. The parties need to be clear on which parts are binding, and may be helpful to split the LOI into a binding and non-binding section. The degree to which you obtain certainty, while still retaining the flexibility to change or cancel the slot, is a matter of negotiation. Money may or may not change hands. If you haven’t had the owning company incorporated, the builder may want the LOI to be in your name personally. Whether you accede to such request is, of course, up to you, but the LOI must then contain a right for you to assign your interest over to the company upon incorporation. Never agree to an LOI before taking legal advice. With the LOI in place, it’s time to negotiate the build agreement . Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about The Build Agreement Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about The Build Agreement

Unavailable at present Latest Position Rapid Brokers Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 22 m Length Placeholder Yards Builder 2005 Build year 56 Gross tonnage British Virgin Islands Registry Particulars Innovation

Life’s short: build a yacht. Seems simple enough. For some, only new will do. But building a large yacht is a complicated process, the result of which is a complex series of systems, which need to work reliably, and in harmony. With the right guidance, the process is an exciting and satisfying journey. If you’re not already a Member, your first step's to contact us so we can help you find the right people. Home Handbook Building / / Build Your Team 10 May 2023 Last revised minutes 4 Reading time Life’s short: build a yacht. Seems simple enough. For some, only new will do. But building a large yacht is a complicated process, the result of which is a complex series of systems, which need to work reliably, and in harmony. With the right guidance, the process is an exciting and satisfying journey. If you’re not already a Member, your first step's to contact us so we can help you find the right people. minutes 4 Reading time 10 May 2023 Last revised Life’s short: build a yacht. Seems simple enough. For some, only new will do. But building a large yacht is a complicated process, the result of which is a complex series of systems, which need to work reliably, and in harmony. With the right guidance, the process is an exciting and satisfying journey. If you’re not already a Member, your first step's to contact us so we can help you find the right people. Exceptional projects require exceptional teams, and building a good working relationship with all team members from the start is essential. Small projects allow individuals to combine roles, especially in design. Trusted brokers with industry knowledge add value and may help in maintaining resale value. Exterior and interior designers, naval architects, and project managers are essential team members. Project managers coordinate efforts and seek compromises: some seagoing experience is helpful. Yachts are typically owned through companies for liability and privacy reasons. Cost savings can be achieved through proven hull designs and repurposing existing designs. Clear definitions of team roles, strict timescales, and engaging a lawyer with build experience are important. Project managers coordinate efforts and seek compromises: some seagoing experience is helpful. Yachts are typically owned through companies for liability and privacy reasons. Cost savings can be achieved through proven hull designs and repurposing existing designs. Clear definitions of team roles, strict timescales, and engaging a lawyer with build experience are important. Exceptional projects require exceptional teams, and building a good working relationship with all team members from the start is essential. Small projects allow individuals to combine roles, especially in design. Trusted brokers with industry knowledge add value and may help in maintaining resale value. Exterior and interior designers, naval architects, and project managers are essential team members. As with the counterparts building trading and passenger vessels, yacht builders tend to be conservative in their outlook. Why change what’s worked before? They’re also in business to make money and will look to save costs where they can – in particular by interpreting poorly-drafted build agreements to suit themselves. To a certain extent, builders’ yards are, in reality, pieces of waterside real estate where a multitude of suppliers and subcontractors come together to create the finished article. So putting the right team in place is a vital first step, whose members will advise, negotiate and integrate the efforts and wares of countless third parties. And the more exceptional the project, the more exceptional your team needs to be. All the participants need to be involved right from the start and an excellent working relationship must be built up and maintained. The smaller the project, the greater the scope for individuals to combine roles, especially when it comes to the vessel’s design. KEY TEAM MEMBERS Having decided on how and where they wish to use their yacht, a trusted broker is the best starting point for some Members. Trusted is the key word here. Brokers usually work on commission. Are they looking to build a relationship which could last many happy years, or are they just looking to complete the next deal? Good brokers will have excellent industry knowledge and will add real value. They are sounding boards for ideas, and arbiters of practicality and good taste: the latter two elements being essential in maintaining resale value. The next team members to have on board are the exterior and interior designers, plus a naval architect where a custom yacht is envisaged, and a project manager. Designers produce designs, not technical solutions. Even the most accomplished designers won’t know exactly how workable their designs are, and architects don’t always have an eye for design. So a project manager will also be needed to coordinate all their efforts, and – diplomatically – seek compromises here and there. The project manager should have recent seagoing experience, as captain or engineer, on a vessel of similar type and size. Everyone in the team – you included – need honest feedback on what is and isn’t going to work. Because yachts are sources of liability as well as being assets, and to provide privacy and make accounting easier, yachts are nearly always owned through companies. Trusts can provide an additional layer of secrecy, but keep in mind that obtaining justice can be challenging in some far-flung jurisdictions should your expectations not be met. DON’T ECONOMISE Costs can be kept down by using a proven hull design. Many builders offer semi-custom yachts, where you’ll be making mostly aesthetic choices. If you want to stand out from the crowd, commercial and even military designs can be repurposed to make striking yachts. You need to be clear on who owns the intellectual property and that you have the right to use such designs. Some team roles can be taken on by the same individual or company. Exterior and interior design can be carried out by the same person – arguably leading to more harmonious aesthetics. But trying to save costs by omitting any of the core technical skills sets can have significant adverse effects. Oversights at this first stage can require expensive modifications later, causing lengthy delays. Everyone’s remit must be clearly defined and dovetailed, with strict timescales baked-in to their service contracts. Engaging a good lawyer, with build experience, is crucial here. DESIGN ESSENTIALS A yacht’s design will be determined, in part, by the minimum technical standards dictated by the Flag State , which in turn may require your yacht to be built in compliance with classification society Rules. These are based on internationally agreed-to standards, which must be adhered to if your yacht is going to ever to sail anywhere, and without which you will find it near impossible to insure the vessel. They vary according to length, internal volume and use. But such standards do not generally cover some aspects, such as preventive maintenance, which, over time, will help support the vessel’s condition and resale value. Remove the panels of any yacht and you’ll see an array of pipes, wires and items of equipment. If it’s too difficult or time-consuming to reach such items, they can be overlooked and, eventually, fail. The result is not just you and your guests being inconvenienced. Some repairs can be disproportionately expensive, and in extreme cases this can lead to your yacht not being accepted by a buyer when it’s time to sell. With regards aesthetics, most buyers are reasonably conservative. Avant garde designs are going to look newer for longer, and this will help to maintain their value. But when futuristic tips into plain weird the resale market shrinks rapidly and cost of ownership skyrockets. THE END RESULT Playwright George Bernard Shaw once quipped that reasonable people adapt themselves to the world, while unreasonable people adapt the world to themselves – hence progress depends on unreasonable people. Challenging the innate conservativeness of builders and regulatory authorities requires an experienced, imaginative and practical team. In the case of a full custom yacht, the end result of this exciting pre-build stage should be a design and specification you’re happy with, which is ready to be put out to tender with shortlisted builders, and a team ready to oversee the build. If a semi-custom or series production yacht is your preference, the result is a team which understands your vision and is ready to review, negotiate and modify the builders’ pre-existing designs and specifications. With your team in place, it's time to chose a Flag State , and possibly a classification society , before engaging a builder . Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Choose a Flag Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Choose a Flag

Unavailable at present Latest Position Rapid Brokers Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 58 m Length Thompson Yachts Builder 2020 Build year 642 Gross tonnage United Kingdom Registry Particulars Specimen

