

Home
Handbook
Buying
/
/
What's it
Worth?
7 October 2026
Last revised
minutes
4
Reading time
Establishing a superyacht's value is no small matter. It's not just you as an owner or potential buyer who wants to know. Insurers, lenders, tax authorities and even divorce courts all take a keen interest, and for them getting it wrong can have serious consequences. Here, we explore the main valuation methods, from comparable sales to hedonic regression.
minutes
4
Reading time
7 October 2026
Last revised
Establishing a superyacht's value is no small matter. It's not just you as an owner or potential buyer who wants to know. Insurers, lenders, tax authorities and even divorce courts all take a keen interest, and for them getting it wrong can have serious consequences. Here, we explore the main valuation methods, from comparable sales to hedonic regression.
Insurers, banks, tax authorities and courts all need a rigorous, current valuation of a superyacht, and mistakes can mean losing the entire policy.
Comparable sales analysis is only as reliable as its data, since asking prices are not sale prices and cherry-picked comparables will not survive scrutiny in court.
Flat-rate depreciation is unreliable because real depreciation follows a decelerating curve, and top-end Northern European brands retain a permanent percentage premium.
Hedonic regression captures the main drivers of value across a fleet, but it cannot reflect an individual vessel's condition, refit quality or negotiation.
A superyacht is ultimately worth what a buyer will actually pay for it, so any valuation must be grounded in real sale prices and the vessel's true condition.
Hedonic regression captures the main drivers of value across a fleet, but it cannot reflect an individual vessel's condition, refit quality or negotiation.
A superyacht is ultimately worth what a buyer will actually pay for it, so any valuation must be grounded in real sale prices and the vessel's true condition.
Insurers, banks, tax authorities and courts all need a rigorous, current valuation of a superyacht, and mistakes can mean losing the entire policy.
Comparable sales analysis is only as reliable as its data, since asking prices are not sale prices and cherry-picked comparables will not survive scrutiny in court.
Flat-rate depreciation is unreliable because real depreciation follows a decelerating curve, and top-end Northern European brands retain a permanent percentage premium.


Money can’t buy happiness, but it can buy a superyacht, and that’s about the same. So, how much money are we talking about? With superyachts being the ultimate passion purchase, isn’t valuing them like trying to attach a price tag to a cloud?
It’s easy to look at a superyacht and assume that, where that much money’s being spent, the owner has surely lost count or ceased to care. Whether this is the case or not, others need to know what a superyacht is worth. Not the build cost. Not a yacht broker’s opening gambit. Its current intrinsic value.
WHO WANTS TO KNOW?
Superyacht insurance underwriters need to know. Precisely. Policies can be for an agreed value or for a “sum insured”. In the latter case, this is a cap on liability, with the actual value only being considered after disaster strikes. In the landmark case of the Thor II, the owner thought that putting a sum insured figure of US$ 1.5 million in the policy schedule meant they had an agreed valuation. The court held that underwriters were only on the hook for the vessel’s actual market value at the time of loss—a paltry US$ 800,000.
So what happens when the value is agreed but the owner provides a deliberately over-optimistic figure? That’s not going to end well either. In the infamous 2015 case of the Galatea, the owner of a Riva 115 motor yacht insured her for an agreed value of €13 million, despite being in possession of market valuations putting her at €7-8 million. She was destroyed by fire. The court held that failing to disclose the lower market valuations—even innocently—was a material non-disclosure that entitled underwriters to void the policy completely. The owner received nothing.
The more a vessel is worth, the less likely it is that, as an owner, you’re going to want to see that much capital tied up. You’ll know what the ROI would be if it were invested in one of your businesses. So financing makes sense. Banks want auditable, stone-cold numbers to justify their loan-to-value, ensuring that their loan is properly secured, with ongoing valuations to make sure they aren’t left holding negative equity if the market slumps. And tax authorities need valuations. And let’s not get started on divorce courts.
COMPARABLE SALES EVALUATION
Much as anyone would do when buying a used car, this method matches the target yacht with similar vessels currently on the market, adjusting for size, age and builder. Gross tonnage (GT) is preferred over Length Overall (LOA) as volume represents the actual usable living space. While length is the most prominent measurement, it can be deceptive.
But asking price, of course, is not value. Publicly available figures consist almost entirely of advertised asking prices, which can be realistic or optimistic. Who knows?
In the Galatea trial, the judge dismantled the expert valuer’s comparable analysis because the expert had cherry-picked his data: he arbitrarily excluded a high-priced comparable Riva listing, failed to make monetary adjustments for superior builder quality and calculated his market discount using distressed forced sales from banks.
FLAT-RATE ANNUAL DEPRECIATION
This approach takes a known original build price, and assumes that a superyacht thereafter depreciates at a fixed annual percentage throughout its life. A modest mathematical element gives the impression of a scientific approach. Yet this has to be the laziest and most unreliable approach of all—even if the original build price is known. Which it normally isn’t. In the Galatea case, the judge rejected this approach, stating that there is no such thing as a typical or expected rate of depreciation.
In fact, empirical research, calibrated on a statistically significant spread of brokerage listings, shows that depreciation follows a broadly predictable curve—decelerating over time—rather than a straight line. Interestingly, the figures show that top-end Northern European brands command a premium which, if expressed as a percentage of the new or near-new price, is permanent: the premium does not erode with age.
HEDONIC REGRESSION
This model breaks down the item being valued into its constituent characteristics (size, year, builder reputation, etc.), and assigns a negative or positive value to each. Once all the variables are fed into the equation, a value can be derived.
Regression is brilliant because it ensures that the key factors influencing value are all considered. But it is not infallible. Regression models measure how well a model ranks vessels across a fleet—it does not give pinpoint accuracy on a single hull. It does not capture current condition or the extent or quality of any refits. Neither does it reflect specific negotiation. And the model copes less well with less common characteristics, such as sailing yachts. The main point of weakness is that it is only as good as the information used to derive each element, and for that there is no substitute for information on real sale prices.
SUMMING UP
Valuing a superyacht is not an abstract science. Valuations must be rooted in reality: the true attributes and condition of the vessel, in the context of comparable actual sale prices. They are predictions, not prices. And a superyacht is worth what someone will actually pay for it, not what the owner hopes, not what the broker whispers and not what looks best on a policy schedule.

Thank you to all our Members who contributed to this article. Unless otherwise stated, this article broadly describes, by way of illustration, the situation in the United Kingdom waters in respect of United Kingdom-registered vessels. This piece does not provide or replace legal advice.
Join the discussion over in
the Club's group
Questions or comments?
You can also read about