It’s time to free ourselves from a tun of unnecessary paperwork. In this white paper, drawn up at the suggestion of, and following consultations with, some of our Members, our General Secretary considers what Gross Tonnage is, why it’s used as the primary regulatory threshold, and what workarounds could be utilised to circumvent its blunt impact. Home Handbook White Papers / / Speaking Volumes Browse the website of any large brokerage and you will find numerous vessels said to have a “GT” of 499. This refers to Gross Tonnage. Owners of these are relieved from having to comply with a raft of regulations which apply to chartered vessels of 500 GT and above. Not doing so can lead to the yacht being detained and will lead to insurance policies being invalid. To be clear, this paper isn’t suggesting that the relevant safety regulations shouldn’t apply to certain larger yachts - it’s just that Gross Tonnage creates peculiar regulatory thresholds which can lead to compromised designs. Whether or not owners are looking to shave money off compliance costs, designers certainly consider there to be a market for such “paragraph” yachts. Keep in mind, also, that many such safety regulations don’t apply to private (i.e. non-chartered) yachts - even though they require the same number of permanent, full-time crewmembers. WHAT IS GROSS TONNAGE? The word ‘tonnage’ here does not mean weight. It is derived from the old English term ‘tun’ meaning a large wooden barrel – used for measuring, storing and transporting wine, oil or honey. They usually held 252 gallons, but other sizes were common. As it happens, a tun of wine weights about one long ton, which is 2240 pounds or 1016 kg, but the key point is that Gross Tonnage reflects volume – not weight, mass or displacement. Gross Tonnage is an abstract, unitless calculation, being the vessel’s total enclosed volume but modified by a logarithmic factor based on that volume. It was a compromise which met the needs of the shipping community of the 1960s. Yet these arcane rules still govern the design and specification of certain yachts over half a century later. Crucially, the figure is calculated as much as it is measured. It is defined by the Regulation 3 of Annex I of the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969 (normally abbreviated to “ITC 69”) by the formula: GT=K1V Where: V = the total volume of all enclosed spaces of the ship in cubic metres, and K1 = 0.2 + 0.02 log10V (or as set out in Appendix 2 of ITC 69) Calculating this requires a good grasp of both naval architecture and mathematics. UNDERLYING RATIONALE The reason why volume is used rather than weight is that, historically, ships were measured in order to calculate taxes. Aside from warships, all vessels were cargo ships of some description. And the easiest and fairest way to fund port operations and levy foreign trade was to tax ship owners according to cargo carrying capacity and, therefore, profitability. Overall vessel size was not the key factor. The same principles were applied to later passenger ships. Different countries used a variety of methods, which is why the ITC 69 was needed. This also did away with Gross Register(ed) Tonnage (GRT) - a measure of total internal capacity which is confused with GT even to this day – and at least ten other key measurements in use internationally. PROBLEMS CAUSED Inevitably, there is pressure on ship designers to minimise enclosed volume and reduce Gross Tonnage-based taxes and dues. Such amounts are minimal on relatively small vessels, such as yachts, but squeezing beneath a particular tonnage threshold seems to be a common aim. This can lead to freeboards (the distance between the waterline and the deck) being reduced to the minimum legal requirement. In turn, this reduces the available reserve buoyancy – those internal areas, above the waterline, which can be made watertight in the event of an emergency and help keep the vessel afloat for longer. Further, crew areas are reduced to the bare minimum in terms of floor space and headroom, and engine rooms are made as small as possible with machinery crammed in. Most pertinently for yachts, sterns tend to be cut off and slab-sided, sheer (the curving of the main deck upwards towards bow and stern) is reduced or eliminated, and swathes of the upper decks are given over to sundecks. Arguably, yachts are less elegant as a result. SHORT-TERM SOLUTION? Help could be at hand – if only more ship registry officials knew where to look. Regulation 1(3) of Annex I of ITC 69 states – arguably, in effect – that where there are “novel” aspects of a vessel’s design these aspects can be ignored when calculating Gross Tonnage. There is a small number of precedents for this in the context of trading ships, but this loophole does not appear to have been exercised when assessing yachts. This is surprising given that the latter are usually, almost by definition, full of novel features be they aesthetic elements or technical innovations. While there is Regulation 1(3) is written in vague terms, individual ship registries’ determination as to what “novel” means is definitive. Article 11 of ITC 69 makes it clear that tonnage certificates must be accepted at face value by other port states. It is perhaps surprising how this apparent loophole hasn’t been exploited more – especially by those registries marketing themselves at large yacht owners. But it would be better to change the rules than bend them. LONG-TERM SOLUTION The shortcomings of ITC 69 have been raised with the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), over the years, in respect of various types of cargo ships. Yet the convention has yet to be amended. Ship registries and owners have observed that too little or too much tonnage tax is being paid relative to other vessels of a similar displacement – depending on the point of view. The IMO’s view is that it doesn’t control tonnage tax and is unable to disallow the use of the gross tonnage in its calculation as this is a matter for individual port authorities. The most promising alternative has been mooted by the Australian government. Known informally as the “maritime real estate” and more formally as “Register Tonnage”, this is simply the length overall x breadth x summer draught. This seems fair as ports can charge ships on the basis of the amount of the port they take up, and the amount of dredging required. Yacht owners will need to work with trading ship owners in order to bring pressure to bear on the IMO. The procedure for amending the ITC 69 is particularly lengthy and involved. But surely worthwhile if yacht owners are going to put an end to this bureaucratic tail waging a very expensive dog. CONCLUSION No one system of measurement is going to satisfy all owners. ITC 69 is a compromise which has endured where numerous previous regimes have not. From a regulatory perspective, for nearly all trading and passenger vessels size doesn’t matter: all regulations will apply. And rightly so. Crew have every right to work in a safe and comfortable environment, and third parties have every right not to suffer the effects of collisions and pollution. But large, crewed yachts are different. Very few even existed when ITC 69 was drafted. Their crew live in comfortable quarters and are well paid (competition for the most able crewmembers ensures this). It can’t be right for yacht designers to be working around a figure to which vessel measurements form just one part, and which in any event attempts to satisfy the needs of a trading shipping community from a bygone era. It will be useful for Members to engage with ship registries at the outset regarding, via the Club Secretary, about Regulation 1(3) and what it could mean for the design of their yacht. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who provided perspectives for this white paper. It’s time to free ourselves from a tun of unnecessary paperwork. In this white paper, drawn up at the suggestion of, and following consultations with, some of our Members, our General Secretary considers what Gross Tonnage is, why it’s used as the primary regulatory threshold, and what workarounds could be utilised to circumvent its blunt impact. 8 February 2019 Last revised minutes 4 Reading time minutes 4 Reading time 8 February 2019 Last revised It’s time to free ourselves from a tun of unnecessary paperwork. In this white paper, drawn up at the suggestion of, and following consultations with, some of our Members, our General Secretary considers what Gross Tonnage is, why it’s used as the primary regulatory threshold, and what workarounds could be utilised to circumvent its blunt impact. Gross Tonnage (GT) is the key factor in determining which regulations apply, and this is vital to ensuring that insurance policies remain valid . GT is based on the total enclosed volume of the yacht and is derived from historical measurements used for taxation. The use of GT as a regulatory threshold can lead to compromised designs as owners and designers aim to minimize ongoing mangement costs. There is a loophole in the regulations that allows "novel" aspects of a yacht's design to be ignored when calculating GT, but this option has not been widely utilized. A potential alternative to GT is "Register Tonnage," which considers the physical dimensions of the yacht, and, as owners, perhaps we should engage with ship registries and pressure the International Maritime Organisation to change the regulations. You can also read about Down with 'Superyachts'? Questions or comments? Please contact us Join the discussion over in the Club's group You can also read about Down with 'Superyachts'? Questions or comments? Please contact us

While your yacht insurance broker should understand and be able to explain policy terms to you, there can be ambiguity as to the role played by intermediaries. If you’re going to do your utmost to make sure that you remain covered, you need to be clear about the insurance contract itself, beyond deductible amounts. Underwriters are in business to make money and, despite marketing to the contrary, can and will fight larger claims. Home Handbook Insuring / / Understanding The Contract 18 April 2023 Last revised minutes 3 Reading time While your broker should understand and be able to explain policy terms to you, there can be ambiguity as to the role played by intermediaries. If you’re going to do your utmost to make sure that you remain covered, you need to be clear about the insurance contract itself, beyond deductible amounts. Underwriters are in business to make money and, despite marketing to the contrary, can and will fight larger claims. minutes 3 Reading time 18 April 2023 Last revised While your broker should understand and be able to explain policy terms to you, there can be ambiguity as to the role played by intermediaries. If you’re going to do your utmost to make sure that you remain covered, you need to be clear about the insurance contract itself, beyond deductible amounts. Underwriters are in business to make money and, despite marketing to the contrary, can and will fight larger claims. Where there's a dispute, ambiguous terms in a policy are construed in favour of the insured . Consumer protection may vary based on whether the insured uses the yacht privately or commercially. Insurance contracts consist of four types of terms: terms descriptive of the risk, exclusions, warranties, and conditions. Breach of warranty can release the underwriter from future liability or suspend coverage, while breach of a condition can lead to liability rejection or claims for damages. Terms descriptive of the risk define the perilscovered , and the insured must prove that the loss resulted from one of these perils. Exclusions limit the scope of coverage and suspend cover during the excluded circumstances. Warranties are fundamental terms that must be strictly followed, regardless of whether they are labeled as such. Conditions can be either conditions precedent (before coverage) or bare conditions (during the policy), and breach can result in different outcomes. The insured party must have an insurable interest in the matter being insured, typically the owner of the yacht. Other interested parties must be declared in the contract and can be entitled to notifications, but to claim directly, they need to be named as joint or co-insureds. Exclusions limit the scope of coverage and suspend cover during the excluded circumstances. Warranties are fundamental terms that must be strictly followed, regardless of whether they are labeled as such. Conditions can be either conditions precedent (before coverage) or bare conditions (during the policy), and breach can result in different outcomes. The insured party must have an insurable interest in the matter being insured, typically the owner of the yacht. Other interested parties must be declared in the contract and can be entitled to notifications, but to claim directly, they need to be named as joint or co-insureds. Where there's a dispute, ambiguous terms in a policy are construed in favour of the insured . Consumer protection may vary based on whether the insured uses the yacht privately or commercially. Insurance contracts consist of four types of terms: terms descriptive of the risk, exclusions, warranties, and conditions. Breach of warranty can release the underwriter from future liability or suspend coverage, while breach of a condition can lead to liability rejection or claims for damages. Terms descriptive of the risk define the perilscovered , and the insured must prove that the loss resulted from one of these perils. Insurance contracts must set out the risk, the duration of cover, the premium and the amount payable in the event of loss. That’s it. They don’t need to be set out in any particular way. And, aside from marine insurance, they don’t even need to be in writing. The policies for larger risks can be long-winded and written in rather theatrical terms. These old-fashioned words and phrases have well-known and judicially considered meanings and implications. In recent years, there has been a move towards simpler terminology – but such words may not have been considered in court. In the event of a dispute arising between insured and underwriter, unfamiliar terms can lead to doubt. If words are ambiguous, they will be construed in favour of the insured. Whilst an owner who keeps the yacht solely for private use may be given the benefit of any doubt as a consumer, where the vessel is chartered or otherwise maintained on a commercial basis for tax reasons, this consumer protection evaporates. Where words have a technical legal meaning, this definition will prevail, as will any definitions set out in the contract. Where there are rival meanings, the construction consistent with commercial common sense will triumph. The contract will also be construed in line with the purpose of the contract, such that insuring clauses are interpreted widely, and exclusions narrowly. TYPES OF TERMS Insurance contracts contain four types of terms. It’s important to know which category a term falls into, as this affects what happens where such terms aren’t complied with. The categories are: Terms descriptive of the risk; Exceptions and exclusions; Warranties; and Conditions. For those who already know a little about general contract law, the terms ‘warranty’ and ‘condition’ are used differently. In insurance law, a breach of warranty can discharge an underwriter from all future liability, or may suspend cover for the period during which the insured is in breach, rather than merely rise to a claim for damages. Breaching a condition can give the underwriter the right to reject liability – or claim damages. TERMS DESCRIPTIVE OF THE RISK These are terms that describe the risk, and so define the cover in terms of the perils insured against. The insured must prove that its loss was caused by one of these perils. EXCEPTIONS & EXCLUSIONS Exceptions and exclusions set limits on the scope of the risk. They have the effect of suspending cover while the excluded circumstances are in effect. WARRANTIES Warranties are fundamental terms and must be strictly complied with. They may or may not labelled as such, but exist where the insured declares that something will or will not be done, or that a condition has or has not been fulfilled, or that it holds a particular intention or belief. It used to be that underwriters made all kinds of terms warranties simply by including ‘basis of contract’ clauses. This is no longer allowed, but statements as to particular facts (past or present) can still be deemed to be warranties. CONDITIONS Conditions take the form of either: A ‘condition precedent’, which requires compliance by the insured before being on-cover, and which, if breached, allows the underwriter to reject liability altogether; or A ‘bare condition’, which requires compliance by the insured during the currency of the policy, and which, if breached, allows the underwriter to claim damages for any loss suffered as a result of a breach. Examples of a condition precedent might be the payment of the premium, or compliance with claim notification requirements, while a bare condition might take the form of an obligation to give prompt notice to the underwriter of any circumstance likely to give rise to a claim, or a requirement to co-operate with the underwriter in respect to a claim. Either way, the underwriter bears the burden of proving that a condition has been breached. And labelling a condition as such is not conclusive as to its status. INSURABLE INTEREST It may sound obvious, but the party taking out the insurance must be the owner of the yacht – not the beneficial owner. Otherwise, in law, the beneficial owner would merely be taking a bet. The insured is said to need to have an ‘insurable interest’ in the matter being insured. Other parties may have an interest which is insurable, and this must be declared in the contract. The noted party can be entitled to notification by the underwriter of changes to cover, cancellation or non-renewal. If such parties want to be able to claim directly from the underwriter, however, they need to be named either as joint or co-insureds in the policy. Joint insureds each have a contractual right to indemnity, perhaps because they both jointly own a yacht. But the wrongdoing of one joint insured can preclude a claim by the other (innocent) joint insured. A co-insured, such as a mortgagor bank, is not precluded from claiming under such circumstances. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Providing Information Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Providing Information

Unavailable at present Latest Position Yachts & More Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 46 m Length Placeholder Yards Builder 2016 Build year 499 Gross tonnage Cayman Islands Registry Particulars Exemplar

Superyacht owners have a collective worth greater than the annual GDP of Sweden. They are influencers in the truest sense. And now you can reach out to them and their gatekeepers through a platform which is independent and respected. Home About Advertise / / A Wealth of Opportunity The global fleet over 30 metres in length consisted of 5,396 superyachts in operation at the start of 2022 ... The total average final asking price for all used yachts sold, went up in 2021 to €11.8 million. The State of Yachting 2022 REACH THE GLOBAL ELITE Get In Touch Our Members are, by definition, some of the wealthiest people in the world. Working on the widely-accepted Ten Percent Rule, large yacht owners are together worth €637bn.* Which is slightly more than the annual GDP of, say, Sweden.* They are influencers in the truest sense. And now you can reach out to them and their gatekeepers through a platform which is independent and respected. *Sources: SuperYacht Times, The State of Yachting 2022, €(11.8m average value x 10 x 5,396 units), International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook Database, April 2024 No Conflicts of Interest Contact Us Transparency and impartiality being central to the Club’s ethos and success, we will welcome advertising and sponsorship in this, our new website. We are not, however, a yachting media outlet and do not rely on advertising revenue. There are plenty of such platforms, and they do a great job. But we’re exclusively on the side of owners. In order to avoid any conflicts of interest, we cannot carry advertising in respect of yachts, or yachting products or services. If you’d like to explore promoting your non-marine business, please get in touch.

Unavailable at present Latest Position Example Brokerage & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 33 m Length Finest Craft Builder 1937 Build year 116 Gross tonnage United Kingdom Registry Particulars Paragon

Unavailable at present Latest Position Example Brokerage & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 37 m Length Finest Craft Builder 2011 Build year 156 Gross tonnage Cayman Islands Registry Particulars Type

While adherence to classification society Rules is often mandatory, don’t think of these organisations as being there to impose health and safety restrictions and add to an already considerable mound of paperwork. They have their limitations, but they are useful sources of technical knowhow, and their experts can add real value to your build. Home Handbook Building / / Keep it Classy 10 May 2023 Last revised minutes 3 Reading time While adherence to classification society Rules is often mandatory, don’t think of these organisations as being there to impose health and safety restrictions and add to an already considerable mound of paperwork. They have their limitations, but they are useful sources of technical knowhow, and their experts can add real value to your build. minutes 3 Reading time 10 May 2023 Last revised While adherence to classification society Rules is often mandatory, don’t think of these organisations as being there to impose health and safety restrictions and add to an already considerable mound of paperwork. They have their limitations, but they are useful sources of technical knowhow, and their experts can add real value to your build. Classification societies establish and apply standards (Rules) for design, construction, and maintenance of yachts, focusing on technical aspects. Building and keeping a yacht in Class can boost resale value and ensure compliance with Flag State requirements and insurance policies. Classification societies can provide additional consultancy services during builds and refits, assisting with design development. The connection between classification and insurance dates back to the 17th century, with societies like Lloyd's Register providing vessel information to underwriters. The leading classification societies are members of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS), which aids in developing regulations. Societies have limitations, including their focus on physical aspects and potential reliance on sampling instead of full examinations due to their experience with larger ships. Claims against societies for mistakes during the build or regular surveys can be challenging due to the choice of law, historical links to specific countries, and liability exclusions in the agreement. When choosing a society, consider membership in IACS, acceptance by insurance underwriters, openness to new ideas, and a deep understanding of large yachts. Establish a good working relationship with the society's surveyor, considering them as an integral part of the build team. Classification does not guarantee build quality or vessel maintenance; it primarily focuses on technical compliance. Societies have limitations, including their focus on physical aspects and potential reliance on sampling instead of full examinations due to their experience with larger ships. Claims against societies for mistakes during the build or regular surveys can be challenging due to the choice of law, historical links to specific countries, and liability exclusions in the agreement. When choosing a society, consider membership in IACS, acceptance by insurance underwriters, openness to new ideas, and a deep understanding of large yachts. Establish a good working relationship with the society's surveyor, considering them as an integral part of the build team. Classification does not guarantee build quality or vessel maintenance; it primarily focuses on technical compliance. Classification societies establish and apply standards (Rules) for design, construction, and maintenance of yachts, focusing on technical aspects. Building and keeping a yacht in Class can boost resale value and ensure compliance with Flag State requirements and insurance policies. Classification societies can provide additional consultancy services during builds and refits, assisting with design development. The connection between classification and insurance dates back to the 17th century, with societies like Lloyd's Register providing vessel information to underwriters. The leading classification societies are members of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS), which aids in developing regulations. Classification societies (sometimes known just as ‘Class’) are privately-organised groups of engineers and surveyors. They are experts in the technical aspects of yacht construction and maintenance. Their principal role is to research, establish and apply standards (known as ‘Rules’) for design, building and maintenance. The Rules are highly detailed, covering the integrity of the hull, machinery and key safety systems. Depending on your yacht’s size, and whether it’s going to be chartered-out, your chosen Flag State, may require the vessel to be built according to Rules, and, on launching, be kept ‘in Class’. Societies also offer additional consultancy services, going beyond basic classification, during builds and refits. Building to Rules and keeping your yacht in Class can boost the resale value whether or not it is chartered. Where must, as a matter of law, be kept in class, then failing to do so may invalidate insurance policies. Even before the build agreement is signed, the society can review the proposed plans, and in particular any novel features or materials. As well as assessing Rule compliance, they can assist with design development – in a relatively cost-effective way, too. CLASS & INSURANCE The connection between classification and insurance goes back a long way. The oldest society, Lloyd's Register , was named after a 17th-century London coffee house that was frequented by merchants, ship owners and insurance underwriters. Keen to encourage patrons to stay longer, coffee house owner, Edward Lloyd, printed and circulated industry news. The customers set up the Society for the Registry of Shipping in 1760, with the aim of recording information about vessel quality, thereby enabling the underwriters to make more informed decisions about risk. The records were listed, rated and classed in the Society’s Register Book. Subscriptions generated by the Register Book paid for surveyors to examine the vessels. Today, the leading 11 societies are all members of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) - a non-governmental organization covering over 90% of the world’s shipping tonnage. IACS is a non-governmental organization, which helps the International Maritime Organization to develop regulations. LIMITATIONS Societies have two principal limitations. Firstly, they only consider the physical aspects of the yacht and its equipment, not how they are used. Secondly, because they are more used to examining ships ten times the volume of even the largest yachts, there can be a reliance on sampling rather than full examinations: things can be missed. Classification doesn’t automatically assure build quality or vessel maintenance. LIABILITY Society surveyors are human and make mistakes. An owner might want to claim against a society where there has been a mistake made during the build process. More common are omissions made during the regular surveys, especially where the maintenance of the yacht ‘in Class’ is a reason underpinning a purchase. The latter may be an important route to getting compensation, given that the societies are large organisations with deep pockets, whereas the seller is often just an owning company with no other assets once the vessel is sold. What makes claims against societies difficult is that while commercial parties often automatically choose English law, the societies all have historical links to particular countries, and often insist on the law of their ‘home’ country. Further, there are still no international conventions on this subject, despite some initiatives. The choice of law is normally agreed in the contract, of course, but this may not automatically be respected by certain courts, and such a choice may be meaningless to third party buyer who was not party to original contract for classification services. Societies will, where possible, expressly exclude their own liability in the terms of the agreement with the owner. These attempts have largely been upheld. Amazingly, terms will commonly state, for example, that the society ‘does not warrant the accuracy of any information or advice supplied…’ and ‘…will not be liable for any … act, omission, error, negligence, or … any inaccuracy in any information or advice given’. Indeed, the society may also state if there has been negligence on their part, then they will compensate the owner, but only up to the amount of the society’s fees paid – which will usually be a fraction of the damages sought. CHOICE OF SOCIETY You should choose a society which: Is a member of IACS, Is acceptable to the proposed insurance underwriter, Is receptive to new ideas and solutions, and Really understands large yachts. The last point is particularly important where your build includes novel designs or materials. Much can be at the discretion of the society’s surveyor, so a good working relationship is vital. Think of the surveyor as an integral part of your build team. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Engage a Builder Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Engage a Builder

Unavailable at present Latest Position Superyachts'R'Us Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 33 m Length DMS & Co Builder 2017 Build year 350 Gross tonnage Malta Registry Particulars Display

Compliance with the more obscure flag state regulations and local laws can sometimes seem like unnecessary hassle and expense. Yet if you, as a yacht owner, are to remain protected in the event of an accident, investing in detailed compliance may be money well spent. You also need to keep lines of communication with your insurance broker open. Home Handbook Insuring / / Staying Covered 10 May 2023 Last revised minutes 6 Reading time Compliance with the more obscure flag state regulations and local laws can sometimes seem like unnecessary hassle and expense. Yet if you, as owner, are to remain protected in the event of an accident, investing in detailed compliance may be money well spent. You also need to keep lines of communication with your insurance broker open. minutes 6 Reading time 10 May 2023 Last revised Compliance with the more obscure flag state regulations and local laws can sometimes seem like unnecessary hassle and expense. Yet if you, as owner, are to remain protected in the event of an accident, investing in detailed compliance may be money well spent. You also need to keep lines of communication with your insurance broker open. Warranties are requirements that must be fulfilled by the policyholder to manage risk in insurance situations. Breach of warranty no longer automatically avoids all liability for underwriters since 2016. Underwriters remain liable for losses occurring after a breach of warranty if it can be remedied. If a loss occurs while the insured is in breach of warranty and the breach increases the risk, underwriters can deny liability. Breach of warranty regarding past facts may permanently suspend the underwriter's liability. Identifying warranties in a policy is crucial as they can be expressed or implied by law. Popular policy forms include warranties related to the purpose of use, navigation limits, vessel control, etc. The warranty of legality is an important implied warranty that covers lawful adventures and lawful usage of the yacht. Seaworthiness may not be explicitly required in policies, but it can impact coverage and claims. Sensible precautions, such as using approved charter agreements and verifying crew qualifications, are recommended to ensure coverage and compliance with laws and regulations. Identifying warranties in a policy is crucial as they can be expressed or implied by law. Popular policy forms include warranties related to the purpose of use, navigation limits, vessel control, etc. The warranty of legality is an important implied warranty that covers lawful adventures and lawful usage of the yacht. Seaworthiness may not be explicitly required in policies, but it can impact coverage and claims. Sensible precautions, such as using approved charter agreements and verifying crew qualifications, are recommended to ensure coverage and compliance with laws and regulations. Warranties are requirements that must be fulfilled by the policyholder to manage risk in insurance situations. Breach of warranty no longer automatically avoids all liability for underwriters since 2016. Underwriters remain liable for losses occurring after a breach of warranty if it can be remedied. If a loss occurs while the insured is in breach of warranty and the breach increases the risk, underwriters can deny liability. Breach of warranty regarding past facts may permanently suspend the underwriter's liability. Warranties serve to manage risk in various situations. They are requirements that need to be fulfilled by the policyholder. Warranties can be promissory, where the policyholder commits to a specific action or condition, or they can affirm or deny the existence of certain facts. Simply labelling a term as a warranty is insufficient, and the courts will consider the parties' intentions as well. They can be set out in the policy, or are implied by law – for example that the yacht will be used for lawful purposes, and operated in a lawful manner. BREACHES OF WARRANTY Since 2016, the old ‘basis of the contract’ clauses have been abolished. This means that underwriters cannot automatically avoid all liability if an express warranty is breached. The underwriter is liable for losses that occurred before a breach of warranty – as was always the case. But now, if the breach can be remedied, the underwriter remains liable for losses that happen after the breach has been fixed. If a loss occurs while the insured is in breach of a warranty, and if (crucially) the breach actually increased the risk of the actual loss, underwriters can still deny liability. Once (if) the insured rectifies the breach before the loss happens, the insured will again be back on-cover. After a breach of a warranty, the insured is still responsible for paying the premium. However, underwriters may be cautious when demanding payment to avoid waiving their right to rely on the breach. If the breach cannot be rectified, such as a breach of warranty regarding past facts (e.g., previous insurance claims or losses), the liability of the underwriter remains permanently suspended, and the insured will not have had any cover. RECOGNISING WARRANTIES So, with such serious consequences flowing from a breach of warranty, it is vital to be able to identify what warranties apply to a policy. The trouble is that warranties can be expressed in the contract, but not actually described as a warranty. More worryingly, they can be implied automatically by law, without even having to be agreed upon. Thankfully, express warranties must at least be included in the policy, or must at least be contained in some document referred to in the policy. So in the event of a claim it wouldn’t be good enough for an underwriter to simply dust-off some previously unknown ‘standard’ terms and refuse to pay. They are normally added as a deliberate and obvious fundamental stipulation of the contract. While implied warranties cannot be found in policies, they are easy to ascertain from the UK’s Marine Insurance Act 1906, and we’ll consider the more important ones below. While it may seem narrow-minded just to look at English law, it’s worth considering that most of the world’s risks are insured on the London market, and most countries model their own insurance laws on this Act – sometimes word for word. Whereas express warranties tend to be specific, implied warranties can be overarching and vague; so there can be overlaps between them. But an express warranty will not exclude an implied warranty on a related matter, unless directly inconsistent with it. EXPRESS WARRANTIES The two most widely used policy forms, the Institute Yacht Clauses and the American Yacht Form, contain warranties that the yacht is only to be used for ‘private pleasure purposes’ and is not to be chartered unless the underwriters specifically agree. The Institute Yacht Clauses also frame agreed navigation limits and the vessel’s maximum speed as warranties. Other popular forms often demand that when the yacht is underway a competent person must be on board and in control of the vessel. In a 2006 English case, concerning a claim following a serious fire on board the motor yacht Newfoundland Explorer while she was laid up afloat in Fort Lauderdale, the court held that the phrase ‘warranted vessel fully crewed at all times’ meant that the owner had to keep at least one crew member on board the yacht 24 hours a day, subject to (i) emergencies rendering crew departure necessary, or (ii) necessary temporary departures for the purposes of performing crewing duties or related activities such as adjusting mooring lines. It wasn’t good enough to employ a captain who lived ashore 30 minutes away. History was repeated in 2008 with a fire on board another vessel, Resolute, whose crew lived nearby – and the court in that case came to the same conclusion. WARRANTY OF LEGALITY Arguably the most important warranty is not expressed, but implied. Under the UK’s Marine Insurance Act 1906 (and in the laws of many other nations) there is an implied warranty that: The ‘adventure’ (i.e. a charter or a period of use by the owner and/or crew) will be lawful; and The yacht will be used in a lawful manner – as far as the insured can control the matter. With regard to legality of the adventure, at one end of the spectrum a yacht will clearly not be covered where the owner uses it for smuggling. Problems arise where the owner has no knowledge of doing anything illegal. Illegality may stem from local law as well as the yacht’s flag state law: a yacht chartering in without a local charter licence may not be covered. One would also want to ensure that the complex US security regulations are complied with when entering their waters. As for the second part – using the yacht in a lawful manner – this is only an issue as far the owner can control it. Compliance with safety-related regulations, such as the International Safety Management (ISM) Code or the Red Ensign Group Yacht Code Large Yacht will be a prerequisite to the underwriter paying related claims. So important is the warranty of legality that breaches of it cannot be waived by a kind underwriter, neither can the parties agree to overlook it. The warranty of legality has been used to avoid payment even where the crew failed to keep a proper watch – as this was in itself a breach of international collision regulations. In one landmark case, a yard was also denied cover where fire destroyed yachts in the yard, but where the yard itself did not conform to municipal byelaws. SEAWORTHINESS As surprising as it may seem, where a policy is for a period of time (as nearly all are) rather than for a specific passage, there is no implicit requirement in law for your yacht to be maintained in a seaworthy state. While some policies overcome this by expressly obliging the owner to maintain the yacht in a seaworthy condition, some standard forms don’t. Where there’s no stated obligation to do so, the underwriter will not be liable for any losses arising from unseaworthiness if the yacht actually puts to sea in that state with the knowledge of the insured. Where, as is normally the case, the legal owner (and therefore the named insured) is an offshore company, perhaps held in trust, identifying the individual(s) with such knowledge is difficult. The managers are an obvious starting point. Whilst it is for the underwriters to prove such knowledge, not for the insured to disprove, a review of the documents and correspondence held by the ISM Code ‘designated person’ could prove fatal to the chances of a pay-out. Being in a seaworthy condition means just that: falling short, but nevertheless making every effort, will not do. Even if a policy does not insist on seaworthiness, this is likely to be examined by the underwriter in any event after a claim, as any material non-disclosure would still provide a separate route for invalidating the claim. Many flag states, in particular within the Red Ensign group, have technical Codes of Practice that apply specifically to large yachts and those which are chartered. These provide objective measures of unseaworthiness, but, whilst helpful, should not be considered as providing a complete description of what constitutes a seaworthy yacht. SENSIBLE PRECAUTIONS If you’re chartering your yacht out, underwriters may insist on the use of a charter agreement that has been specifically approved by them, or is in a standard industry format, such as that published by MYBA . Likewise, if you’re going to race your sailing yacht, you may net to provide advance notification. However you use your yacht, be sure to get written confirmation of the ongoing information needed by underwriters – and provide this clearly, verifiable and in good time. It's also vital to check that your yacht is operating in accordance with flag and port state laws, and that you have the paperwork to provide this. Check, also, that your crew have the qualifications they claim they have: there are various third parties which provide this standalone service. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Making a Claim Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Making a Claim

Unavailable at present Latest Position Example Brokerage & Co Listing Email WhatsApp +44 7773 246 246 Central Agent 80 m Length DMS & Co Builder 2006 Build year 1300 Gross tonnage Spain Registry Particulars Example

While the refitting of an older yacht may appeal to some owners, others may prefer to go a stage further and upcycle a naval or other working vessel. These often have an attractive aesthetic born of practical necessity - which can be transformed into uniquely beautiful yachts, inherently well suited to cruising in unusual locations. Home Handbook Upcycling / / Conversion Projects 8 August 2018 Last revised minutes 2 Reading time While the refitting of an older yacht may appeal to some owners, others may prefer to go a stage further and upcycle a naval or other working vessel. These often have an attractive aesthetic born of practical necessity - which can be transformed into uniquely beautiful yachts, inherently well suited to cruising in unusual locations. minutes 2 Reading time 8 August 2018 Last revised While the refitting of an older yacht may appeal to some owners, others may prefer to go a stage further and upcycle a naval or other working vessel. These often have an attractive aesthetic born of practical necessity - which can be transformed into uniquely beautiful yachts, inherently well suited to cruising in unusual locations. Some commercial and surplus military vessels can be purchased at a fraction of the price of large yachts, creating interesting opportunities. Buying directly from the seller or their appointed broker is preferable to using an intermediary, which can lead to increased costs and communication issues. Refit and repair yards, rather than builders, are more likely to undertake conversion projects, providing more choice and negotiation power for owners. Conversion projects involve combining new and old designs into a single vessel, requiring integration and compliance with evolving regulations. Interfaces between old and new elements can present challenges during and after the conversion process. Structural changes can affect the distribution of pressures and forces, potentially compromising previously sound parts of the vessel. There is a risk of unexpected costs and lost commercial opportunities during conversions, leading to compensation payments from the yard. Yacht conversions require a measured approach to ensure high-quality fit and finish. Legal and practical issues specific to conversion projects should be addressed before entering into an agreement with the yard. Converting ships to yachts is a niche business, and experienced project management is crucial to ensure high standards and attention to detail. Structural changes can affect the distribution of pressures and forces, potentially compromising previously sound parts of the vessel. There is a risk of unexpected costs and lost commercial opportunities during conversions, leading to compensation payments from the yard. Yacht conversions require a measured approach to ensure high-quality fit and finish. Legal and practical issues specific to conversion projects should be addressed before entering into an agreement with the yard. Converting ships to yachts is a niche business, and experienced project management is crucial to ensure high standards and attention to detail. Some commercial and surplus military vessels can be purchased at a fraction of the price of large yachts, creating interesting opportunities. Buying directly from the seller or their appointed broker is preferable to using an intermediary, which can lead to increased costs and communication issues. Refit and repair yards, rather than builders, are more likely to undertake conversion projects, providing more choice and negotiation power for owners. Conversion projects involve combining new and old designs into a single vessel, requiring integration and compliance with evolving regulations. Interfaces between old and new elements can present challenges during and after the conversion process. Commercial vessels exist to fulfil particular roles. When no longer needed they become liabilities which are generally disposed of without delay – often at a fraction of the price of a similar-sized yacht. High-performance military vessels can also become dated or surplus to requirements as geopolitical sands shift, with government bureaucrats having little interest in maximising sale prices. Opportunities to purchase tend to arise on an ad hoc basis. As when buying a yacht, you should ensure that you’re dealing with the seller directly or the seller’s appointed broker. Using an intermediary broker leads to extended lines of communication, more costs and a greater chance of the purchase falling through. YARD CHOICE While conversions may involve the rebuilding of entire parts of the original ship, such projects are always unique, and cannot readily be fitted into a build slot. For this reason, it is generalised refit and repair yards rather than builders which tend to undertake the work. And, as there are more of the former than the latter, owners have more choice and can drive a harder bargain. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS All conversion projects have a number of common characteristics. To a greater or lesser degree, they will all combine new and old designs into a single vessel, which must then function effectively as an integrated whole. All this against a backdrop of constantly evolving regulations governing specifications, materials and equipment. And so there will exist various interfaces between old and new elements which do not exist in the context of newbuilds. Issues may arise not only during the conversion process but well after the vessel has re-entered service in its new role. Depending on the extent of any structural changes, hydrodynamic forces may no longer be distributed as originally intended, possibly compromising previously sound parts. Even where the yard has provided a post-redelivery guarantee of workmanship and materials, it may be an unforeseeable aspect of the combination of old and new elements that leads to a fault – rather than a deficiency in the workmanship and (new) materials. When trading ships are converted from one role to another, there is always the risk that the project will cost more than expected because the works have taken longer than expected and charters and other commercial opportunities have been lost. A yard will often have to pay a fixed, daily rate in compensation as part of their agreement with the owner. The works can be rushed and/or the vessel not properly surveyed prior to agreeing a timescale. As the quality of fit and finish is paramount, a more measured approach is needed for yacht conversions. The unique characteristics of the conversion project give rise to a number of practical and legal issues that need to be considered and addressed before entering into any agreement with the yard. And sometimes even before acquiring the would-be project in the first place. PROJECT MANAGEMENT Converting ships to yachts is, to say the least, a niche business. Using yards more used to converting ships for use in one trade to another can lead to significant cost savings, but the high standards of workmanship and the attention to detail demanded by yacht owners can come as a surprise to the yard’s management. Various specialist third party contractors might be needed – and this may not be how the yard typically operates. It is therefore vital that owners have an experienced and effective project manager in attendance on a full-time basis. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Conversion Agreements Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Conversion Agreements

While the lender retains so much security, it also retains liability as registered owner, so it’s perhaps not surprising that pure leasing isn’t more popular. It does form the basis of various VAT-reduction and deferment schemes. Home Handbook Financing / / Leasing Overview 22 October 2020 Last revised minutes 2 Reading time While the lender retains so much security, it also retains liability as registered owner, so it’s perhaps not surprising that pure leasing isn’t more popular. It does form the basis of various VAT-reduction and deferment schemes. Such schemes come and go, and are not covered here. Feel free to contact us regarding tax avoidance. minutes 2 Reading time 22 October 2020 Last revised While the lender retains so much security, it also retains liability as registered owner, so it’s perhaps not surprising that pure leasing isn’t more popular. It does form the basis of various VAT-reduction and deferment schemes. Such schemes come and go, and are not covered here. Feel free to contact us regarding tax avoidance. The arrangement involves a bank or leasing company (lessor) buying a yacht and becoming its legal owner. The lessor then bareboat charters the yacht to the lessee (owner) for an agreed period of time. The lessee pays instalments equivalent to the full value of the yacht plus a return on capital instead of interest on a loan. The lessee is considered the regulatory owner of the yacht. The lessee has exclusive possession and control of the yacht and must keep it in good working order. Insurance against loss or damage is the lessee's responsibility. The lessee is entitled to the warranties provided by the yard. The lessor is indemnified against liabilities related to being the registered owner. The lessee cannot sell the yacht as they do not own it. To terminate the lease, the lessee must pay the remaining instalments or a cancellation fee. The lessee has exclusive possession and control of the yacht and must keep it in good working order. Insurance against loss or damage is the lessee's responsibility. The lessee is entitled to the warranties provided by the yard. The lessor is indemnified against liabilities related to being the registered owner. The lessee cannot sell the yacht as they do not own it. To terminate the lease, the lessee must pay the remaining instalments or a cancellation fee. The arrangement involves a bank or leasing company (lessor) buying a yacht and becoming its legal owner. The lessor then bareboat charters the yacht to the lessee (owner) for an agreed period of time. The lessee pays instalments equivalent to the full value of the yacht plus a return on capital instead of interest on a loan. The lessee is considered the regulatory owner of the yacht. The bank or leasing company (known as the ‘lessor’) buys the yacht and is the legal, registered owner. Then the lessor, in effect, bareboat charters (so, without crew) it to the ‘owner’ (known as the ‘lessee’), over an agreed period of time. The lessee pays instalments equivalent to the full value of the asset over the term of the lease plus a return on capital to the lender, instead of interest on a loan. At the end of the lease, after the final payment has been made, the asset may be transferred to the lessee. FEATURES Typically, the lessee: Is the ‘owner’ of the yacht for regulatory purposes; Has exclusive possession and control of the yacht; Will be obliged to keep the yacht in good working order; Must insure the yacht against loss or damage; Will be entitled to the yard’s warranties; Must indemnify the lessor against liabilities stemming from the lessor being the registered owner; Cannot sell the yacht as it does not own it; and Must pay the remaining instalments, or a cancellation fee, to terminate the lease agreement. OTHER FORMS The Statement of Standard Accounting Practice SSAP 21 (Accounting for leases and hire purchase contracts) defines a finance lease as a lease which transfers ‘substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset to the lessee’. The distinction is drawn with operating leases, common for aircraft, plant and equipment, where the risk in relation to the asset falls on the lessor rather than the lessee. An operating lease will be treated as being off balance sheet in the lessee’s accounts, and at the expiry of the lease term, the lessee is obliged to return the asset to the lessor and the asset’s residual value is of no concern to the lessee. Only relevant to smaller yachts and tenders, SSAP 21 also distinguishes a hire purchase contract, which allows the hirer to acquire legal title by exercising an option to purchase the asset – normally having paid an agreed number of instalments. SSAP 21 prescribes the accounting treatments, but note that accounting standards are being developed which will supersede SSAP 21. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Loans Overview Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Loans Overview

The loan finance business model is as simple as it sounds: the owner borrows part of the purchase price from a bank or other lender, and is the legal, registered owner of the yacht. The lender takes security over the yacht. While most yacht loan agreements and associated documentation is complex, most of this relates to the lender’s security. Home Handbook Financing / / Loans Overview 21 July 2015 Last revised minutes 2 Reading time The loan finance business model is as simple as it sounds: the owner borrows part of the purchase price from a bank or other lender, and is the legal, registered owner of the yacht. The lender takes security over the yacht. While most yacht loan agreements and associated documentation is complex, most of this relates to the lender’s security. minutes 2 Reading time 21 July 2015 Last revised The loan finance business model is as simple as it sounds: the owner borrows part of the purchase price from a bank or other lender, and is the legal, registered owner of the yacht. The lender takes security over the yacht. While most yacht loan agreements and associated documentation is complex, most of this relates to the lender’s security. Lenders typically use their own documentation, which may lack clarity and organization. The loan agreement outlines the availability of funds and conditions for repayment. Security provisions are crucial and can be detailed in the loan agreement and additional documents. Covenants in the loan agreement specify borrower obligations and restrictions, such as the sale and navigation of the yacht. Assignments of rights under insurance policies and charter earnings may be required. The mortgage on the yacht is registered as part of the loan agreement. Guarantees from third-party companies and beneficial owners provide additional security. Covenants and restrictions aim to ensure proper management, operational compliance, and insurance coverage. Choosing English law and jurisdiction is common in the ship finance sector due to expertise and favorable legal conditions. Opting for English law can save costs and promote amicable relationships among parties involved. The mortgage on the yacht is registered as part of the loan agreement. Guarantees from third-party companies and beneficial owners provide additional security. Covenants and restrictions aim to ensure proper management, operational compliance, and insurance coverage. Choosing English law and jurisdiction is common in the ship finance sector due to expertise and favorable legal conditions. Opting for English law can save costs and promote amicable relationships among parties involved. Lenders typically use their own documentation, which may lack clarity and organization. The loan agreement outlines the availability of funds and conditions for repayment. Security provisions are crucial and can be detailed in the loan agreement and additional documents. Covenants in the loan agreement specify borrower obligations and restrictions, such as the sale and navigation of the yacht. Assignments of rights under insurance policies and charter earnings may be required. Lenders will usually have their own ready-made documentation. While reasonably uniform in scope and contents, the taxonomy and readability usually leave much to be desired. Within the loan agreement, the loan clause sets out that the loan will be available, either in one lump sum where the yacht has already been built, or at certain newbuild milestones. Given that the lender’s not the owner, the security, detailed in the agreement, is comprehensive. Default events are set out in the loan agreement, to make clear the circumstances which will trigger the lender’s right to demand immediate repayment of the loan and what happens in the event such payment is not forthcoming. Finally, various standard boilerplate clauses in the loan agreement deal with key housekeeping matters, with the most important being the law and jurisdiction clause: parties must make sure they are taking advice from an experienced, insured lawyer duly qualified in the correct jurisdiction. SECURITY Security provisions make up most of the loan documentation, and can be set out both in the loan agreement and further documents: A covenants clause within the loan agreement, and/or a separate deed of covenant Assignments to the lender of the borrower’s rights under yacht’s insurance policies An assignment of the yacht’s charter earnings to the lender The mortgage on the yacht, registered pursuant to the loan agreement A guarantee from a third party company owned by the yacht’s beneficial owner A guarantee from the beneficial owner him or herself Covenants set out positive and negative promises on the part of the borrower. There is usually a restriction on the sale of the yacht, and restrictions the geographical navigation and use of the yacht – for example, the yacht may not be allowed to visit places where enforcement of loan could prove challenging. Chartering and operational management often may only be undertake on approved terms. Where management is deficient, insurance cover could be withdrawn and the lender’s security unnecessarily jeopardised. A more detailed analysis of the security requirements is set out here . LAW & JURISDICTION As, for historical reasons, the centre of the world’s ship finance sector is London, it makes sense to ensure that all the contractual relationships are governed by English law and subject to English jurisdiction. Although it is not easy to think of yachts as being ships, that is exactly what they are in the eyes of the law. A greater concentration of yachting lawyers and case-law, coupled with an innovative banking culture and a legal regime which encourages settlement, means that this choice may well save legal costs and maintain good relations among the parties. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice. Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Loan Security Join the discussion over in the Club's group Questions or comments? Please contact us You can also read about Loan Security

We’re not suggesting an end to superyachts of course, just the label. Because, increasingly, the term is also being used pejoratively by some, and as a target by others. And that’s just not helpful to us owners. Is it time to rethink and rebrand? Home Handbook White Papers / / Down With 'Superyachts'? "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less." "The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things." "The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master—that's all." Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass (1871) While there is no legal definition of what a ‘superyacht’ is, this doesn’t stop some unilaterally deciding what it is: > 24 metres in length overall - Superyacht UK > 24 metres in length with full-time captain and crew – Burgess Yachts ≥ 24 metres in loadline length and commercially operated – Warsash Maritime School > 98 feet (29.87metres) in Length - The New Yorker > 30 metres in length – Superyacht Times > 30.48 metres in length overall – Offshore Racing Congress > 45.72 metres in length with a draught of ≥ 3 metres - Port Authority of New South Wales Generally, we know what we mean by the term: a pleasure vessel which, for regulatory reasons and on account of its sheer size, needs a permanent, full-time crew. This is the point at which, irrespective of size, the vessel isn’t just an asset but a place of employment and worker accommodation – all rolled into one. Large yachts, with a full-time crew, have been around since the dawn of the 20th century. But the term ‘superyacht’, and the now lesser-used label ‘megayacht’, have only been in widespread use since the mid-1980s. Looking back at the yachting journals of the 1980s, it’s clear that the terms ‘superyacht’ and ‘megayacht’ were simply applied to distinguish between larger vessels which were owner-operated and smaller ones which were not. It was used by brokers and journalists as hyperbole – long before digital media and online videos allowed size, style and pedigree to speak for themselves. This was an age – let’s not forget – when many owners not only sailed some of the larger yachts themselves but often built or at least fitted them out themselves, too. Fast forward to 2000, and there were still only a fraction of the number of large yachts is use compared to today. It was an industry still largely unknown to those not involved. Most brokers and many captains knew each other. Except for some opportunist paparazzi, most journalists paid little regard. A USEFUL DESCRIPTION To be fair, ‘superyacht’ is a useful term – within the industry itself. When an owner can afford crew, he or she can afford to pay for, say, paint of a higher quality but needing a more exacting application standards. A superyacht insurance policy will take account of the owner’s role as an employer and the vessel’s function as a workplace. But such details can be contained deep within a product’s specification.The term has a kudos all of its own. They are, after all, impressive and effortlessly cool. It makes sense to appropriate the term to distinguish oneself as a services supplier. It adds marketplace swagger – although there has been a tendency, for example, for shipping lawyers with little understanding of the market or business models to label themselves as superyacht lawyers. AN UNWELCOME LABEL? Time and again, however, since the early 2010s, environmentalists – and politicians looking to combine green virtue signalling with the politics of envy – have used the term superyacht in a pejorative sense. Rarely, if ever, do they simply refer to yachts: “ Specifically, we draw attention to assessing aspects of ecological footprints of super yachts [sic], super homes, luxury vehicles, and private jets. Taken together, the construction and use of these items in the United States alone is likely to create a CO2 footprint that exceeds those from entire nations .” Lynch, Long, Stretesky & Barrett: Measuring the Ecological Impact of the Wealthy: Excessive Consumption, Ecological Disorganization, Green Crime, and Justice (2019) “ Among the many possessions of billionaires, large “superyachts” are by far the largest producers of greenhouse gases. ” Barros & Wilk: The outsized carbon footprints of the super-rich (2021) “ Superyacht sale surge prompt fresh calls for curbs on their emissions ” The Guardian , 4 October 2022 “ Superyachts aim to go green – but at what cost? ” Financial Times , 1 September 2022 “ THE SUPERYACHT INDUSTRY IS A SINKING SHIP ” - Extinction Rebellion protestors’ banner unfurled during The Superyacht Forum, 16 November 2022 NOT WANTED & NOT NEEDED Informal discussions with Club Members reveal that many just do not like the term superyacht. It has nowadays, for some, the wrong connotations. It’s become a target as well as a description. A lot of owners neither want nor need the perceived kudos which attaches to the term. In short, they have nothing to prove. Their vessels just happen to be larger than most, more or less in proportion to their net worth. WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? Perhaps the industry needs to bite the bullet and do away with the term superyacht. Remember when The Superyacht Report was just called The Yacht Report? Maybe it's time to change back. Yes, rebranding is expensive, but such changes may prove far less expensive than not evolving. Brand refreshment is a regular necessity. When the next one’s due, let’s drop the ‘super’ and just call a yacht a yacht. It’s not about trying to make large yachts somehow less conspicuous. It is about removing the popular and mistaken distinction between yachts and superyachts, and instead viewing one being merely a subset of the other. Return to top Thank you to all our Members who provided perspectives for this white paper. We’re not suggesting an end to superyachts of course, just the label. Because, increasingly, the term is also being used pejoratively by some, and as a target by others. And that’s just not helpful to us owners. Is it time to rethink and rebrand? 18 November 2022 Last revised minutes 4 Reading time minutes 4 Reading time 18 November 2022 Last revised We’re not suggesting an end to superyachts of course, just the label. Because, increasingly, the term is also being used pejoratively by some, and as a target by others. And that’s just not helpful to us owners. Is it time to rethink and rebrand? The term 'superyacht' has many definitions, but none in law. The term gained widespread use in the mid-1980s to distinguish larger, crewed vessels from smaller ones. The word has become associated with luxury and prestige. In recent years, however, environmentalists and politicians have used the term in a negative way, linking it to excessive consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Informal discussions among our Members reveals that many of us feel we neither want nor need the perceived kudos associated with the term. Some suggest doing away with the term 'superyacht' altogether and simply calling them yachts. Rebranding may be costly, but it could be a worthwhile change for the industry to make. You can also read about Cut to the Chase Questions or comments? Please contact us Join the discussion over in the Club's group You can also read about Cut to the Chase Questions or comments? Please contact us

Answers to questions often asked about The Owners Club, the worldwide association of superyacht owners. By pooling expertise and experience, we’re making ownership easier, more transparent and better value. Home About FAQs / / Any Questions? Have a question? Just contact us . Some regularly asked questions are set out below. Contact Us How do I become a member? Membership so far has been on an informal basis. To meet the needs of today’s rapidly growing numbers of owners and their representatives, we are now working towards online onboarding. This will allow immediate access to the Club’s suite of standard documents and specialist guidance. How long has the Club been in existence? The idea of creating the Club was first floated back in 2008. Only recently, with the return to pre-global financial crisis levels of building, and increasing public scrutiny of large yacht ownership, have Members sought to formalise their association. Which yacht broker do you recommend? While brokers play a vital role in the yacht market, we cannot recommend particular brokers. Each brokerage, and each individual broker, has its, his and her advantages and disadvantages in terms of contacts, experience and location. For the sake of simplicity and ease of completion, we would urge would-be buyers to ensure that they are dealing with central sales agents. Can we advertise with you? Yes – as long as your business isn’t selling yachts or any yachting-related goods or services. Members trust the Club to provide information and assistance without fear or favour. As we provide object owner-focused guidance, allowing yachting businesses to advertise might create a conflict of interest. Find out more here . Can I network with Members? If Members agree, the Club may organise social and networking events for Members and their representatives in future. Can you help find me a captain? Crew agencies, aside, our General Secretary is happy to publicise direct crew and shoreside staff vacancies. Just contact us . Can you manage my yacht? No, but Members will soon be able to use the Club’s standard yacht management agreement to contract with third party managers. Indeed, Members may consider that, using the Club’s suite of documents, there may be certain aspects of management which can be undertaken by their own family offices. Why doesn’t the Club use the term ‘superyacht’? It turns out that most of our Members don’t actually like the terms ‘superyacht’, ‘megayacht' or ‘gigayacht’. They generally feel that it isn’t helpful to be seen by authorities and the media as a special type of yacht. They feel there’s a fine line between label and target.

The Owners Club's General Secretary is an English superyacht lawyer. He is a Partner at a leading international law firm, regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, the Financial Conduct Authority and the London Stock Exchange. Naturally used to maintaining client confidence, he has also provided expertise on the law and practice of yacht ownership to leading publications and broadcasters. Home About Secretariat / / At Your Service It’s a huge honour to be appointed. Having had many owners and managers as clients over the years, I am only too aware of the issues which need to be addressed. BENJAMIN MALTBY, GENERAL SECRETARY TRUSTED PROFESSIONAL CLUB SECRETARIAT We considered it important to have a regulated professional managing the Club and organising its affairs. We have therefore appointed an English lawyer as our General Secretary. He is a Partner at a leading international firm, regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, the Financial Conduct Authority and the London Stock Exchange. Naturally used to maintaining client confidence, he has also provided expertise on the law and practice of yacht ownership to leading publications and broadcasters, including: Truly Independent Leadership FAQs The General Secretary’s role is to operate the Club at a high level, undertake research, provide guidance and draft the documents and agreements essential to yacht acquisition and ownership. Neither the Club nor General Secretary have vested interests in particular third party suppliers. We’re not beholden to particular yachting industry advertisers . So our approach is objective. Our contracts are fair, balanced and conducive to efficient, fuss-free ownership.

The Owners Club's Members' details are held in confidence by our General Secretary, and aren’t revealed to any third party, or other Members. The better part of valour being discretion isn’t just the Club’s guiding ethos. It’s a binding legal obligation. Home About Discretion / / The Soul of Discretion THE LAST GREAT LUXURY Privacy Policy Privacy is the last great luxury of our times. Highly prized by owners, it’s usually a contributing factor in buying a yacht. In an age where data has become a commodity, Members are glad to know that our discretion is absolute. Members' details are held in confidence by the Club’s General Secretary, and aren’t revealed to any third party, or other Members. The better part of valour being discretion isn’t just the Club’s guiding ethos. It’s a binding legal obligation. Some in the yachting industry can be fairly indiscrete. If we, as owners, are going to come together as a club, then we need to safeguard our privacy. This has been achieved. OWNER, 35M MY DISCRETION IS OUR DUTY Learn More Our General Secretary is an English lawyer, for whom discretion isn’t just a promise but a regulated professional requirement. Used to maintaining client confidentiality, he is a Partner at a leading international firm, regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, the Financial Conduct Authority and the London Stock Exchange. The Club’s management company is registered with the United Kingdom Information Commissioner’s Office pursuant to the UK General Data Protection Regulation and the Data Protection Act 2018. By law, the data the Club holds must be held securely and protected against unlawful processing and accidental loss.

Connect to us your way regarding any aspect of The Owners Club - by email, WhatsApp or through LinkedIn. Feel free to run anything past us regarding buying or building a yacht or superyacht, or any aspect of owning, managing or selling. Plus anything to do with superyacht crew recruitment and employment. Home / Contact Reach Out CONNECT YOUR WAY Feel free to drop us a line gensec@theownersclub.org Connect with the General Secretary on LinkedIn here Chat directly with the General Secretary on WhatsApp here Follow our LinkedIn page here